From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, alifm@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/16] s390-bios: Refactor virtio to run channel programs via cio
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 16:37:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307163747.26d6fef0.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b67c0d7a-89a0-c61b-f082-da303eb6a830@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 10:09:46 -0500
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 3/5/19 7:30 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:59:32 -0500
> > "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Now that we have a Channel I/O library let's modify virtio boot code to
> >> make use of it for running channel programs.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
> >> index aa9da72..711daf5 100644
> >> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
> >> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
> >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >> #include "virtio.h"
> >> #include "virtio-scsi.h"
> >> #include "bswap.h"
> >> +#include "helper.h"
> >>
> >> #define VRING_WAIT_REPLY_TIMEOUT 30
> >>
> >> @@ -89,33 +90,20 @@ int drain_irqs(SubChannelId schid)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static int run_ccw(VDev *vdev, int cmd, void *ptr, int len)
> >> +static int run_ccw(VDev *vdev, int cmd, void *ptr, int len, bool sli)
> >> {
> >> Ccw1 ccw = {};
> >> - CmdOrb orb = {};
> >> - int r;
> >> -
> >> - enable_subchannel(vdev->schid);
> >> -
> >> - /* start subchannel command */
> >> - orb.fmt = 1;
> >> - orb.cpa = (u32)(long)&ccw;
> >> - orb.lpm = 0x80;
> >>
> >> ccw.cmd_code = cmd;
> >> ccw.cda = (long)ptr;
> >> ccw.count = len;
> >>
> >> - r = ssch(vdev->schid, &orb);
> >> - /*
> >> - * XXX Wait until device is done processing the CCW. For now we can
> >> - * assume that a simple tsch will have finished the CCW processing,
> >> - * but the architecture allows for asynchronous operation
> >> - */
> >> - if (!r) {
> >> - r = drain_irqs(vdev->schid);
> >> + if (sli) {
> >> + ccw.flags |= CCW_FLAG_SLI;
> >> }
> >> - return r;
> >> +
> >> + enable_subchannel(vdev->schid);
> >
> > As said, maybe just move this to the main routine, instead of having to
> > call this here again and again.
> >
>
> I can just remove this call all together, but because of the netboot case I'll need to add
> a call to enable_subchannel to virtio_is_supported() or find_net_dev().
>
> netmain.c: main -> virtio_setup-> find_net_dev-> virtio_is_supported
>
> Let me know if you like this idea or not. If you're okay with it, I'll queue it up for v4.
> IMHO, adding the call to find_net_dev makes more sense than virtio_is_supported.
I think adding the call to find_net_dev() would make sense.
>
>
> >> + return do_cio(vdev->schid, ptr2u32(&ccw), CCW_FMT1);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static void vring_init(VRing *vr, VqInfo *info)
> >
> > (...)
> >
> >> @@ -324,7 +314,8 @@ bool virtio_is_supported(SubChannelId schid)
> >> vdev.schid = schid;
> >> memset(&vdev.senseid, 0, sizeof(vdev.senseid));
> >> /* run sense id command */
> >> - if (run_ccw(&vdev, CCW_CMD_SENSE_ID, &vdev.senseid, sizeof(vdev.senseid))) {
> >> + if (run_ccw(&vdev, CCW_CMD_SENSE_ID, &vdev.senseid, sizeof(vdev.senseid),
> >> + true)) {
> >> return false;
> >> }
> >> if (vdev.senseid.cu_type == 0x3832) {
> >
> > Can't you use the new routine for obtaining the cu type here?
> >
>
> cu_type only returns the control unit type. This code goes on to look at the model number
> as well. In hind sight, I could have noticed this and simply structured my code to return
> the whole sense_id data structure. I'm not against making this change, but things seem
> pretty clean as they are. :)
I find having two different places that do SENSE_ID a bit odd :)
But no really strong opinion here; I'll happily leave the decision to
the boot code maintainers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-07 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-01 18:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/16] s390: vfio-ccw dasd ipl support Jason J. Herne
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/16] s390 vfio-ccw: Add bootindex property and IPLB data Jason J. Herne
2019-03-04 13:40 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-06 14:55 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-06 15:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-06 16:28 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-06 17:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-04 16:09 ` Farhan Ali
2019-03-06 15:16 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/16] s390-bios: decouple cio setup from virtio Jason J. Herne
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/16] s390-bios: decouple common boot logic " Jason J. Herne
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/16] s390-bios: Extend find_dev() for non-virtio devices Jason J. Herne
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/16] s390-bios: Factor finding boot device out of virtio code path Jason J. Herne
2019-03-04 17:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-04 19:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-03-05 8:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/16] s390-bios: Clean up cio.h Jason J. Herne
2019-03-04 17:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-05 5:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-03-06 18:42 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-07 8:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/16] s390-bios: Decouple channel i/o logic from virtio Jason J. Herne
2019-03-04 17:28 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/16] s390-bios: Map low core memory Jason J. Herne
2019-03-04 17:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-05 6:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-03-06 19:28 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-07 8:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-06 19:42 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/16] s390-bios: ptr2u32 and u32toptr Jason J. Herne
2019-03-05 7:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-03-07 14:11 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/16] s390-bios: Support for running format-0/1 channel programs Jason J. Herne
2019-03-04 18:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-07 19:25 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-08 9:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-05 7:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/16] s390-bios: cio error handling Jason J. Herne
2019-03-04 18:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-07 19:31 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-08 9:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/16] s390-bios: Refactor virtio to run channel programs via cio Jason J. Herne
2019-03-05 12:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-07 15:09 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-07 15:37 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/16] s390-bios: Use control unit type to determine boot method Jason J. Herne
2019-03-05 12:27 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-07 16:27 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 14/16] s390-bios: Add channel command codes/structs needed for dasd-ipl Jason J. Herne
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 15/16] s390-bios: Support booting from real dasd device Jason J. Herne
2019-03-05 13:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01 18:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 16/16] s390-bios: dasd-ipl: Use control unit type to customize error data Jason J. Herne
2019-03-04 17:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Eric Farman
2019-03-07 14:38 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-07 18:15 ` Eric Farman
2019-03-07 18:26 ` Jason J. Herne
2019-03-04 17:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-03-01 21:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/16] s390: vfio-ccw dasd ipl support no-reply
2019-03-01 21:30 ` no-reply
2019-03-01 21:35 ` no-reply
2019-03-01 21:38 ` no-reply
2019-03-01 21:45 ` no-reply
2019-03-01 21:49 ` no-reply
2019-03-04 16:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-03-04 17:53 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-03-04 17:28 ` no-reply
2019-03-04 17:51 ` no-reply
2019-03-05 5:55 ` no-reply
2019-03-05 7:30 ` no-reply
2019-03-05 8:42 ` no-reply
2019-03-05 13:08 ` no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190307163747.26d6fef0.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).