From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Ryr-0001Oo-N1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 03:32:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Ryn-0003pQ-FD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 03:32:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Ryd-00024u-ON for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 03:32:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 09:30:32 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?B?SuFu?= Tomko Message-ID: <20190306083032.GZ1252@lpt> References: <20181205195704.17605-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> <3571700849fab25a1bc69960ca24284f0760fe02.camel@redhat.com> <20190305143801.lq4gpetubspftkda@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <81d22ed88833ed22a1c3781c3c0c1eafad99b280.camel@redhat.com> <20190306074148.GA9131@angien.pipo.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c1qHkdEbEbCG94PZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190306074148.GA9131@angien.pipo.sk> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH for-4.0 v4 0/2] virtio: Provide version-specific variants of virtio PCI devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Krempa Cc: Andrea Bolognani , Kevin Wolf , Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , libvir-list@redhat.com, Jason Wang , Cornelia Huck , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Amit Shah , Reitz , Max@angien.pipo.sk, Caio Carrara , Gonglei , Laine Stump , Gerd Hoffmann , Stefan Hajnoczi , Cleber Rosa , Paolo Bonzini , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta --c1qHkdEbEbCG94PZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: >On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 16:56:43 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: >> On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 15:38 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >[...] > >> So I agree neither scenario is exactly perfect, but I still think >> adding non-transitional alias devices would overall be more >> user-friendly. > >I don't think it makes sense to add it at the qemu level. From libvirt's >point of view users should be shielded from any qemu impl detail or >inconsistency as libvirt is the 'user friendly'[1] layer. In qemu the >devices would be the same and thus does not make sense to do that >because it would be more confusing. > >You can argue that we should add the alias at the libvirt level though. > You can, but please don't. Jano >[1] Yes. I'm aware that statement is quite ironical. >-- >libvir-list mailing list >libvir-list@redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list --c1qHkdEbEbCG94PZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEQeJGMrnL0ADuclbP+YPwO/Mat50FAlx/hSQACgkQ+YPwO/Ma t53bBgf/c8FfX1nYaC1Ul61vNKBg33x+gi7xLYAY9LYd33Uy/i+w/ddxqOEost18 VjO+vYXlK8U1rM5Erm+cJwgArqggbJtFcBSU9Tt45vcU/n6hWdJnN1XmLmGXhyiJ 37XNv4atm4bzGQI7Vcc5XCHmelUWnuDFu+lhZdM7ow3W7lVpG8huWeKaI3xTcwdu UTP+NS3+JM8gHV9+MnVEESp30ktHbA6jLAuybxxg7qWz5w+h1cwNC6KyLABzda1k zJICbVCYngaCsiXysrOtp3k0hGj1nu5dIGHTaSWeEtvdhm34paQWdXXYQyOEj0QO GU3T9fTjjMHs8dH5dPWyo8rUtz9snw== =Xg87 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c1qHkdEbEbCG94PZ--