From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0] migration/ram.c: Fix use-after-free in multifd_recv_unfill_packet() Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:18:30 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190409151830.6024-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> (raw) Coverity points out (CID 1400442) that in this code: if (packet->pages_alloc > p->pages->allocated) { multifd_pages_clear(p->pages); multifd_pages_init(packet->pages_alloc); } we free p->pages in multifd_pages_clear() but continue to use it in the following code. We also leak memory, because multifd_pages_init() returns the pointer to a new MultiFDPages_t struct but we are ignoring its return value. Fix both of these bugs by adding the missing assignment of the newly created struct to p->pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> --- I don't know anything about the multifd code, but this seems like the obvious fix based on looking at what the clear and init functions are doing. I have only run 'make check' on this, so review and testing definitely in order. I think we should really put this into 4.0, which means ideally I'd like to commit it to master today or tomorrow, though... --- migration/ram.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c index f68beeeeffc..1ca9ba77b6a 100644 --- a/migration/ram.c +++ b/migration/ram.c @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static int multifd_recv_unfill_packet(MultiFDRecvParams *p, Error **errp) */ if (packet->pages_alloc > p->pages->allocated) { multifd_pages_clear(p->pages); - multifd_pages_init(packet->pages_alloc); + p->pages = multifd_pages_init(packet->pages_alloc); } p->pages->used = be32_to_cpu(packet->pages_used); -- 2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0] migration/ram.c: Fix use-after-free in multifd_recv_unfill_packet() Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:18:30 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190409151830.6024-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> (raw) Message-ID: <20190409151830.WtP5tBvvwG_Lu3OOcOuWMrd6rbwm3Ln6bH6H9_ByYDk@z> (raw) Coverity points out (CID 1400442) that in this code: if (packet->pages_alloc > p->pages->allocated) { multifd_pages_clear(p->pages); multifd_pages_init(packet->pages_alloc); } we free p->pages in multifd_pages_clear() but continue to use it in the following code. We also leak memory, because multifd_pages_init() returns the pointer to a new MultiFDPages_t struct but we are ignoring its return value. Fix both of these bugs by adding the missing assignment of the newly created struct to p->pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> --- I don't know anything about the multifd code, but this seems like the obvious fix based on looking at what the clear and init functions are doing. I have only run 'make check' on this, so review and testing definitely in order. I think we should really put this into 4.0, which means ideally I'd like to commit it to master today or tomorrow, though... --- migration/ram.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c index f68beeeeffc..1ca9ba77b6a 100644 --- a/migration/ram.c +++ b/migration/ram.c @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static int multifd_recv_unfill_packet(MultiFDRecvParams *p, Error **errp) */ if (packet->pages_alloc > p->pages->allocated) { multifd_pages_clear(p->pages); - multifd_pages_init(packet->pages_alloc); + p->pages = multifd_pages_init(packet->pages_alloc); } p->pages->used = be32_to_cpu(packet->pages_used); -- 2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-09 15:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-09 15:18 Peter Maydell [this message] 2019-04-09 15:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0] migration/ram.c: Fix use-after-free in multifd_recv_unfill_packet() Peter Maydell 2019-04-09 15:46 ` Juan Quintela 2019-04-09 15:46 ` Juan Quintela 2019-04-09 19:47 ` Peter Maydell 2019-04-09 19:47 ` Peter Maydell 2019-04-09 18:49 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2019-04-09 18:49 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190409151830.6024-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org \ --to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \ --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=quintela@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).