From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
libvir-list@redhat.com, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] block/dirty-bitmaps: move comment block
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:23:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190213232356.21034-7-jsnow@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213232356.21034-1-jsnow@redhat.com>
Simply move the big status enum comment block to above the status
function, and document it as being deprecated. The whole confusing
block can get deleted in three releases time.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
---
block/dirty-bitmap.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
index 8ab048385a..fc390cae94 100644
--- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -28,22 +28,6 @@
#include "block/block_int.h"
#include "block/blockjob.h"
-/**
- * A BdrvDirtyBitmap can be in four possible user-visible states:
- * (1) Active: successor is NULL, and disabled is false: full r/w mode
- * (2) Disabled: successor is NULL, and disabled is true: qualified r/w mode,
- * guest writes are dropped, but monitor writes are possible,
- * through commands like merge and clear.
- * (3) Frozen: successor is not NULL.
- * A frozen bitmap cannot be renamed, deleted, cleared, set,
- * enabled, merged to, etc. A frozen bitmap can only abdicate()
- * or reclaim().
- * In this state, the anonymous successor bitmap may be either
- * Active and recording writes from the guest (e.g. backup jobs),
- * but it can be Disabled and not recording writes.
- * (4) Locked: Whether Active or Disabled, the user cannot modify this bitmap
- * in any way from the monitor.
- */
struct BdrvDirtyBitmap {
QemuMutex *mutex;
HBitmap *bitmap; /* Dirty bitmap implementation */
@@ -205,7 +189,25 @@ bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_enabled(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
return !bitmap->disabled;
}
-/* Called with BQL taken. */
+/**
+ * bdrv_dirty_bitmap_status: This API is now deprecated.
+ * Called with BQL taken.
+ *
+ * A BdrvDirtyBitmap can be in four possible user-visible states:
+ * (1) Active: successor is NULL, and disabled is false: full r/w mode
+ * (2) Disabled: successor is NULL, and disabled is true: qualified r/w mode,
+ * guest writes are dropped, but monitor writes are possible,
+ * through commands like merge and clear.
+ * (3) Frozen: successor is not NULL.
+ * A frozen bitmap cannot be renamed, deleted, cleared, set,
+ * enabled, merged to, etc. A frozen bitmap can only abdicate()
+ * or reclaim().
+ * In this state, the anonymous successor bitmap may be either
+ * Active and recording writes from the guest (e.g. backup jobs),
+ * but it can be Disabled and not recording writes.
+ * (4) Locked: Whether Active or Disabled, the user cannot modify this bitmap
+ * in any way from the monitor.
+ */
DirtyBitmapStatus bdrv_dirty_bitmap_status(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
{
if (bdrv_dirty_bitmap_has_successor(bitmap)) {
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-13 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 23:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] dirty-bitmaps: deprecate @status field John Snow
2019-02-13 23:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/6] block/dirty-bitmap: add recording and busy properties John Snow
2019-02-14 2:54 ` Eric Blake
2019-02-18 13:27 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-02-13 23:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] block/dirty-bitmaps: rename frozen predicate helper John Snow
2019-02-14 2:57 ` Eric Blake
2019-02-18 13:57 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-02-18 17:11 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-02-18 22:32 ` John Snow
2019-02-19 10:17 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-02-19 20:05 ` John Snow
2019-02-13 23:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/6] block/dirty-bitmap: change semantics of enabled predicate John Snow
2019-02-18 16:39 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-02-18 23:15 ` John Snow
2019-02-13 23:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/6] block/dirty-bitmap: explicitly lock bitmaps with successors John Snow
2019-02-18 16:52 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-02-18 22:13 ` John Snow
2019-02-13 23:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] block/dirty-bitmaps: unify qmp_locked and user_locked calls John Snow
2019-02-18 17:27 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-02-18 23:24 ` John Snow
2019-02-13 23:23 ` John Snow [this message]
2019-02-14 3:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] block/dirty-bitmaps: move comment block Eric Blake
2019-02-18 17:39 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-02-18 22:03 ` John Snow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190213232356.21034-7-jsnow@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).