From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBx7y-0001tp-Mq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 03:49:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBx7x-0001kq-95 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 03:49:38 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::232]:33790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBx7w-0001iB-To for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 03:49:37 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id f23so1226900ljc.0 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:49:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Randrianasulu Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:44:49 +0300 References: <201904041010.10367.randrianasulu@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201904041044.49806.randrianasulu@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Proof of concept for GPU forwarding for Linux guest on Linux host List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Tao Wu(=?utf-8?q?=E5=90=B4=E6=B6=9B?=@Eng)" Cc: QEMU =D0=92 =D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B8 =D0=BE=D1=82 = Thursday 04 April 2019 10:33:55 Tao Wu(=E5=90=B4=E6=B6=9B@Eng) =D0=BD=D0=B0= =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB(=D0=B0): > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 12:15 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < > randrianasulu@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > > Hi! > > > > I recall I saw something like this some time ago (but in connection with > > qemu-user + ALSA sycallls) > > So far I found this: > > > > https://marc.info/?l=3Dqemu-devel&m=3D154349285205915 > > > > List: qemu-devel > > Subject: [Qemu-devel] Support for Intel GPU > > From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen > > Date: 2018-11-29 11:54:19 > > > > Ah, found alsa bits too: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg05334.html >=20 > Thanks, I took a look, the previous patches are targeting qemu user mode > while mine is targeting full system virtualization. > There is no plan to merge my code as it is now. I just want to get some > feedbacks first. I was thinking qemu's system mode was covered already by https://www.kraxel.org/blog/2018/04/vgpu-display-support-finally-merged-ups= tream/ (intel's vGPU) https://www.kraxel.org/blog/2016/09/using-virtio-gpu-with-libvirt-and-spice/ (virtio-gpu, via gallium framework) ? But thanks anyway, may be some of those ideas can be fused together (I only= have nvidia/nouveau GPU,=20 and at best can forward-port something simple) >=20 >=20 > > > > > > None of this was merged, as far as I understand. > > >=20