From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
"peter.maydell@linaro.org" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"qemu-arm@nongnu.org" <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@huawei.com>, Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/4] hw:acpi: Make ACPI IO address space configurable
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:44:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190228174424.1cae71b8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FC3163CFD30C246ABAA99954A238FA8392D7AB9@lhreml524-mbs.china.huawei.com>
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 16:09:48 +0000
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com]
> > Sent: 27 February 2019 17:53
> > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> > shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com; peter.maydell@linaro.org;
> > imammedo@redhat.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org
> > Cc: xuwei (O) <xuwei5@huawei.com>; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] hw:acpi: Make ACPI IO address space
> > configurable
> >
> > Hi Shameer,
> > On 1/28/19 12:05 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > > This is in preparation for adding support for ARM64 platforms where it
> > > doesn't use port mapped IO for ACPI IO space.
> > >
> > > Also add a flag to identify hw reduced ACPI platforms as they might
> > > use GPIO hw for signaling ACPI platform events.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> > > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 3 ++-
> > > include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h | 6 ++++--
> > > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c b/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c index
> > > 921cad2..05f1d45 100644
> > > --- a/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> > > +++ b/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
> > > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
> > > #define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN 24
> > > #define MEMORY_DEVICES_CONTAINER "\\_SB.MHPC"
> > >
> > > -static uint16_t memhp_io_base;
> > > +static hwaddr memhp_io_base;
> > >
> > > static ACPIOSTInfo *acpi_memory_device_status(int slot, MemStatus
> > > *mdev) { @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps
> > > acpi_memory_hotplug_ops = { };
> > >
> > > void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(MemoryRegion *as, Object *owner,
> > > - MemHotplugState *state, uint16_t
> > io_base)
> > > + MemHotplugState *state, hwaddr
> > io_base)
> > > {
> > > MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> > >
> > > @@ -279,7 +279,9 @@ void acpi_memory_plug_cb(HotplugHandler
> > *hotplug_dev, MemHotplugState *mem_st,
> > > mdev->is_enabled = true;
> > > if (dev->hotplugged) {
> > > mdev->is_inserting = true;
> > > - acpi_send_event(DEVICE(hotplug_dev),
> > ACPI_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_STATUS);
> > > + if (!mem_st->hw_reduced_acpi) {
> > > + acpi_send_event(DEVICE(hotplug_dev),
> > ACPI_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_STATUS);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -341,7 +343,8 @@ const VMStateDescription
> > vmstate_memory_hotplug =
> > > {
> > >
> > > void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
> > > const char *res_root,
> > > - const char *event_handler_method)
> > > + const char *event_handler_method,
> > > + AmlRegionSpace rs)
> > > {
> > > int i;
> > > Aml *ifctx;
> > > @@ -371,7 +374,7 @@ void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table,
> > uint32_t nr_mem,
> > > aml_append(mem_ctrl_dev, aml_name_decl("_CRS", crs));
> > >
> > > aml_append(mem_ctrl_dev, aml_operation_region(
> > > - MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_REGION, AML_SYSTEM_IO,
> > > + MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_REGION, rs,
> > > aml_int(memhp_io_base), MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN)
> > Given the change in the datatype (memhp_io_base) is it OK to keep the
> > aml_int() cast.
>
> Hmm...aml_int() has uint64_t but not sure hwaddr will cause any unwarranted effects on
> other platforms. Do you see any potential issues here?
aml_int encodes it according to the value so it should e fine
>
> > Also we have
> > "
> > aml_append(crs,
> > aml_io(AML_DECODE16, memhp_io_base, memhp_io_base, 0,
> > MEMORY_HOTPLUG_IO_LEN)
> > );
> > " where we have aml_io being used + AML_decode16. Shouldn't we have
> > aml_*_memory depending on rs?
>
> That looks like a valid point, but then I wonder how this worked. I will double check.
maybe use aml_memory32_fixed() or aml_[dq]word_memory()
> > I am not knowledged enough about the aml description but just in case.
>
> Same here :).
>
> Thanks,
> Shameer
>
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > > );
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c index
> > > 2e21a31..b62c1a3 100644
> > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > @@ -1852,7 +1852,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker
> > *linker,
> > > build_cpus_aml(dsdt, machine, opts, pm->cpu_hp_io_base,
> > > "\\_SB.PCI0", "\\_GPE._E02");
> > > }
> > > - build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, "\\_SB.PCI0",
> > "\\_GPE._E03");
> > > + build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, "\\_SB.PCI0",
> > > + "\\_GPE._E03", AML_SYSTEM_IO);
> > >
> > > scope = aml_scope("_GPE");
> > > {
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > b/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > index 77c6576..ec56579 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
> > > @@ -26,10 +26,11 @@ typedef struct MemHotplugState {
> > > uint32_t selector;
> > > uint32_t dev_count;
> > > MemStatus *devs;
> > > + bool hw_reduced_acpi; /*true for hw reduced acpi platform */
> > > } MemHotplugState;
> > >
> > > void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(MemoryRegion *as, Object *owner,
> > > - MemHotplugState *state, uint16_t
> > io_base);
> > > + MemHotplugState *state, hwaddr
> > > + io_base);
> > >
> > > void acpi_memory_plug_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > MemHotplugState *mem_st,
> > > DeviceState *dev, Error **errp); @@ -48,5
> > > +49,6 @@ void acpi_memory_ospm_status(MemHotplugState *mem_st,
> > > ACPIOSTInfoList ***list);
> > >
> > > void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
> > > const char *res_root,
> > > - const char *event_handler_method);
> > > + const char *event_handler_method,
> > > + AmlRegionSpace rs);
> > > #endif
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-28 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-28 11:05 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] ARM virt: ACPI memory hotplug support Shameer Kolothum
2019-01-28 11:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/4] hw:acpi: Make ACPI IO address space configurable Shameer Kolothum
2019-02-27 16:27 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-02-28 12:14 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-02-27 17:52 ` Auger Eric
2019-02-28 16:09 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-02-28 16:44 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2019-01-28 11:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/4] hw/arm/virt: Add GPIO based pcdimm hotplug ACPI event support Shameer Kolothum
2019-02-27 16:44 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-01-28 11:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/4] hw/arm/virt: Enable pc-dimm hotplug support Shameer Kolothum
2019-02-27 17:14 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-02-28 9:57 ` Auger Eric
2019-02-28 12:44 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-02-28 12:27 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-03-01 9:12 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-03-01 9:23 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-03-01 10:26 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-03-01 10:33 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-03-01 10:51 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-03-01 13:09 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-02-22 16:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] ARM virt: ACPI memory " Auger Eric
2019-02-22 19:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-02-25 9:54 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-02-27 12:55 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-02-27 16:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-02-27 20:14 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-02-28 10:12 ` Auger Eric
2019-02-28 12:04 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-02-28 12:27 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-02-28 13:32 ` Auger Eric
2019-02-28 13:43 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-02-28 14:02 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-03-01 13:49 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-01 17:39 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-03-05 12:14 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-02-25 9:47 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190228174424.1cae71b8@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=xuwei5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).