qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"cjia@nvidia.com" <cjia@nvidia.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"aik@ozlabs.ru" <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	"Zhengxiao.zx@alibaba-inc.com" <Zhengxiao.zx@alibaba-inc.com>,
	"shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com" <shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"kwankhede@nvidia.com" <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	"eauger@redhat.com" <eauger@redhat.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"eskultet@redhat.com" <eskultet@redhat.com>,
	"Yang, Ziye" <ziye.yang@intel.com>,
	"mlevitsk@redhat.com" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	"pasic@linux.ibm.com" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	"libvir-list@redhat.com" <libvir-list@redhat.com>,
	"arei.gonglei@huawei.com" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	"felipe@nutanix.com" <felipe@nutanix.com>,
	"Ken.Xue@amd.com" <Ken.Xue@amd.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"dgilbert@redhat.com" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	"zhenyuw@linux.intel.com" <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	"intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Liu, Changpeng" <changpeng.liu@intel.com>,
	"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
	"jonathan.davies@nutanix.com" <jonathan.davies@nutanix.com>,
	"He, Shaopeng" <shaopeng.he@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vfio/mdev: add version field as mandatory attribute for mdev device
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:33:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424033346.GC26247@joy-OptiPlex-7040> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423102419.GE6022@redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 06:24:19PM +0800, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 01:41:57AM -0400, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 09:21:00AM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 21:01:52 -0400
> > > Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:39:50PM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 04:35:04 -0400
> > > > > Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > device version attribute in mdev sysfs is used by user space software
> > > > > > (e.g. libvirt) to query device compatibility for live migration of VFIO
> > > > > > mdev devices. This attribute is mandatory if a mdev device supports live
> > > > > > migration.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Subject: doesn't quite match what's being proposed here.
> > > > >
> > > > > > It consists of two parts: common part and vendor proprietary part.
> > > > > > common part: 32 bit. lower 16 bits is vendor id and higher 16 bits
> > > > > >              identifies device type. e.g., for pci device, it is
> > > > > >              "pci vendor id" | (VFIO_DEVICE_FLAGS_PCI << 16).
> > > > >
> > > > > What purpose does this serve?  If it's intended as some sort of
> > > > > namespace feature, shouldn't we first assume that we can only support
> > > > > migration to devices of the same type?  Therefore each type would
> > > > > already have its own namespace.  Also that would make the trailing bit
> > > > > of the version string listed below in the example redundant.  A vendor
> > > > > is still welcome to include this in their version string if they wish,
> > > > > but I think the string should be entirely vendor defined.
> > > > >
> > > > hi Alex,
> > > > This common part is a kind of namespace.
> > > > Because if version string is entirely defined by vendors, I'm worried about
> > > > if there is a case that one vendor's version string happens to deceive and
> > > > interfere with another vendor's version checking?
> > > > e.g.
> > > > vendor A has a version string like: vendor id + device id + mdev type
> > > > vendor B has a version string like: device id + vendor id + mdev type
> > > > but vendor A's vendor id is 0x8086, device id is 0x1217
> > > > vendor B's vendor id is 0x1217, device id is 0x8086.
> > > >
> > > > In this corner case, the two vendors may regard the two device is
> > > > migratable but actually they are not.
> > > >
> > > > That's the reason for this common part that serve as a kind of namespace
> > > > that all vendors will comply with to avoid overlap.
> > >
> > > If we assume that migration can only occur between matching mdev types,
> > > this is redundant, each type already has their own namespace.
> > >
> > hi Alex,
> > do you mean user space software like libvirt needs to first check whether
> > mdev type is matching and then check whether version is matching?
> 
> I would expect that libvirt (or other mgmt apps) will always first
> check that the vendor id, device id, mdev type all match. So for the
> version string it should suffice to be a "normal" numeric value.
> 
> Essentially version string just needs to be there to distinguish
> revisions of the same mdev type over time.
>
hi Daniel,
The way that user space software checks that the vendor id, device id, mdev
type all match and version string is just revisions is somewhat restrictive?
user space software could not have so much detailed information regarding to
which devices are compatible, especially when vendor id, device id,
revision id, and mdev types are not enough or no need to be exactly the same.
By moving decision making for compatibility from user space to vendor
driver, user space software can be more change-resistant.
Agree?

Thanks
Yan

> 
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "cjia@nvidia.com" <cjia@nvidia.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"aik@ozlabs.ru" <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	"Zhengxiao.zx@alibaba-inc.com" <Zhengxiao.zx@alibaba-inc.com>,
	"shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com" <shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"kwankhede@nvidia.com" <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	"eauger@redhat.com" <eauger@redhat.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	"eskultet@redhat.com" <eskultet@redhat.com>,
	"Yang, Ziye" <ziye.yang@intel.com>,
	"mlevitsk@redhat.com" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	"pasic@linux.ibm.com" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	"libvir-list@redhat.com" <libvir-list@redhat.com>,
	"arei.gonglei@huawei.com" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	"felipe@nutanix.com" <felipe@nutanix.com>,
	"Ken.Xue@amd.com" <Ken.Xue@amd.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"dgilbert@redhat.com" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	"zhenyuw@linux.intel.com" <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Liu, Changpeng" <changpeng.liu@intel.com>,
	"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
	"jonathan.davies@nutanix.com" <jonathan.davies@nutanix.com>,
	"He, Shaopeng" <shaopeng.he@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vfio/mdev: add version field as mandatory attribute for mdev device
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:33:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424033346.GC26247@joy-OptiPlex-7040> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190424033346.fKRKE5-3TTwCzl1h8VZY0kVLolZmuVL9geCq4QqDKGE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423102419.GE6022@redhat.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8", Size: 4016 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 06:24:19PM +0800, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 01:41:57AM -0400, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 09:21:00AM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 21:01:52 -0400
> > > Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:39:50PM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 04:35:04 -0400
> > > > > Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > device version attribute in mdev sysfs is used by user space software
> > > > > > (e.g. libvirt) to query device compatibility for live migration of VFIO
> > > > > > mdev devices. This attribute is mandatory if a mdev device supports live
> > > > > > migration.
> > > > >
> > > > > The Subject: doesn't quite match what's being proposed here.
> > > > >
> > > > > > It consists of two parts: common part and vendor proprietary part.
> > > > > > common part: 32 bit. lower 16 bits is vendor id and higher 16 bits
> > > > > >              identifies device type. e.g., for pci device, it is
> > > > > >              "pci vendor id" | (VFIO_DEVICE_FLAGS_PCI << 16).
> > > > >
> > > > > What purpose does this serve?  If it's intended as some sort of
> > > > > namespace feature, shouldn't we first assume that we can only support
> > > > > migration to devices of the same type?  Therefore each type would
> > > > > already have its own namespace.  Also that would make the trailing bit
> > > > > of the version string listed below in the example redundant.  A vendor
> > > > > is still welcome to include this in their version string if they wish,
> > > > > but I think the string should be entirely vendor defined.
> > > > >
> > > > hi Alex,
> > > > This common part is a kind of namespace.
> > > > Because if version string is entirely defined by vendors, I'm worried about
> > > > if there is a case that one vendor's version string happens to deceive and
> > > > interfere with another vendor's version checking?
> > > > e.g.
> > > > vendor A has a version string like: vendor id + device id + mdev type
> > > > vendor B has a version string like: device id + vendor id + mdev type
> > > > but vendor A's vendor id is 0x8086, device id is 0x1217
> > > > vendor B's vendor id is 0x1217, device id is 0x8086.
> > > >
> > > > In this corner case, the two vendors may regard the two device is
> > > > migratable but actually they are not.
> > > >
> > > > That's the reason for this common part that serve as a kind of namespace
> > > > that all vendors will comply with to avoid overlap.
> > >
> > > If we assume that migration can only occur between matching mdev types,
> > > this is redundant, each type already has their own namespace.
> > >
> > hi Alex,
> > do you mean user space software like libvirt needs to first check whether
> > mdev type is matching and then check whether version is matching?
> 
> I would expect that libvirt (or other mgmt apps) will always first
> check that the vendor id, device id, mdev type all match. So for the
> version string it should suffice to be a "normal" numeric value.
> 
> Essentially version string just needs to be there to distinguish
> revisions of the same mdev type over time.
>
hi Daniel,
The way that user space software checks that the vendor id, device id, mdev
type all match and version string is just revisions is somewhat restrictive?
user space software could not have so much detailed information regarding to
which devices are compatible, especially when vendor id, device id,
revision id, and mdev types are not enough or no need to be exactly the same.
By moving decision making for compatibility from user space to vendor
driver, user space software can be more change-resistant.
Agree?

Thanks
Yan

> 
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-24  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-19  8:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] introduction of version attribute for VFIO live migration Yan Zhao
2019-04-19  8:32 ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-19  8:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] vfio/mdev: add version field as mandatory attribute for mdev device Yan Zhao
2019-04-19  8:35   ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-22 14:39   ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-22 14:39     ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23  1:01     ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-23  1:01       ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-23  1:21       ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23  1:21         ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23  5:41         ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-23  5:41           ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-23  9:45           ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-23  9:45             ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-23 10:24           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-23 10:24             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-24  3:33             ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2019-04-24  3:33               ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-23 15:02           ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 15:02             ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-24  3:39             ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-24  3:39               ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-24 14:14               ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-24 14:14                 ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-26  1:44                 ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-26  1:44                   ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-23  9:59   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-23  9:59     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-24  3:10     ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-24  3:10       ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-24  7:56       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-24  7:56         ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-24  8:15         ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-24  8:15           ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-30 15:29           ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-30 15:29             ` Cornelia Huck
2019-05-07  5:39             ` Yan Zhao
2019-05-07  8:51               ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-23 10:39   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-23 10:39     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-23 12:35     ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 12:35       ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 13:44       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-23 13:44         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-23 14:48         ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 14:48           ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-23 14:57           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-23 14:57             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-24  4:13     ` Neo Jia
2019-04-24  4:13       ` Neo Jia
2019-04-24  9:10     ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-04-24  9:10       ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-04-26  2:01       ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-26  2:01         ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-19  8:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gvt: export mdev device version to sysfs for Intel vGPU Yan Zhao
2019-04-19  8:35   ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-22  8:37   ` Zhenyu Wang
2019-04-22  8:37     ` Zhenyu Wang
2019-04-23  0:33     ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-23  0:33       ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-23 11:39   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-23 11:39     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-04-24  2:33     ` Yan Zhao
2019-04-24  2:33       ` Yan Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190424033346.GC26247@joy-OptiPlex-7040 \
    --to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=Ken.Xue@amd.com \
    --cc=Zhengxiao.zx@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eauger@redhat.com \
    --cc=eskultet@redhat.com \
    --cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathan.davies@nutanix.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shaopeng.he@intel.com \
    --cc=shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=ziye.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).