qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0] hw/i386/pc: Fix crash when hot-plugging nvdimm on older machine types
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:56:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190411015619.GA9198@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408212911.jiqdva62ddebndut@master>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:29:11PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thomas,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for pointing this out, while I have some different idea on how to fix
>>> this.
>>> 
>>> The reason of the core dump is errp already been set in
>>> hotplug_handler_pre_plug(), and this function check acpi hotplug capability.
>>> The order of this check is correct, while we should  return when errp is set
>>> in hotplug_handler_pre_plug().
>>> 
>>> I got a fix like this, which I have tested and looks good to me.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
>>> index 6077d27361..b11f3b15c1 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
>>> @@ -2091,6 +2091,9 @@ static void pc_memory_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
>>>      }
>>>  
>>>      hotplug_handler_pre_plug(pcms->acpi_dev, dev, errp);
>>> +    if (*errp) {
>>> +        return;
>>> +    }
>>
>>Not sure, but I think you can not rely on the fact that the caller set
>>*errp = NULL already... that's why it is more common to use a local_err
>>variable and error_propagate() for such cases (which is what I did in my
>>patch).
>>
>
>Ok, that's fine for me.
>
>>Also, why don't you want the "nvdimm is not enabled: missing 'nvdimm' in
>>'-M'" check to be done first?
>>
>
>Because this function pc_memory_pre_plug() will be called not only when
>nvdimm is hot-plugged but also dimm is hot-plugged. And
>hotplug_handler_pre_plug() here is to check the acpi(if it has) hot-plug
>capability.
>
>So the check in pc_memory_pre_plug() is from generic to specific: 
>    1. Do we have capability to hot-plug?
>    2. If the device is nvdimm, do we enabled nvdimm?
>

Thomas

Do you think this is a reasonable explanation?

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0] hw/i386/pc: Fix crash when hot-plugging nvdimm on older machine types
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:56:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190411015619.GA9198@richard> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190411015619.0a8NGU4Khfv2p_jRFqFUCaHJDAGV7vw0Vn18RNkVHNY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408212911.jiqdva62ddebndut@master>

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:29:11PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thomas,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for pointing this out, while I have some different idea on how to fix
>>> this.
>>> 
>>> The reason of the core dump is errp already been set in
>>> hotplug_handler_pre_plug(), and this function check acpi hotplug capability.
>>> The order of this check is correct, while we should  return when errp is set
>>> in hotplug_handler_pre_plug().
>>> 
>>> I got a fix like this, which I have tested and looks good to me.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
>>> index 6077d27361..b11f3b15c1 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
>>> @@ -2091,6 +2091,9 @@ static void pc_memory_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
>>>      }
>>>  
>>>      hotplug_handler_pre_plug(pcms->acpi_dev, dev, errp);
>>> +    if (*errp) {
>>> +        return;
>>> +    }
>>
>>Not sure, but I think you can not rely on the fact that the caller set
>>*errp = NULL already... that's why it is more common to use a local_err
>>variable and error_propagate() for such cases (which is what I did in my
>>patch).
>>
>
>Ok, that's fine for me.
>
>>Also, why don't you want the "nvdimm is not enabled: missing 'nvdimm' in
>>'-M'" check to be done first?
>>
>
>Because this function pc_memory_pre_plug() will be called not only when
>nvdimm is hot-plugged but also dimm is hot-plugged. And
>hotplug_handler_pre_plug() here is to check the acpi(if it has) hot-plug
>capability.
>
>So the check in pc_memory_pre_plug() is from generic to specific: 
>    1. Do we have capability to hot-plug?
>    2. If the device is nvdimm, do we enabled nvdimm?
>

Thomas

Do you think this is a reasonable explanation?

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-11  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-07  9:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0] hw/i386/pc: Fix crash when hot-plugging nvdimm on older machine types Thomas Huth
2019-04-07  9:23 ` Thomas Huth
2019-04-08 10:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-08 10:46   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-04-08 13:45 ` Wei Yang
2019-04-08 13:45   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-08 15:06   ` Thomas Huth
2019-04-08 15:06     ` Thomas Huth
2019-04-08 21:29     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-08 21:29       ` Wei Yang
2019-04-11  1:56       ` Wei Yang [this message]
2019-04-11  1:56         ` Wei Yang
2019-04-11  4:50         ` Thomas Huth
2019-04-11  4:50           ` Thomas Huth
2019-04-08 22:26     ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-04-08 22:26       ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-04-09  5:57       ` Markus Armbruster
2019-04-09  5:57         ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190411015619.GA9198@richard \
    --to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).