From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
rjones@redhat.com, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
jsnow@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img: Saner printing of large file sizes
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:16:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190401131641.GJ3524@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190401130416.GC4935@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:04:16PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 30.03.2019 um 16:07 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> > Disk sizes close to INT64_MAX cause overflow, for some pretty
> > ridiculous output:
> >
> > $ ./nbdkit -U - memory size=$((2**63 - 512)) --run 'qemu-img info $nbd'
> > image: nbd+unix://?socket=/tmp/nbdkitHSAzNz/socket
> > file format: raw
> > virtual size: -8388607T (9223372036854775296 bytes)
> > disk size: unavailable
> >
> > But there's no reason to have two separate implementations of integer
> > to human-readable abbreviation, where one has overflow and stops at
> > 'T', while the other avoids overflow and goes all the way to 'E'. With
> > this patch, the output now claims 8EiB instead of -8388607T, which
> > really is the correct rounding of largest file size supported by qemu
> > (we could go 511 bytes larger if we used byte-accurate sizing instead
> > of rounding up to the next sector boundary, but that wouldn't change
> > the human-readable result).
> >
> > Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>
> This is quite obviously a bug fix for some cases. This suggests that we
> want it in 4.0.
>
> It is also an output change for other cases, like going from "8M" to
> "8 MiB". We probably can't tell for sure whether some tools expect the
> spelling "8M" (even if this is supposed to be the human interface and
> tools should be using JSON) or feed the change back to qemu-img or
> qemu-io (which accept "8M", but not "8 MiB" as sizes in most places).
> This suggests that we shouldn't make this change as late as -rc2.
If it breaks our own tests, then it is possible to break other tools
too.
> So what is the conclusion?
The safe option is to do the minimal fix for the existing code and look at
the refactoring in the next dev cycle.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-01 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190330150702.11687-1-eblake@redhat.com>
2019-04-01 12:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img: Saner printing of large file sizes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-01 13:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-04-01 13:16 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2019-04-01 13:22 ` Eric Blake
2019-04-01 14:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-04-01 14:55 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190401131641.GJ3524@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).