From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Yury Kotov <yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"yc-core@yandex-team.ru" <yc-core@yandex-team.ru>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: Fix handling fd protocol
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:47:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190415104725.GI5718@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <259551555324396@vla1-1374b6242101.qloud-c.yandex.net>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 01:33:21PM +0300, Yury Kotov wrote:
> 15.04.2019, 13:25, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 01:17:06PM +0300, Yury Kotov wrote:
> >> 15.04.2019, 13:11, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:50:08PM +0300, Yury Kotov wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Just to clarify. I see two possible solutions:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1) Since the migration code doesn't receive fd, it isn't responsible for
> >> >> closing it. So, it may be better to use migrate_fd_param for both
> >> >> incoming/outgoing and add dupping for migrate_fd_param. Thus, clients must
> >> >> close the fd themselves. But existing clients will have a leak.
> >> >
> >> > We can't break existing clients in this way as they are correctly
> >> > using the monitor with its current semantics.
> >> >
> >> >> 2) If we don't duplicate fd, then at least we should remove fd from
> >> >> the corresponding list. Therefore, the solution is to fix qemu_close to find
> >> >> the list and remove fd from it. But qemu_close is currently consistent with
> >> >> qemu_open (which opens/dups fd), so adding additional logic might not be
> >> >> a very good idea.
> >> >
> >> > qemu_close is not appropriate place to deal with something speciifc
> >> > to the montor.
> >> >
> >> >> I don't see any other solution, but I might miss something.
> >> >> What do you think?
> >> >
> >> > All callers of monitor_get_fd() will close() the FD they get back.
> >> > Thus monitor_get_fd() should remove it from the list when it returns
> >> > it, and we should add API docs to monitor_get_fd() to explain this.
> >> >
> >> Ok, it sounds reasonable. But monitor_get_fd is only about outgoing migration.
> >> But what about the incoming migration? It doesn't use monitor_get_fd but just
> >> converts input string to int and use it as fd.
> >
> > The incoming migration expects the FD to be passed into QEMU by the mgmt
> > app when it is exec'ing the QEMU binary. It doesn't interact with the
> > monitor at all AFAIR.
> >
>
> Oh, sorry. This use case is not obvious. We used add-fd to pass fd for
> migrate-incoming and such way has described problems.
That's a bug in your usage of QEMU IMHO, as the incoming code is not
designed to use add-fd.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Yury Kotov <yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"yc-core@yandex-team.ru" <yc-core@yandex-team.ru>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: Fix handling fd protocol
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:47:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190415104725.GI5718@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190415104725.64kMwQmLLJArqHONpMbuj9PO9YpsJ3TE6OJ2vQksKTg@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <259551555324396@vla1-1374b6242101.qloud-c.yandex.net>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 01:33:21PM +0300, Yury Kotov wrote:
> 15.04.2019, 13:25, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 01:17:06PM +0300, Yury Kotov wrote:
> >> 15.04.2019, 13:11, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:50:08PM +0300, Yury Kotov wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Just to clarify. I see two possible solutions:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1) Since the migration code doesn't receive fd, it isn't responsible for
> >> >> closing it. So, it may be better to use migrate_fd_param for both
> >> >> incoming/outgoing and add dupping for migrate_fd_param. Thus, clients must
> >> >> close the fd themselves. But existing clients will have a leak.
> >> >
> >> > We can't break existing clients in this way as they are correctly
> >> > using the monitor with its current semantics.
> >> >
> >> >> 2) If we don't duplicate fd, then at least we should remove fd from
> >> >> the corresponding list. Therefore, the solution is to fix qemu_close to find
> >> >> the list and remove fd from it. But qemu_close is currently consistent with
> >> >> qemu_open (which opens/dups fd), so adding additional logic might not be
> >> >> a very good idea.
> >> >
> >> > qemu_close is not appropriate place to deal with something speciifc
> >> > to the montor.
> >> >
> >> >> I don't see any other solution, but I might miss something.
> >> >> What do you think?
> >> >
> >> > All callers of monitor_get_fd() will close() the FD they get back.
> >> > Thus monitor_get_fd() should remove it from the list when it returns
> >> > it, and we should add API docs to monitor_get_fd() to explain this.
> >> >
> >> Ok, it sounds reasonable. But monitor_get_fd is only about outgoing migration.
> >> But what about the incoming migration? It doesn't use monitor_get_fd but just
> >> converts input string to int and use it as fd.
> >
> > The incoming migration expects the FD to be passed into QEMU by the mgmt
> > app when it is exec'ing the QEMU binary. It doesn't interact with the
> > monitor at all AFAIR.
> >
>
> Oh, sorry. This use case is not obvious. We used add-fd to pass fd for
> migrate-incoming and such way has described problems.
That's a bug in your usage of QEMU IMHO, as the incoming code is not
designed to use add-fd.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-15 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 9:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: Fix handling fd protocol Yury Kotov
2019-04-10 9:26 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-10 10:13 ` no-reply
2019-04-10 10:13 ` no-reply
2019-04-10 13:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-10 13:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-10 14:16 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-10 14:16 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-11 12:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-11 12:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-11 12:31 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-11 12:31 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-11 12:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-11 12:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-11 12:50 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-11 12:50 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-15 9:50 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-15 9:50 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-15 10:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-15 10:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-15 10:17 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-15 10:17 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-15 10:24 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-15 10:24 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-15 10:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-15 10:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-15 10:33 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-15 10:33 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-15 10:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2019-04-15 10:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-15 11:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-15 11:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-15 11:19 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-15 11:19 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-15 11:30 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-15 11:30 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-15 12:20 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-15 12:20 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-16 9:27 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-16 9:27 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-16 11:01 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-16 11:01 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-18 14:19 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-18 14:19 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-18 15:36 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-18 15:36 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-18 16:03 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-18 16:03 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-18 16:25 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-18 16:25 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-18 17:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-18 17:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-18 17:46 ` Yury Kotov
2019-04-18 17:46 ` Yury Kotov
2019-05-14 9:36 ` Yury Kotov
2019-05-21 16:09 ` Yury Kotov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190415104725.GI5718@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=yc-core@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=yury-kotov@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).