qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	rjones@redhat.com, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	jsnow@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img: Saner printing of large file sizes
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:16:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190401131641.GJ3524@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190401130416.GC4935@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:04:16PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 30.03.2019 um 16:07 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> > Disk sizes close to INT64_MAX cause overflow, for some pretty
> > ridiculous output:
> > 
> >   $ ./nbdkit -U - memory size=$((2**63 - 512)) --run 'qemu-img info $nbd'
> >   image: nbd+unix://?socket=/tmp/nbdkitHSAzNz/socket
> >   file format: raw
> >   virtual size: -8388607T (9223372036854775296 bytes)
> >   disk size: unavailable
> > 
> > But there's no reason to have two separate implementations of integer
> > to human-readable abbreviation, where one has overflow and stops at
> > 'T', while the other avoids overflow and goes all the way to 'E'. With
> > this patch, the output now claims 8EiB instead of -8388607T, which
> > really is the correct rounding of largest file size supported by qemu
> > (we could go 511 bytes larger if we used byte-accurate sizing instead
> > of rounding up to the next sector boundary, but that wouldn't change
> > the human-readable result).
> > 
> > Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> 
> This is quite obviously a bug fix for some cases. This suggests that we
> want it in 4.0.
> 
> It is also an output change for other cases, like going from "8M" to
> "8 MiB". We probably can't tell for sure whether some tools expect the
> spelling "8M" (even if this is supposed to be the human interface and
> tools should be using JSON) or feed the change back to qemu-img or
> qemu-io (which accept "8M", but not "8 MiB" as sizes in most places).
> This suggests that we shouldn't make this change as late as -rc2.

If it breaks our own tests, then it is possible to break other tools
too.

> So what is the conclusion?

The safe option is to do the minimal fix for the existing code and look at
the refactoring in the next dev cycle.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-01 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190330150702.11687-1-eblake@redhat.com>
2019-04-01 12:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img: Saner printing of large file sizes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-01 13:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-04-01 13:16   ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2019-04-01 13:22     ` Eric Blake
2019-04-01 14:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-04-01 14:55   ` Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190401131641.GJ3524@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).