From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rjones@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img: Saner printing of large file sizes
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:21:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190401142135.GE4935@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190330150702.11687-1-eblake@redhat.com>
Am 30.03.2019 um 16:07 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> Disk sizes close to INT64_MAX cause overflow, for some pretty
> ridiculous output:
>
> $ ./nbdkit -U - memory size=$((2**63 - 512)) --run 'qemu-img info $nbd'
> image: nbd+unix://?socket=/tmp/nbdkitHSAzNz/socket
> file format: raw
> virtual size: -8388607T (9223372036854775296 bytes)
> disk size: unavailable
>
> But there's no reason to have two separate implementations of integer
> to human-readable abbreviation, where one has overflow and stops at
> 'T', while the other avoids overflow and goes all the way to 'E'. With
> this patch, the output now claims 8EiB instead of -8388607T, which
> really is the correct rounding of largest file size supported by qemu
> (we could go 511 bytes larger if we used byte-accurate sizing instead
> of rounding up to the next sector boundary, but that wouldn't change
> the human-readable result).
>
> Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Thanks, applied to the block-next branch for 4.1.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-01 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190330150702.11687-1-eblake@redhat.com>
2019-04-01 12:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-img: Saner printing of large file sizes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-01 13:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-04-01 13:16 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-01 13:22 ` Eric Blake
2019-04-01 14:21 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2019-04-01 14:55 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190401142135.GE4935@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).