From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJZRa-0002an-DN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:09:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJZRY-0007os-Qb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:09:22 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:45788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJZRY-0007nH-Fy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:09:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:08:42 +0800 From: Wei Yang Message-ID: <20190425080842.GE24829@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <1556170489-131927-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1556170489-131927-9-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1556170489-131927-9-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/13] tests: acpi: add a way to start tests with UEFI firmware List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Igor Mammedov Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laszlo Ersek , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Gonglei , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Shannon Zhao , Wei Yang , Andrew Jones , Shameer Kolothum , Ben Warren On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:44AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: >For testcase to use UEFI firmware, one needs to provide and specify >firmwarei and varstore blobs names in test_data { uefi_fl1, uefi_fl2) } ^ a typo here? >fields respectively and RAM start address plus size where to look for >test structure signature. Additionally testcase should specify >bootable cdrom image uefi-boot-images EFI test utility. > >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov >Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek >--- >v3: > * drop data_dir prefix and firmware will come from pc-bios directly > * add cdrom option so test could use it for providing boot cdrom image > * add TODO comment convert '-drive if=pflash' to new syntax (Laszlo) >v2: > * move RAM start address and size to test_data, as it could differ > between boards (and even versions) >--- > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c >index 5790ee4..0f24540 100644 >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c >@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ > typedef struct { > const char *machine; > const char *variant; >+ const char *uefi_fl1; >+ const char *uefi_fl2; >+ const char *cd; >+ const uint64_t ram_start; >+ const uint64_t scan_len; > uint64_t rsdp_addr; > uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */]; > GArray *tables; >@@ -522,21 +527,40 @@ static void test_smbios_structs(test_data *data) > static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data) > { > char *args; >- >- /* Disable kernel irqchip to be able to override apic irq0. */ >- args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s,accel=%s,kernel-irqchip=off " >- "-net none -display none %s " >- "-drive id=hd0,if=none,file=%s,format=raw " >- "-device ide-hd,drive=hd0 ", >- data->machine, "kvm:tcg", >- params ? params : "", disk); >+ bool use_uefi = data->uefi_fl1 && data->uefi_fl2; >+ >+ if (use_uefi) { >+ /* >+ * TODO: convert '-drive if=pflash' to new syntax (see e33763be7cd3) >+ * when arm/virt boad starts to support it. >+ */ >+ args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s,accel=%s -nodefaults -nographic " >+ "-drive if=pflash,format=raw,file=%s,readonly " >+ "-drive if=pflash,format=raw,file=%s,snapshot=on -cdrom %s %s", >+ data->machine, "kvm:tcg", data->uefi_fl1, data->uefi_fl2, >+ data->cd, params ? params : ""); >+ >+ } else { >+ /* Disable kernel irqchip to be able to override apic irq0. */ >+ args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s,accel=%s,kernel-irqchip=off " >+ "-net none -display none %s " >+ "-drive id=hd0,if=none,file=%s,format=raw " >+ "-device ide-hd,drive=hd0 ", >+ data->machine, "kvm:tcg", params ? params : "", disk); >+ } > > data->qts = qtest_init(args); > >- boot_sector_test(data->qts); >+ if (use_uefi) { >+ g_assert(data->scan_len); >+ data->rsdp_addr = acpi_find_rsdp_address_uefi(data->qts, >+ data->ram_start, data->scan_len); Is this possible to merge this in test_acpi_rsdp_address()? Both of them set the data->rsdp_addr. >+ } else { >+ boot_sector_test(data->qts); >+ test_acpi_rsdp_address(data); >+ } > > data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable)); >- test_acpi_rsdp_address(data); > test_acpi_rsdp_table(data); > test_acpi_rxsdt_table(data); > test_acpi_fadt_table(data); >-- >2.7.4 -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E198C10F03 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32086217D7 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:10:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 32086217D7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53593 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJZT0-0003ND-A5 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:10:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJZRa-0002an-DN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:09:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJZRY-0007os-Qb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:09:22 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:45788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJZRY-0007nH-Fy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:09:20 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Apr 2019 01:09:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,393,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="164695777" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2019 01:09:09 -0700 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:08:42 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20190425080842.GE24829@richard> References: <1556170489-131927-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1556170489-131927-9-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1556170489-131927-9-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.55.52.93 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/13] tests: acpi: add a way to start tests with UEFI firmware X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Wei Yang Cc: Andrew Jones , Ben Warren , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Laszlo Ersek , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Shameer Kolothum , Shannon Zhao , Gonglei , Wei Yang , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Message-ID: <20190425080842.Amufc_O7vQwBvMCk09MAQ-MtcnBNdjgm8rxBsU16avg@z> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:44AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: >For testcase to use UEFI firmware, one needs to provide and specify >firmwarei and varstore blobs names in test_data { uefi_fl1, uefi_fl2) } ^ a typo here? >fields respectively and RAM start address plus size where to look for >test structure signature. Additionally testcase should specify >bootable cdrom image uefi-boot-images EFI test utility. > >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov >Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek >--- >v3: > * drop data_dir prefix and firmware will come from pc-bios directly > * add cdrom option so test could use it for providing boot cdrom image > * add TODO comment convert '-drive if=pflash' to new syntax (Laszlo) >v2: > * move RAM start address and size to test_data, as it could differ > between boards (and even versions) >--- > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c >index 5790ee4..0f24540 100644 >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c >@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ > typedef struct { > const char *machine; > const char *variant; >+ const char *uefi_fl1; >+ const char *uefi_fl2; >+ const char *cd; >+ const uint64_t ram_start; >+ const uint64_t scan_len; > uint64_t rsdp_addr; > uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */]; > GArray *tables; >@@ -522,21 +527,40 @@ static void test_smbios_structs(test_data *data) > static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data) > { > char *args; >- >- /* Disable kernel irqchip to be able to override apic irq0. */ >- args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s,accel=%s,kernel-irqchip=off " >- "-net none -display none %s " >- "-drive id=hd0,if=none,file=%s,format=raw " >- "-device ide-hd,drive=hd0 ", >- data->machine, "kvm:tcg", >- params ? params : "", disk); >+ bool use_uefi = data->uefi_fl1 && data->uefi_fl2; >+ >+ if (use_uefi) { >+ /* >+ * TODO: convert '-drive if=pflash' to new syntax (see e33763be7cd3) >+ * when arm/virt boad starts to support it. >+ */ >+ args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s,accel=%s -nodefaults -nographic " >+ "-drive if=pflash,format=raw,file=%s,readonly " >+ "-drive if=pflash,format=raw,file=%s,snapshot=on -cdrom %s %s", >+ data->machine, "kvm:tcg", data->uefi_fl1, data->uefi_fl2, >+ data->cd, params ? params : ""); >+ >+ } else { >+ /* Disable kernel irqchip to be able to override apic irq0. */ >+ args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s,accel=%s,kernel-irqchip=off " >+ "-net none -display none %s " >+ "-drive id=hd0,if=none,file=%s,format=raw " >+ "-device ide-hd,drive=hd0 ", >+ data->machine, "kvm:tcg", params ? params : "", disk); >+ } > > data->qts = qtest_init(args); > >- boot_sector_test(data->qts); >+ if (use_uefi) { >+ g_assert(data->scan_len); >+ data->rsdp_addr = acpi_find_rsdp_address_uefi(data->qts, >+ data->ram_start, data->scan_len); Is this possible to merge this in test_acpi_rsdp_address()? Both of them set the data->rsdp_addr. >+ } else { >+ boot_sector_test(data->qts); >+ test_acpi_rsdp_address(data); >+ } > > data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable)); >- test_acpi_rsdp_address(data); > test_acpi_rsdp_table(data); > test_acpi_rxsdt_table(data); > test_acpi_fadt_table(data); >-- >2.7.4 -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me