From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtEW1-0002Xu-Q4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:33:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtEVz-0003Yx-Kl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:33:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:13:54 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20190211171354.40be0856.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1981d9bc-e950-62ef-d2d2-66a17771c8f4@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190130132212.7376-1-cohuck@redhat.com> <20190206150016.6fdfaf8f.cohuck@redhat.com> <1981d9bc-e950-62ef-d2d2-66a17771c8f4@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] vfio-ccw: support hsch/csch (kernel part) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Farman Cc: Halil Pasic , Farhan Ali , Pierre Morel , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Alex Williamson On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:19:58 -0500 Eric Farman wrote: > On 02/06/2019 09:00 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:22:06 +0100 > > Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > >> [This is the Linux kernel part, git tree is available at > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/vfio-ccw.git vfio-ccw-eagain-caps-v3 > > > > I've pushed out the changes I've made so far (patch 1) to > > vfio-ccw-eagain-caps-v3.5. I'll wait a bit for more comments before > > sending a new version. > > > > Thanks for that branch... For patch 1 in v3.5: > > Reviewed-by: Eric Farman Thanks! > > >> > >> The companion QEMU patches are available at > >> https://github.com/cohuck/qemu vfio-ccw-caps > >> This is the previously posted v2 version, which should continue to work.] > > > > I would not mind if somebody looked at those as well :) > > Not precluding anyone else from doing so :) ... I'd planned on looking > at them as I get into the meat of patches 4-6 on the kernel side, where > the overlap occurs. I'm getting close. :) Cool :) I'll wait a bit more before resending, then. (I'll probably rebase the QEMU side as well when I do resend.) > > FWIW, I've been running with both series for the last week or two, along > with some host kernel traces to prove things got executed the way I > thought, and it's seemed to be working well. So that makes me > optimistic for the later patches. That's good news, thanks for testing. Do you have a special test load that you run in the guest that you can share?