[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] pci, vhost-user: Fix two incorrectly applied patches

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] pci, vhost-user: Fix two incorrectly applied patches

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

Commit a56de056c91f8 squashed two unrelated commits at once.
Revert it and reapply the two commits to avoid confusion.

See: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-02/msg02966.html

Changpeng Liu (1):
  contrib/vhost-user-blk: fix the compilation issue

Peter Xu (1):
  i386/kvm: ignore masked irqs when update msi routes

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1):
  Revert "contrib/vhost-user-blk: fix the compilation issue"


-- 
2.20.1

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Revert "contrib/vhost-user-blk: fix the compilation issue"

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

Commit a56de056c91f8 squashed the following two unrelated commits
at once:

- "contrib/vhost-user-blk: fix the compilation issue"
  (Message-Id: 1547615970-23545-2-git-send-email-changpeng.liu@intel.com)
- "i386/kvm: ignore masked irqs when update msi routes"
  (Message-Id: 20190116030815.27273-5-peterx@redhat.com)

While the git history remains bisectable, having a commit that changes
MSI/MSIX code but describes it as "fix vhost-user-blk compilation" is
rather confusing.
Revert the offending commit to properly apply both patches separately.

Reported-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Fixes: a56de056c91f8
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 contrib/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk.c |  6 +-----
 target/i386/kvm.c                       | 14 +++-----------
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk.c b/contrib/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk.c
index 43583f2659..5c2092e13a 100644
--- a/contrib/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk.c
+++ b/contrib/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk.c
@@ -20,10 +20,6 @@
 #include "contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user-glib.h"
 #include "contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.h"
 
-#if defined(__linux__)
-#include <linux/fs.h>
-#include <sys/ioctl.h>
-#endif
 
 struct virtio_blk_inhdr {
     unsigned char status;
@@ -525,7 +521,7 @@ vub_get_blocksize(int fd)
 
 #if defined(__linux__) && defined(BLKSSZGET)
     if (ioctl(fd, BLKSSZGET, &blocksize) == 0) {
-        return blocksize;
+        return blocklen;
     }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
index beae1b99da..9af4542fb8 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
@@ -3894,7 +3894,7 @@ static QLIST_HEAD(, MSIRouteEntry) msi_route_list = \
 static void kvm_update_msi_routes_all(void *private, bool global,
                                       uint32_t index, uint32_t mask)
 {
-    int cnt = 0, vector;
+    int cnt = 0;
     MSIRouteEntry *entry;
     MSIMessage msg;
     PCIDevice *dev;
@@ -3902,19 +3902,11 @@ static void kvm_update_msi_routes_all(void *private, bool global,
     /* TODO: explicit route update */
     QLIST_FOREACH(entry, &msi_route_list, list) {
         cnt++;
-        vector = entry->vector;
         dev = entry->dev;
-        if (msix_enabled(dev) && !msix_is_masked(dev, vector)) {
-            msg = msix_get_message(dev, vector);
-        } else if (msi_enabled(dev) && !msi_is_masked(dev, vector)) {
-            msg = msi_get_message(dev, vector);
-        } else {
-            /*
-             * Either MSI/MSIX is disabled for the device, or the
-             * specific message was masked out.  Skip this one.
-             */
+        if (!msix_enabled(dev) && !msi_enabled(dev)) {
             continue;
         }
+        msg = pci_get_msi_message(dev, entry->vector);
         kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, entry->virq, msg, dev);
     }
     kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(kvm_state);
-- 
2.20.1

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] contrib/vhost-user-blk: fix the compilation issue

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

From: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1547615970-23545-2-git-send-email-changpeng.liu@intel.com>
[PMD: this patch was first (incorrectly) introduced as a56de056c91f8]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 contrib/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/contrib/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk.c b/contrib/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk.c
index 5c2092e13a..43583f2659 100644
--- a/contrib/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk.c
+++ b/contrib/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk.c
@@ -20,6 +20,10 @@
 #include "contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user-glib.h"
 #include "contrib/libvhost-user/libvhost-user.h"
 
+#if defined(__linux__)
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#endif
 
 struct virtio_blk_inhdr {
     unsigned char status;
@@ -521,7 +525,7 @@ vub_get_blocksize(int fd)
 
 #if defined(__linux__) && defined(BLKSSZGET)
     if (ioctl(fd, BLKSSZGET, &blocksize) == 0) {
-        return blocklen;
+        return blocksize;
     }
 #endif
 
-- 
2.20.1

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] i386/kvm: ignore masked irqs when update msi routes

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

When we are with intel-iommu device and with IR on, KVM will register
an IEC notifier to detect interrupt updates from the guest and we'll
kick off kvm_update_msi_routes_all() when it happens to make sure
kernel IRQ cache is matching the latest.

Though, kvm_update_msi_routes_all() is buggy in that it ignored the
mask bit of either MSI/MSIX messages and it tries to translate the
message even if the corresponding message was already masked by the
guest driver (hence the MSI/MSIX message will be invalid).

Without this patch, we can receive an error message when we reboot a
guest with both an assigned vfio-pci device and intel-iommu enabled:

  qemu-system-x86_64: vtd_interrupt_remap_msi: MSI address low 32 bit invalid: 0x0

The error does not affect functionality of the guest since when we
failed to translate we'll just silently continue (which makes sense
since crashing the VM for this seems even worse), but still it's
better to fix it up.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190116030815.27273-5-peterx@redhat.com>
[PMD: this patch was first (incorrectly) introduced as a56de056c91f8]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 target/i386/kvm.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
index 9af4542fb8..beae1b99da 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
@@ -3894,7 +3894,7 @@ static QLIST_HEAD(, MSIRouteEntry) msi_route_list = \
 static void kvm_update_msi_routes_all(void *private, bool global,
                                       uint32_t index, uint32_t mask)
 {
-    int cnt = 0;
+    int cnt = 0, vector;
     MSIRouteEntry *entry;
     MSIMessage msg;
     PCIDevice *dev;
@@ -3902,11 +3902,19 @@ static void kvm_update_msi_routes_all(void *private, bool global,
     /* TODO: explicit route update */
     QLIST_FOREACH(entry, &msi_route_list, list) {
         cnt++;
+        vector = entry->vector;
         dev = entry->dev;
-        if (!msix_enabled(dev) && !msi_enabled(dev)) {
+        if (msix_enabled(dev) && !msix_is_masked(dev, vector)) {
+            msg = msix_get_message(dev, vector);
+        } else if (msi_enabled(dev) && !msi_is_masked(dev, vector)) {
+            msg = msi_get_message(dev, vector);
+        } else {
+            /*
+             * Either MSI/MSIX is disabled for the device, or the
+             * specific message was masked out.  Skip this one.
+             */
             continue;
         }
-        msg = pci_get_msi_message(dev, entry->vector);
         kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, entry->virq, msg, dev);
     }
     kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(kvm_state);
-- 
2.20.1

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] pci, vhost-user: Fix two incorrectly applied patches

[Peter Xu]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:06:18PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Commit a56de056c91f8 squashed two unrelated commits at once.
> Revert it and reapply the two commits to avoid confusion.
> 
> See: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-02/msg02966.html

This does look slightly better.  Thanks Phil & Michael.

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

-- 
Peter Xu