From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Yan Vugenfirer <yan@daynix.com>,
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: do not start queues that are not enabled by the guest
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 07:33:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190225073056-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94c6cead-7ed1-2269-2c2b-8534849d9e41@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 03:47:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/2/22 下午12:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:10:08PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:04:05AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On 2019/2/22 上午9:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 05:40:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > On 2019/2/21 下午4:18, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For 1.0 device, we can fix the queue_enable, but for 0.9x device how do
> > > > > > you enable one specific queue in this case? (setting status?)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do I understand correctly that for 0.9 device in some cases the device will
> > > > > > receive feature _MQ set, but will not receive VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET?
> > > > > > Or the problem is different?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let me clarify, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MQ_VQ_PAIRS_SET is used to control the the
> > > > > > number of queue pairs used by device for doing transmission and reception. It
> > > > > > was not used to enable or disable a virtqueue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For 1.0 device, we should use queue_enable in pci cfg to enable and disable
> > > > > > queue:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We could do:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) allocate memory and set queue_enable for vq0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2) allocate memory and set queue_enable for vq1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3) Set vq paris to 1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 4) allocate memory and set queue_enable for vq2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 5) allocate memory and set queue_enable for vq3
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 6) set vq pairs to 2
> > > > > I do not think spec allows this.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The driver MUST follow this sequence to initialize a device:
> > > > > 1. Reset the device.
> > > > > 2. Set the ACKNOWLEDGE status bit: the guest OS has noticed the device.
> > > > > 3. Set the DRIVER status bit: the guest OS knows how to drive the device.
> > > > > 4. Read device feature bits, and write the subset of feature bits understood by the OS and driver to the
> > > > > device. During this step the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) the device-specific configuration
> > > > > fields to check that it can support the device before accepting it.
> > > > > 5. Set the FEATURES_OK status bit. The driver MUST NOT accept new feature bits after this step.
> > > > > 6. Re-read device status to ensure the FEATURES_OK bit is still set: otherwise, the device does not
> > > > > support our subset of features and the device is unusable.
> > > > > 7. Perform device-specific setup, including discovery of virtqueues for the device, optional per-bus setup,
> > > > > reading and possibly writing the device’s virtio configuration space, and population of virtqueues.
> > > > > 8. Set the DRIVER_OK status bit. At this point the device is “live”.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thus vqs are setup at step 7.
> > > > >
> > > > > # of vq pairs are set up through a command which is a special
> > > > > buffer, and spec says:
> > > > >
> > > > > The driver MUST NOT send any buffer available notifications to the device before setting DRIVER_OK.
> > > >
> > > > So you meant write to queue_enable is forbidden after DRIVER_OK (though it's
> > > > not very clear to me from the spec). And if a driver want to enable new
> > > > queues, it must reset the device?
> > >
> > > That's my reading. What do you think?
>
>
> Looks like I can infer this from the spec, maybe it's better to clarify.
>
>
> > Btw some legacy drivers might violate this by addig buffers
> > before driver_ok.
>
>
> Yes, but it's probably too late to fix them.
>
> Thanks.
Right. As a work around virtio net also checks rings
when it detects driver ok. We can disable that when VIRTIO_1
has been negotiated.
>
> > > > >
> > > > > > But this requires a proper implementation for queue_enable for vhost which is
> > > > > > missed in qemu and probably what you really want to do.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but for 0.9x device, there's no such way to do this. That's the issue.
> > > > > 0.9x there's no queue enable, assumption is PA!=0 means VQ has
> > > > > been enabled.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > So
> > > > > > driver must allocate all queBes before starting the device, otherwise there's
> > > > > > no way to enable it afterwards.
> > > > > As per spec queues must be allocated before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > That is universal.
> > > >
> > > > If I understand correctly, this is not what is done by current windows
> > > > drivers.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > There're tricks to make it work like what is
> > > > > > done in your patch, but it depends on a specific implementation like qemu which
> > > > > > is sub-optimal.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A fundamental question is what prevents you from just initialization all
> > > > > > queues during driver start? It looks to me this save lots of efforts
> > > > > > than allocating queue dynamically.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is not so trivial in Windows driver, as it does not have objects for queues
> > > > > > that it does not use. Linux driver first of all allocates all the
> > > > > > queues and then
> > > > > > adds Rx/Tx to those it will use. Windows driver first decides how many queues
> > > > > > it will use then allocates objects for them and initializes them from zero to
> > > > > > fully functional state.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, you just need to allocate some memory for the virtqueue, there's no need
> > > > > > to make it visible to the rest until it was enabled.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-25 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 14:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: do not start queues that are not enabled by the guest Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-18 3:49 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-18 9:58 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-18 16:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-18 20:49 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-18 23:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-19 6:27 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-19 14:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-20 10:13 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-21 6:00 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-21 6:49 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-21 8:18 ` Yuri Benditovich
2019-02-21 9:40 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-22 1:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22 3:04 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-22 3:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-22 4:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-02-25 7:47 ` Jason Wang
2019-02-25 12:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2019-02-28 14:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190225073056-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yan@daynix.com \
--cc=yuri.benditovich@daynix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).