qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Shannon Zhao" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
	"Wei Yang" <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	"Ben Warren" <ben@skyportsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:22:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425072256.GA24344@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1556170489-131927-2-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:37AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>If RSDP revision is more than 0 fetch table pointed by XSDT
>and fallback to legacy RSDT table otherwise.
>
>While at it drop unused acpi_get_xsdt_address().

Would it be proper to split this into another patch?

>
>Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>---
>PS:
> it doesn't affect existing pc/q35 machines as they use RSDP.revision == 0
> but it will be used by followup patch to enable testing arm/virt
> board which uses provides XSDT table.
>---
> tests/acpi-utils.h       |  3 +--
> tests/acpi-utils.c       | 14 +-------------
> tests/bios-tables-test.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h
>index ef388bb..8c68201 100644
>--- a/tests/acpi-utils.h
>+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h
>@@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ typedef struct {
> 
> uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len);
> uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts);
>-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
>-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table);
>+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table);

Would you mind giving some hint of this change?

> void acpi_fetch_table(QTestState *qts, uint8_t **aml, uint32_t *aml_len,
>                       const uint8_t *addr_ptr, const char *sig,
>                       bool verify_checksum);
>diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c
>index cc33b46..9a6d1d3 100644
>--- a/tests/acpi-utils.c
>+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c
>@@ -51,19 +51,7 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts)
>     return off;
> }
> 
>-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
>-{
>-    uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;
>-    uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
>-
>-    /* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */
>-    g_assert(revision == 2);
>-
>-    memcpy(&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */], 8);
>-    return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address);
>-}
>-
>-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table)
>+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> {
>     uint8_t revision;
> 
>diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
>index a506dcb..24bd102 100644
>--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
>+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
>@@ -107,17 +107,25 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
>     }
> }
> 
>-static void test_acpi_rsdt_table(test_data *data)
>+static void test_acpi_rxsdt_table(test_data *data)
> {
>+    const char *sig = "RSDT";
>     AcpiSdtTable rsdt = {};
>+    int entry_size = 4;
>+    int addr_off = 16 /* RsdtAddress */;
>     uint8_t *ent;
> 
>-    /* read RSDT table */
>+    if (data->rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */] != 0) {
>+        addr_off = 24 /* XsdtAddress */;
>+        entry_size = 8;
>+        sig = "XSDT";
>+    }
>+    /* read [RX]SDT table */
>     acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &rsdt.aml, &rsdt.aml_len,
>-                     &data->rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress */], "RSDT", true);
>+                     &data->rsdp_table[addr_off], sig, true);
> 
>     /* Load all tables and add to test list directly RSDT referenced tables */
>-    ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, 4 /* Entry size */) {
>+    ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, entry_size) {
>         AcpiSdtTable ssdt_table = {};
> 
>         acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &ssdt_table.aml, &ssdt_table.aml_len, ent,
>@@ -521,7 +529,7 @@ static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data)
>     data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable));
>     test_acpi_rsdp_address(data);
>     test_acpi_rsdp_table(data);
>-    test_acpi_rsdt_table(data);
>+    test_acpi_rxsdt_table(data);
>     test_acpi_fadt_table(data);
> 
>     if (iasl) {
>-- 
>2.7.4

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Ben Warren" <ben@skyportsystems.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	"Shannon Zhao" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
	Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	"Wei Yang" <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:22:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425072256.GA24344@richard> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190425072256.bXN6bEuHquWeuxUWbrKhh4ejtdWQM1Gu7g4RJqb9TNI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1556170489-131927-2-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:37AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>If RSDP revision is more than 0 fetch table pointed by XSDT
>and fallback to legacy RSDT table otherwise.
>
>While at it drop unused acpi_get_xsdt_address().

Would it be proper to split this into another patch?

>
>Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>---
>PS:
> it doesn't affect existing pc/q35 machines as they use RSDP.revision == 0
> but it will be used by followup patch to enable testing arm/virt
> board which uses provides XSDT table.
>---
> tests/acpi-utils.h       |  3 +--
> tests/acpi-utils.c       | 14 +-------------
> tests/bios-tables-test.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h
>index ef388bb..8c68201 100644
>--- a/tests/acpi-utils.h
>+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h
>@@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ typedef struct {
> 
> uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len);
> uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts);
>-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
>-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table);
>+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table);

Would you mind giving some hint of this change?

> void acpi_fetch_table(QTestState *qts, uint8_t **aml, uint32_t *aml_len,
>                       const uint8_t *addr_ptr, const char *sig,
>                       bool verify_checksum);
>diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c
>index cc33b46..9a6d1d3 100644
>--- a/tests/acpi-utils.c
>+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c
>@@ -51,19 +51,7 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts)
>     return off;
> }
> 
>-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
>-{
>-    uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;
>-    uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
>-
>-    /* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */
>-    g_assert(revision == 2);
>-
>-    memcpy(&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */], 8);
>-    return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address);
>-}
>-
>-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table)
>+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> {
>     uint8_t revision;
> 
>diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
>index a506dcb..24bd102 100644
>--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
>+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
>@@ -107,17 +107,25 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
>     }
> }
> 
>-static void test_acpi_rsdt_table(test_data *data)
>+static void test_acpi_rxsdt_table(test_data *data)
> {
>+    const char *sig = "RSDT";
>     AcpiSdtTable rsdt = {};
>+    int entry_size = 4;
>+    int addr_off = 16 /* RsdtAddress */;
>     uint8_t *ent;
> 
>-    /* read RSDT table */
>+    if (data->rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */] != 0) {
>+        addr_off = 24 /* XsdtAddress */;
>+        entry_size = 8;
>+        sig = "XSDT";
>+    }
>+    /* read [RX]SDT table */
>     acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &rsdt.aml, &rsdt.aml_len,
>-                     &data->rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress */], "RSDT", true);
>+                     &data->rsdp_table[addr_off], sig, true);
> 
>     /* Load all tables and add to test list directly RSDT referenced tables */
>-    ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, 4 /* Entry size */) {
>+    ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, entry_size) {
>         AcpiSdtTable ssdt_table = {};
> 
>         acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &ssdt_table.aml, &ssdt_table.aml_len, ent,
>@@ -521,7 +529,7 @@ static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data)
>     data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable));
>     test_acpi_rsdp_address(data);
>     test_acpi_rsdp_table(data);
>-    test_acpi_rsdt_table(data);
>+    test_acpi_rxsdt_table(data);
>     test_acpi_fadt_table(data);
> 
>     if (iasl) {
>-- 
>2.7.4

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-25  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-25  5:34 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] tests: acpi: add UEFI (ARM) testing support Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:22   ` Wei Yang [this message]
2019-04-25  7:22     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:07     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:07       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:23       ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:23         ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/13] tests: acpi: rename acpi_parse_rsdp_table() into acpi_fetch_rsdp_table() Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:24   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:24     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] tests: acpi: make pointer to RSDP 64bit Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:31   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:31     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 10:38     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 10:38       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/13] tests: acpi: fetch X_DSDT if pointer to DSDT is 0 Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:44   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:44     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/13] tests: acpi: skip FACS table if board uses hw reduced ACPI profile Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:48   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:48     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/13] tests: acpi: move boot_sector_init() into x86 tests branch Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/13] tests: acpi: add acpi_find_rsdp_address_uefi() helper Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:00   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:00     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 10:56     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 10:56       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/13] tests: acpi: add a way to start tests with UEFI firmware Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:08   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:08     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:19     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:19       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/13] tests: acpi: ignore SMBIOS tests when UEFI firmware is used Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:37   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:37     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 13:28     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 13:28       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/13] tests: add expected ACPI tables for arm/virt board Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:40   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:40     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/13] tests: acpi: add simple arm/virt testcase Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:41   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:41     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 13:31     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 13:31       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 16:51   ` x00249684
2019-04-25 16:51     ` x00249684
2019-04-26 11:54     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-26 11:54       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-26 16:28       ` Wei Xu
2019-04-26 16:28         ` Wei Xu
2019-05-02 14:24         ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:24           ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:30           ` Wei Xu
2019-05-02 14:30             ` Wei Xu
2019-04-26 17:11   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-26 17:11     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-02 14:27     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:27       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:42       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-02 14:42         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/13] tests: acpi: refactor rebuild-expected-aml.sh to dump ACPI tables for a specified list of targets Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:20   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:20     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:32     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:32       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:46       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:46         ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/13] tests: acpi: print error unable to dump ACPI table during rebuild Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:22   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:22     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:26   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 11:26     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190425072256.GA24344@richard \
    --to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=ben@skyportsystems.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).