qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.bennee@linaro.org, lersek@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com,
	kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 2/4] hw/block: Pad undersized read-only images with 0xFF
Date: Thu,  7 Mar 2019 10:37:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307093723.655-3-armbru@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190307093723.655-1-armbru@redhat.com>

From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

We reject undersized images.  As of the previous commit, even with a
decent error message.  Still, this is a potentially confusing
stumbling block when you move from using -bios to using -drive
if=pflash,file=blob,format=raw,readonly for loading your firmware
code. To mitigate that we automatically pad in the read-only case and
warn the user when we have performed magic to enable things to Just
Work (tm).

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
---
 hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
index 75ce8ef489..00980316dc 100644
--- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
+++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c
@@ -759,8 +759,9 @@ static void pflash_cfi01_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
     if (pfl->blk) {
         /*
          * Validate the backing store is the right size for pflash
-         * devices. If the user supplies a larger file we ignore the
-         * tail.
+         * devices. If the device is read-only we can elide the check
+         * and just pad the region first. If the user supplies a
+         * larger file we ignore the tail.
          */
         int64_t backing_len = blk_getlength(pfl->blk);
         if (backing_len < 0) {
@@ -769,10 +770,21 @@ static void pflash_cfi01_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
         }
 
         if (backing_len < total_len) {
-            error_setg(errp, "device needs %" PRIu64 " bytes, "
-                       "backing file provides only %" PRIu64 " bytes",
-                       total_len, backing_len);
-            return;
+            if (pfl->ro) {
+                size_t pad_bytes = total_len - backing_len;
+                /* pad with NOR erase pattern */
+                memset((uint8_t *)pfl->storage + backing_len,
+                       0xff, pad_bytes);
+                warn_report("device needs %" PRIu64
+                            " bytes, padded with %zu 0xff bytes",
+                            total_len, pad_bytes);
+                total_len = backing_len;
+            } else {
+                error_setg(errp, "device needs %" PRIu64 " bytes, "
+                           "backing file provides only %" PRIu64 " bytes",
+                           total_len, backing_len);
+                return;
+            }
         } else if (backing_len > total_len) {
             warn_report("device needs %" PRIu64 " bytes, rest ignored",
                         total_len);
-- 
2.17.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-07  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-07  9:37 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07  9:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] " Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 15:05   ` Alex Bennée
2019-03-07 17:14     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07  9:37 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-03-07 10:05   ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 2/4] hw/block: Pad undersized read-only images with 0xFF Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 14:55     ` Kevin Wolf
2019-03-07 17:55       ` Eric Blake
2019-03-07 17:57       ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 18:01     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-03-07  9:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 3/4] fixup! hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07  9:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 4/4] fixup! hw/block: Pad undersized read-only images with 0xFF Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07  9:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] hw/block: better reporting on pflash backing file mismatch no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190307093723.655-3-armbru@redhat.com \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).