From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
peterx@redhat.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] iothread: create gcontext unconditionally
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:55:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190306115532.23025-1-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
v2:
- add comment in patch 4
- add another patch to comment why we need explicit aio_poll() in
iothread_run loop
When I first read the iothread code, the gcontext confused me for
quite a while. Meanwhile, I've been tackling with some races due to
this complexity as well. How much we'll pay for creating the gcontext
unconditionally? Do we really need this flexibitily (or is it really
a flexibility after all)? I don't see much gain of existing code, but
I might be wrong. Anyway, I wrote this patchset to see how the list
would think about it.
This series directly originates from previous discussion with
Marc-Andre where there's a slightly hacky way to try to acquire the
gcontext:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-02/msg05460.html
Now with this series logically above patch is not needed any more.
Please read patch 4 for more information.
And if this patchset can survive... how about running gcontext
directly in iothread_run()? I believe there could be a bit more
things to clean but I'll see.
Make check passes for me.
Comments welcomed. Thanks,
Peter Xu (5):
iothread: replace init_done_cond with a semaphore
iothread: create the gcontext unconditionally
iothread: create main loop unconditionally
iothread: push gcontext earlier in the thread_fn
iothread: document about why we need explicit aio_poll()
include/sysemu/iothread.h | 5 +--
iothread.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-06 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-06 11:55 Peter Xu [this message]
2019-03-06 11:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] iothread: replace init_done_cond with a semaphore Peter Xu
2019-03-07 3:09 ` Peter Xu
2019-03-06 11:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] iothread: create the gcontext unconditionally Peter Xu
2019-03-06 11:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] iothread: create main loop unconditionally Peter Xu
2019-03-06 11:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] iothread: push gcontext earlier in the thread_fn Peter Xu
2019-03-07 14:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-03-08 3:05 ` Peter Xu
2019-03-06 11:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] iothread: document about why we need explicit aio_poll() Peter Xu
2019-03-06 12:59 ` Marc-André Lureau
2019-03-08 10:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] iothread: create gcontext unconditionally Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190306115532.23025-1-peterx@redhat.com \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).