From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefanha@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-blk: dataplane: release AioContext before blk_set_aio_context
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:50:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190301155002.GE5861@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lg1yogej.fsf@redhat.com>
Am 01.03.2019 um 14:47 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben:
> >> Otherwise, we can simply add an extra condition at
> >> child_job_drained_poll(), before the drv->drained_poll(), to return
> >> true if the job isn't yet paused.
> >
> > Yes, I think something like this is this right fix.
>
> Fixing this has uncovered another issue also triggered by issuing
> 'block_commit' and 'device_del' consecutively. At the end, mirror_run()
> calls to bdrv_drained_begin(), which is scheduled of later (via
> bdrv_co_yield_to_drain()) as the mirror job is running in a coroutine.
>
> At the same time, the Guest requests the device to be unplugged, which
> leads to blk_unref()->blk_drain()->bdrv_do_drained_begin(). When the
> latter reaches BDRV_POLL_WHILE, the bdrv_drained_begin scheduled above
> is run, which also runs BDRV_POLL_WHILE, leading to the thread getting
> stuck in aio_poll().
>
> Is it really safe scheduling a bdrv_drained_begin() with poll == true?
I don't see what the problem would be with it in theory. Once the node
becomes idle, both the inner and the outer BDRV_POLL_WHILE() should
return.
The question with such hangs is usually, what is the condition that made
bdrv_drain_poll() return true, and why aren't we making progress so that
is would become false. With iothreads, it could also be that the
condition has actually already changed, but aio_wait_kick() wasn't
called, so aio_poll() isn't woken up.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-01 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-27 16:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-blk: dataplane: release AioContext before blk_set_aio_context Sergio Lopez
2019-02-27 17:37 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-02-28 15:01 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-02-28 15:50 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-02-28 17:04 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-02-28 17:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-02-28 18:36 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-03-01 11:44 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-03-01 13:47 ` Sergio Lopez
2019-03-01 15:50 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2019-03-06 12:47 ` Sergio Lopez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190301155002.GE5861@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=slp@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).