From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2YSd-0002GT-IY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 04:40:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2YSc-0005zb-Pp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 04:40:07 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:40:00 +0100 From: Niels de Vos Message-ID: <20190309094000.GB3535@ndevos-x270> References: <20190305154634.4609-1-ndevos@redhat.com> <20190308131151.GA31583@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190308131151.GA31583@localhost.localdomain> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 0/2] block: Gluster 6 compatibility List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, integration@gluster.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefano Garzarella On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 05.03.2019 um 16:46 hat Niels de Vos geschrieben: > > Gluster 6 is currently available as release candidate. There have bee= n a > > few changes to libgfapi.so that need to be adapted by consuming proje= cts > > like QEMU. Fedora Rawhide already contains glusterfs-6.0-RC0, and thi= s > > prevents rebuilds of QEMU there (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1684298)= . > >=20 > > The following two changes should be sufficient to consume Gluster 6 o= nce > > it is released. These have been tested on CentOS-7 with Gluster 5 and > > Gluster 6 (minimal manual qemu-img tests only). > >=20 > > This v2 post contains changes suggested by Daniel P. Berrang=E9 and K= evin > > Wolf. Thanks! >=20 > Thanks, applied to the block branch. Thanks! Stefano Garzarella gave a suggestion for further cleanup. I was planning to address that (no #ifdef for function arguments) next week when I'm back from a trip, Is that something you would also like to see, or do you prefer the change to stay minimal/small as it is now? I'm happy to send a followup if you agree that it is cleaner. Niels