From: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 4/4] numa: check threads of the same core are on the same node
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:48:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212214827.30543-5-lvivier@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190212214827.30543-1-lvivier@redhat.com>
A core cannot be split between two nodes.
To check if a thread of the same core has already been assigned to a node,
this patch reverses the numa topology checking order and exits if the
topology is not valid.
Update test/numa-test accordingly.
Fixes: 722387e78daf ("spapr: get numa node mapping from possible_cpus instead of numa_get_node_for_cpu()")
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
---
hw/core/machine.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
tests/numa-test.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
index a2c29692b55e..c0a556b0dce7 100644
--- a/hw/core/machine.c
+++ b/hw/core/machine.c
@@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine,
MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
bool match = false;
int i;
+ const CpuInstanceProperties *previous_props = NULL;
if (!mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids) {
error_setg(errp, "mapping of CPUs to NUMA node is not supported");
@@ -634,18 +635,38 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine,
}
/* skip slots with explicit mismatch */
- if (props->has_thread_id && props->thread_id != slot->props.thread_id) {
+ if (props->has_socket_id && props->socket_id != slot->props.socket_id) {
continue;
}
- if (props->has_core_id && props->core_id != slot->props.core_id) {
+ if (props->has_core_id) {
+ if (props->core_id != slot->props.core_id) {
continue;
+ }
+ if (slot->props.has_node_id) {
+ /* we have a node where our core is already assigned */
+ previous_props = &slot->props;
+ }
}
- if (props->has_socket_id && props->socket_id != slot->props.socket_id) {
+ if (props->has_thread_id && props->thread_id != slot->props.thread_id) {
continue;
}
+ /* check current thread matches node of the thread of the same core */
+ if (previous_props && previous_props->has_node_id &&
+ previous_props->node_id != props->node_id) {
+ char *cpu_str = cpu_props_to_string(props);
+ char *node_str = cpu_props_to_string(previous_props);
+ error_setg(errp, "Invalid node-id=%"PRIu64" of [%s]: core-id "
+ "[%s] is already assigned to node-id %"PRIu64,
+ props->node_id, cpu_str,
+ node_str, previous_props->node_id);
+ g_free(cpu_str);
+ g_free(node_str);
+ return;
+ }
+
/* reject assignment if slot is already assigned, for compatibility
* of legacy cpu_index mapping with SPAPR core based mapping do not
* error out if cpu thread and matched core have the same node-id */
diff --git a/tests/numa-test.c b/tests/numa-test.c
index 5280573fc992..a7c3c5b4dee8 100644
--- a/tests/numa-test.c
+++ b/tests/numa-test.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void pc_numa_cpu(const void *data)
"-numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=0 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,core-id=0 "
"-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,core-id=1,thread-id=0 "
- "-numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=1,core-id=1,thread-id=1");
+ "-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,core-id=1,thread-id=1");
qtest_start(cli);
cpus = get_cpus(&resp);
g_assert(cpus);
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static void pc_numa_cpu(const void *data)
} else if (socket == 1 && core == 1 && thread == 0) {
g_assert_cmpint(node, ==, 0);
} else if (socket == 1 && core == 1 && thread == 1) {
- g_assert_cmpint(node, ==, 1);
+ g_assert_cmpint(node, ==, 0);
} else {
g_assert(false);
}
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-12 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-12 21:48 [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] numa, spapr: add thread-id in the possible_cpus list Laurent Vivier
2019-02-12 21:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/4] " Laurent Vivier
2019-02-13 1:25 ` David Gibson
2019-02-13 8:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-02-13 9:08 ` Laurent Vivier
2019-02-13 12:16 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-02-12 21:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/4] numa: exit on incomplete CPU mapping Laurent Vivier
2019-02-12 21:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 3/4] numa: move cpu_slot_to_string() upper in the function Laurent Vivier
2019-02-12 21:48 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
2019-02-13 1:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 4/4] numa: check threads of the same core are on the same node David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190212214827.30543-5-lvivier@redhat.com \
--to=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).