From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41821) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gttu0-0001hm-Q6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 07:44:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gttty-00034B-G7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 07:44:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gttty-00032u-9k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 07:44:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 13:44:28 +0100 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20190213134428.11b03224@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1549377087-205549-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> References: <1549377087-205549-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hostmem: fix crash when querying empty host-nodes property via QMP List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, Eric Blake , mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 15:31:27 +0100 Igor Mammedov wrote: > QEMU will crashes with > qapi/qobject-output-visitor.c:210: qobject_output_complete: Assertion `qov->root && ((&qov->stack)->slh_first == ((void *)0))' failed > when trying to get value of empty hostmem.host-nodes property. > > Fix it by calling visitor even if host-nodes wasn't set > before exiting from property getter to return empty list. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov > --- > backends/hostmem.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/backends/hostmem.c b/backends/hostmem.c > index 0c8ef17..fe14be5 100644 > --- a/backends/hostmem.c > +++ b/backends/hostmem.c > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, > > value = find_first_bit(backend->host_nodes, MAX_NODES); > if (value == MAX_NODES) { > - return; > + goto ret; > } > > *node = g_malloc0(sizeof(**node)); > @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ host_memory_backend_get_host_nodes(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, > node = &(*node)->next; > } while (true); > > +ret: > visit_type_uint16List(v, name, &host_nodes, errp); > } > Markus/Michael, does this patch make sense from QAPI point of view?