From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gypZf-0000zE-1v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 22:07:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gypZV-0001O0-9z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 22:07:52 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:18081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gypZT-0001Lj-4Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 22:07:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:07:16 +0800 From: Wei Yang Message-ID: <20190227030715.GA5449@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20190226073159.13434-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fw_cfg: use __ATTR_RO_MODE to define rev sysfs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= Cc: Wei Yang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, somlo@cmu.edu, mst@redhat.com On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:45:46PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >Hi Wei, > >On 2/26/19 8:31 AM, Wei Yang wrote: >> Leverage __ATTR_RO_MODE to define rev sysfs instead of using open code >> to define the attribute. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang >> --- >> drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c | 13 ++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c >> index 039e0f91dba8..a1293cbd7adb 100644 >> --- a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c >> @@ -296,18 +296,13 @@ static int fw_cfg_do_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return 0; >> } >> >> -static ssize_t fw_cfg_showrev(struct kobject *k, struct attribute *a, char *buf) >> +static ssize_t fw_cfg_rev_show(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *a, >> + char *buf) >> { >> return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", fw_cfg_rev); >> } >> - >> -static const struct { >> - struct attribute attr; >> - ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *k, struct attribute *a, char *buf); >> -} fw_cfg_rev_attr = { >> - .attr = { .name = "rev", .mode = S_IRUSR }, >> - .show = fw_cfg_showrev, >> -}; >> +static const struct kobj_attribute fw_cfg_rev_attr = >> + __ATTR_RO_MODE(fw_cfg_rev, 0400); > >Why not keep S_IRUSR? > Because scripts/checkpatch.pl suggest not use S_IRUSR :-) I am not sure about the particular reason. >> >> /* fw_cfg_sysfs_entry type */ >> struct fw_cfg_sysfs_entry { >> -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me