From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzM5U-00080q-D2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:51:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gzM5T-00013k-Dz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:51:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:50:54 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Message-ID: <20190228135054.GE9217@redhat.com> Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= References: <4817f5c3b20aedba869608c06e76d11a722f4864.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4817f5c3b20aedba869608c06e76d11a722f4864.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] trivial malloc to g_malloc in thunk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aarushi Mehta Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Julia Suvorova On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:12:45PM +0530, Aarushi Mehta wrote: > Hi > > This is a trivial contribution part of the BiteSizedTasks on the wiki. > I found this discussion http://git.corpit.ru/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=b45c03f585ea9bb1af76c73e82195418c294919d > on migrating even g_malloc to g_new, is this not appropriate for the same? > The wiki can presumably use an update regarding this. This kind of question should not be in the commit message - it shoudl go below the '---' > > Signed-off-by: Aarushi > --- ....here.... This lets people answer the question, without the question becoming part of the git history. > thunk.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/thunk.c b/thunk.c > index d5d8645cd4..03fb2abab7 100644 > --- a/thunk.c > +++ b/thunk.c > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void thunk_register_struct(int id, const char *name, const argtype *types) > for(i = 0;i < 2; i++) { > offset = 0; > max_align = 1; > - se->field_offsets[i] = malloc(nb_fields * sizeof(int)); > + se->field_offsets[i] = g_malloc(nb_fields * sizeof(int)); Yes, this should use g_new0 > type_ptr = se->field_types; > for(j = 0;j < nb_fields; j++) { > size = thunk_type_size(type_ptr, i); > -- > 2.17.1 > > > Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|