From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
peterx@redhat.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] iothread: replace init_done_cond with a semaphore
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:55:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190306115532.23025-2-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190306115532.23025-1-peterx@redhat.com>
Only sending an init-done message using lock+cond seems an overkill to
me. Replacing it with a simpler semaphore.
Meanwhile, init the semaphore unconditionally, then we can destroy it
unconditionally too in finalize which seems cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
include/sysemu/iothread.h | 3 +--
iothread.c | 17 ++++-------------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/sysemu/iothread.h b/include/sysemu/iothread.h
index 8a7ac2c528..50411ba54a 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/iothread.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/iothread.h
@@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ typedef struct {
GMainContext *worker_context;
GMainLoop *main_loop;
GOnce once;
- QemuMutex init_done_lock;
- QemuCond init_done_cond; /* is thread initialization done? */
+ QemuSemaphore init_done_sem; /* is thread init done? */
bool stopping; /* has iothread_stop() been called? */
bool running; /* should iothread_run() continue? */
int thread_id;
diff --git a/iothread.c b/iothread.c
index e615b7ae52..6e297e9ef1 100644
--- a/iothread.c
+++ b/iothread.c
@@ -55,10 +55,8 @@ static void *iothread_run(void *opaque)
rcu_register_thread();
my_iothread = iothread;
- qemu_mutex_lock(&iothread->init_done_lock);
iothread->thread_id = qemu_get_thread_id();
- qemu_cond_signal(&iothread->init_done_cond);
- qemu_mutex_unlock(&iothread->init_done_lock);
+ qemu_sem_post(&iothread->init_done_sem);
while (iothread->running) {
aio_poll(iothread->ctx, true);
@@ -115,6 +113,7 @@ static void iothread_instance_init(Object *obj)
iothread->poll_max_ns = IOTHREAD_POLL_MAX_NS_DEFAULT;
iothread->thread_id = -1;
+ qemu_sem_init(&iothread->init_done_sem, 0);
}
static void iothread_instance_finalize(Object *obj)
@@ -123,10 +122,6 @@ static void iothread_instance_finalize(Object *obj)
iothread_stop(iothread);
- if (iothread->thread_id != -1) {
- qemu_cond_destroy(&iothread->init_done_cond);
- qemu_mutex_destroy(&iothread->init_done_lock);
- }
/*
* Before glib2 2.33.10, there is a glib2 bug that GSource context
* pointer may not be cleared even if the context has already been
@@ -145,6 +140,7 @@ static void iothread_instance_finalize(Object *obj)
g_main_context_unref(iothread->worker_context);
iothread->worker_context = NULL;
}
+ qemu_sem_destroy(&iothread->init_done_sem);
}
static void iothread_complete(UserCreatable *obj, Error **errp)
@@ -173,8 +169,6 @@ static void iothread_complete(UserCreatable *obj, Error **errp)
return;
}
- qemu_mutex_init(&iothread->init_done_lock);
- qemu_cond_init(&iothread->init_done_cond);
iothread->once = (GOnce) G_ONCE_INIT;
/* This assumes we are called from a thread with useful CPU affinity for us
@@ -188,12 +182,9 @@ static void iothread_complete(UserCreatable *obj, Error **errp)
g_free(name);
/* Wait for initialization to complete */
- qemu_mutex_lock(&iothread->init_done_lock);
while (iothread->thread_id == -1) {
- qemu_cond_wait(&iothread->init_done_cond,
- &iothread->init_done_lock);
+ qemu_sem_wait(&iothread->init_done_sem);
}
- qemu_mutex_unlock(&iothread->init_done_lock);
}
typedef struct {
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-06 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-06 11:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] iothread: create gcontext unconditionally Peter Xu
2019-03-06 11:55 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2019-03-07 3:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] iothread: replace init_done_cond with a semaphore Peter Xu
2019-03-06 11:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] iothread: create the gcontext unconditionally Peter Xu
2019-03-06 11:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] iothread: create main loop unconditionally Peter Xu
2019-03-06 11:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] iothread: push gcontext earlier in the thread_fn Peter Xu
2019-03-07 14:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-03-08 3:05 ` Peter Xu
2019-03-06 11:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] iothread: document about why we need explicit aio_poll() Peter Xu
2019-03-06 12:59 ` Marc-André Lureau
2019-03-08 10:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] iothread: create gcontext unconditionally Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190306115532.23025-2-peterx@redhat.com \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).