From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> To: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>, "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, like.xu@intel.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] cpu/topology: add uncommon arch support for smp machine properties Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:54:24 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190408145424.45af3db8@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1553849325-44201-4-git-send-email-like.xu@linux.intel.com> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 16:48:39 +0800 Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> wrote: here should be a commit message explaining what patch does in more detail. > Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Generic note, try not call qdev_get_machine() every time you replace smp_cpus or other variables. It's often possible to pass MachineState via call chain with trivial fixups. > --- > hw/alpha/dp264.c | 1 + > hw/hppa/machine.c | 4 ++++ > hw/mips/boston.c | 1 + > hw/mips/mips_malta.c | 9 +++++++++ > hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 2 ++ > hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 2 ++ > hw/xtensa/sim.c | 1 + > hw/xtensa/xtfpga.c | 1 + > 8 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/alpha/dp264.c b/hw/alpha/dp264.c > index 0347eb8..ee5d432 100644 > --- a/hw/alpha/dp264.c > +++ b/hw/alpha/dp264.c > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static void clipper_init(MachineState *machine) > char *palcode_filename; > uint64_t palcode_entry, palcode_low, palcode_high; > uint64_t kernel_entry, kernel_low, kernel_high; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > > /* Create up to 4 cpus. */ > memset(cpus, 0, sizeof(cpus)); > diff --git a/hw/hppa/machine.c b/hw/hppa/machine.c > index d1b1d3c..f652891 100644 > --- a/hw/hppa/machine.c > +++ b/hw/hppa/machine.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include "hw/ide.h" > #include "hw/timer/i8254.h" > #include "hw/char/serial.h" > +#include "hw/boards.h" > #include "hppa_sys.h" > #include "qemu/units.h" > #include "qapi/error.h" > @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ static void machine_hppa_init(MachineState *machine) > MemoryRegion *ram_region; > MemoryRegion *cpu_region; > long i; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; I'd prefer to replace smp_cpus with machine->topo.smp_cpus directly at places it's used, as it makes affected sites more visible in the patch. And use local smp_cpus only in places where using machine->topo.smp_cpus makes core less readable. (but it's just personal preference so I don't insist on it) > > ram_size = machine->ram_size; > > @@ -242,7 +244,9 @@ static void machine_hppa_init(MachineState *machine) > > static void hppa_machine_reset(void) > { > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); > int i; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = ms->topo.smp_cpus; ***) It would be better to pass MachineState as argument to hppa_machine_reset(), a patch to so should go before this one. Quick look shows only 3 overrides (hppa, pc, pnv) and one caller, so I'd rather fix it than calling qdev_get_machine() unnecessarily > > qemu_devices_reset(); > > diff --git a/hw/mips/boston.c b/hw/mips/boston.c > index e5bab3c..7752c10 100644 > --- a/hw/mips/boston.c > +++ b/hw/mips/boston.c > @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ static void boston_mach_init(MachineState *machine) > DriveInfo *hd[6]; > Chardev *chr; > int fw_size, fit_err; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > bool is_64b; > > if ((machine->ram_size % GiB) || > diff --git a/hw/mips/mips_malta.c b/hw/mips/mips_malta.c > index 439665a..d595375 100644 > --- a/hw/mips/mips_malta.c > +++ b/hw/mips/mips_malta.c > @@ -1095,6 +1095,8 @@ static int64_t load_kernel (void) > > static void malta_mips_config(MIPSCPU *cpu) > { > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); > + unsigned int smp_cpus = ms->topo.smp_cpus; > CPUMIPSState *env = &cpu->env; > CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); this one also called from reset, so the same [***] applies here too. > > @@ -1127,9 +1129,11 @@ static void main_cpu_reset(void *opaque) > static void create_cpu_without_cps(const char *cpu_type, > qemu_irq *cbus_irq, qemu_irq *i8259_irq) > { > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); caller has an access to MachineState so pass it down call chain all the way > CPUMIPSState *env; > MIPSCPU *cpu; > int i; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = ms->topo.smp_cpus; > > for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) { > cpu = MIPS_CPU(cpu_create(cpu_type)); > @@ -1149,7 +1153,9 @@ static void create_cpu_without_cps(const char *cpu_type, > static void create_cps(MaltaState *s, const char *cpu_type, > qemu_irq *cbus_irq, qemu_irq *i8259_irq) > { > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); ditto > Error *err = NULL; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = ms->topo.smp_cpus; > > s->cps = MIPS_CPS(object_new(TYPE_MIPS_CPS)); > qdev_set_parent_bus(DEVICE(s->cps), sysbus_get_default()); > @@ -1171,6 +1177,9 @@ static void create_cps(MaltaState *s, const char *cpu_type, > static void mips_create_cpu(MaltaState *s, const char *cpu_type, > qemu_irq *cbus_irq, qemu_irq *i8259_irq) > { > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); ditto > + unsigned int smp_cpus = ms->topo.smp_cpus; > + > if ((smp_cpus > 1) && cpu_supports_cps_smp(cpu_type)) { > create_cps(s, cpu_type, cbus_irq, i8259_irq); > } else { > diff --git a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c > index ca1e382..2321cfb 100644 > --- a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c > +++ b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c > @@ -853,6 +853,8 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef, > unsigned int num_vsimms; > DeviceState *dev; > SysBusDevice *s; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > + unsigned int max_cpus = machine->topo.max_cpus; > > /* init CPUs */ > for(i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) { > diff --git a/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c b/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c > index 399f2d7..d089c4d 100644 > --- a/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c > +++ b/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c > @@ -546,6 +546,8 @@ static void sun4uv_init(MemoryRegion *address_space_mem, > NICInfo *nd; > MACAddr macaddr; > bool onboard_nic; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > + unsigned int max_cpus = machine->topo.max_cpus; > > /* init CPUs */ > cpu = sparc64_cpu_devinit(machine->cpu_type, hwdef->prom_addr); > diff --git a/hw/xtensa/sim.c b/hw/xtensa/sim.c > index 12c7437..cc0396b 100644 > --- a/hw/xtensa/sim.c > +++ b/hw/xtensa/sim.c > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static void xtensa_sim_init(MachineState *machine) > ram_addr_t ram_size = machine->ram_size; > const char *kernel_filename = machine->kernel_filename; > int n; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > > for (n = 0; n < smp_cpus; n++) { > cpu = XTENSA_CPU(cpu_create(machine->cpu_type)); > diff --git a/hw/xtensa/xtfpga.c b/hw/xtensa/xtfpga.c > index e05ef75..f71a15e 100644 > --- a/hw/xtensa/xtfpga.c > +++ b/hw/xtensa/xtfpga.c > @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ static void xtfpga_init(const XtfpgaBoardDesc *board, MachineState *machine) > const unsigned system_io_size = 224 * MiB; > uint32_t freq = 10000000; > int n; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > > if (smp_cpus > 1) { > mx_pic = xtensa_mx_pic_init(31);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> To: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, like.xu@intel.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] cpu/topology: add uncommon arch support for smp machine properties Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:54:24 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190408145424.45af3db8@redhat.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20190408125424.tn1nHBg_I4EKKyB8b60XeHD6HTXoitXQUgNfhoDKIgY@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1553849325-44201-4-git-send-email-like.xu@linux.intel.com> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 16:48:39 +0800 Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> wrote: here should be a commit message explaining what patch does in more detail. > Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com> Generic note, try not call qdev_get_machine() every time you replace smp_cpus or other variables. It's often possible to pass MachineState via call chain with trivial fixups. > --- > hw/alpha/dp264.c | 1 + > hw/hppa/machine.c | 4 ++++ > hw/mips/boston.c | 1 + > hw/mips/mips_malta.c | 9 +++++++++ > hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 2 ++ > hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 2 ++ > hw/xtensa/sim.c | 1 + > hw/xtensa/xtfpga.c | 1 + > 8 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/hw/alpha/dp264.c b/hw/alpha/dp264.c > index 0347eb8..ee5d432 100644 > --- a/hw/alpha/dp264.c > +++ b/hw/alpha/dp264.c > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static void clipper_init(MachineState *machine) > char *palcode_filename; > uint64_t palcode_entry, palcode_low, palcode_high; > uint64_t kernel_entry, kernel_low, kernel_high; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > > /* Create up to 4 cpus. */ > memset(cpus, 0, sizeof(cpus)); > diff --git a/hw/hppa/machine.c b/hw/hppa/machine.c > index d1b1d3c..f652891 100644 > --- a/hw/hppa/machine.c > +++ b/hw/hppa/machine.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include "hw/ide.h" > #include "hw/timer/i8254.h" > #include "hw/char/serial.h" > +#include "hw/boards.h" > #include "hppa_sys.h" > #include "qemu/units.h" > #include "qapi/error.h" > @@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ static void machine_hppa_init(MachineState *machine) > MemoryRegion *ram_region; > MemoryRegion *cpu_region; > long i; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; I'd prefer to replace smp_cpus with machine->topo.smp_cpus directly at places it's used, as it makes affected sites more visible in the patch. And use local smp_cpus only in places where using machine->topo.smp_cpus makes core less readable. (but it's just personal preference so I don't insist on it) > > ram_size = machine->ram_size; > > @@ -242,7 +244,9 @@ static void machine_hppa_init(MachineState *machine) > > static void hppa_machine_reset(void) > { > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); > int i; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = ms->topo.smp_cpus; ***) It would be better to pass MachineState as argument to hppa_machine_reset(), a patch to so should go before this one. Quick look shows only 3 overrides (hppa, pc, pnv) and one caller, so I'd rather fix it than calling qdev_get_machine() unnecessarily > > qemu_devices_reset(); > > diff --git a/hw/mips/boston.c b/hw/mips/boston.c > index e5bab3c..7752c10 100644 > --- a/hw/mips/boston.c > +++ b/hw/mips/boston.c > @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ static void boston_mach_init(MachineState *machine) > DriveInfo *hd[6]; > Chardev *chr; > int fw_size, fit_err; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > bool is_64b; > > if ((machine->ram_size % GiB) || > diff --git a/hw/mips/mips_malta.c b/hw/mips/mips_malta.c > index 439665a..d595375 100644 > --- a/hw/mips/mips_malta.c > +++ b/hw/mips/mips_malta.c > @@ -1095,6 +1095,8 @@ static int64_t load_kernel (void) > > static void malta_mips_config(MIPSCPU *cpu) > { > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); > + unsigned int smp_cpus = ms->topo.smp_cpus; > CPUMIPSState *env = &cpu->env; > CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu); this one also called from reset, so the same [***] applies here too. > > @@ -1127,9 +1129,11 @@ static void main_cpu_reset(void *opaque) > static void create_cpu_without_cps(const char *cpu_type, > qemu_irq *cbus_irq, qemu_irq *i8259_irq) > { > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); caller has an access to MachineState so pass it down call chain all the way > CPUMIPSState *env; > MIPSCPU *cpu; > int i; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = ms->topo.smp_cpus; > > for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) { > cpu = MIPS_CPU(cpu_create(cpu_type)); > @@ -1149,7 +1153,9 @@ static void create_cpu_without_cps(const char *cpu_type, > static void create_cps(MaltaState *s, const char *cpu_type, > qemu_irq *cbus_irq, qemu_irq *i8259_irq) > { > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); ditto > Error *err = NULL; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = ms->topo.smp_cpus; > > s->cps = MIPS_CPS(object_new(TYPE_MIPS_CPS)); > qdev_set_parent_bus(DEVICE(s->cps), sysbus_get_default()); > @@ -1171,6 +1177,9 @@ static void create_cps(MaltaState *s, const char *cpu_type, > static void mips_create_cpu(MaltaState *s, const char *cpu_type, > qemu_irq *cbus_irq, qemu_irq *i8259_irq) > { > + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); ditto > + unsigned int smp_cpus = ms->topo.smp_cpus; > + > if ((smp_cpus > 1) && cpu_supports_cps_smp(cpu_type)) { > create_cps(s, cpu_type, cbus_irq, i8259_irq); > } else { > diff --git a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c > index ca1e382..2321cfb 100644 > --- a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c > +++ b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c > @@ -853,6 +853,8 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef *hwdef, > unsigned int num_vsimms; > DeviceState *dev; > SysBusDevice *s; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > + unsigned int max_cpus = machine->topo.max_cpus; > > /* init CPUs */ > for(i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) { > diff --git a/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c b/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c > index 399f2d7..d089c4d 100644 > --- a/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c > +++ b/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c > @@ -546,6 +546,8 @@ static void sun4uv_init(MemoryRegion *address_space_mem, > NICInfo *nd; > MACAddr macaddr; > bool onboard_nic; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > + unsigned int max_cpus = machine->topo.max_cpus; > > /* init CPUs */ > cpu = sparc64_cpu_devinit(machine->cpu_type, hwdef->prom_addr); > diff --git a/hw/xtensa/sim.c b/hw/xtensa/sim.c > index 12c7437..cc0396b 100644 > --- a/hw/xtensa/sim.c > +++ b/hw/xtensa/sim.c > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static void xtensa_sim_init(MachineState *machine) > ram_addr_t ram_size = machine->ram_size; > const char *kernel_filename = machine->kernel_filename; > int n; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > > for (n = 0; n < smp_cpus; n++) { > cpu = XTENSA_CPU(cpu_create(machine->cpu_type)); > diff --git a/hw/xtensa/xtfpga.c b/hw/xtensa/xtfpga.c > index e05ef75..f71a15e 100644 > --- a/hw/xtensa/xtfpga.c > +++ b/hw/xtensa/xtfpga.c > @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ static void xtfpga_init(const XtfpgaBoardDesc *board, MachineState *machine) > const unsigned system_io_size = 224 * MiB; > uint32_t freq = 10000000; > int n; > + unsigned int smp_cpus = machine->topo.smp_cpus; > > if (smp_cpus > 1) { > mx_pic = xtensa_mx_pic_init(31);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 12:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <1553849325-44201-1-git-send-email-like.xu@linux.intel.com> [not found] ` <20190329112152.0c7ad147@redhat.com> 2019-04-04 3:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] refactor cpu topo into machine properties Like Xu 2019-04-08 13:26 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-08 13:26 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-08 14:38 ` Like Xu 2019-04-08 14:38 ` Like Xu [not found] ` <1553849325-44201-2-git-send-email-like.xu@linux.intel.com> 2019-04-04 11:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] cpu/topology: add struct CpuTopology to MachineState Igor Mammedov [not found] ` <1553849325-44201-3-git-send-email-like.xu@linux.intel.com> 2019-04-04 14:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] cpu/topology: add general support for machine properties Igor Mammedov 2019-04-04 16:21 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert 2019-04-30 7:30 ` Like Xu 2019-04-30 7:30 ` Like Xu 2019-05-02 15:09 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-05-02 15:09 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-05-03 1:08 ` Eduardo Habkost 2019-05-03 1:08 ` Eduardo Habkost 2019-05-03 1:01 ` Eduardo Habkost 2019-05-03 1:01 ` Eduardo Habkost [not found] ` <1553849325-44201-4-git-send-email-like.xu@linux.intel.com> 2019-04-08 12:54 ` Igor Mammedov [this message] 2019-04-08 12:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] cpu/topology: add uncommon arch support for smp " Igor Mammedov 2019-04-16 8:47 ` Like Xu 2019-04-16 8:47 ` Like Xu 2019-04-16 12:00 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-16 12:00 ` Igor Mammedov [not found] ` <1553849325-44201-5-git-send-email-like.xu@linux.intel.com> [not found] ` <87h8bmuj2d.fsf@zen.linaroharston> [not found] ` <2546bf3e-2009-5a76-bc63-0ad73d333a78@linux.intel.com> 2019-04-01 23:38 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] cpu/topology: add ARM " Eduardo Habkost 2019-04-02 2:35 ` Like Xu 2019-04-02 4:45 ` Peter Maydell 2019-04-02 5:20 ` Like Xu 2019-04-02 5:27 ` Peter Maydell 2019-04-08 13:11 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-08 13:11 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190408145424.45af3db8@redhat.com \ --to=imammedo@redhat.com \ --cc=berrange@redhat.com \ --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \ --cc=like.xu@intel.com \ --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).