From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Cc: "Wei Yang" <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>, "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>, "Ben Warren" <ben@skyportsystems.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>, "Shannon Zhao" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>, Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:23:31 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190425082331.GH24829@richard> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190425100751.11ac20bf@redhat.com> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:07:51AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: >On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:22:56 +0800 >Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:37AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: >> >If RSDP revision is more than 0 fetch table pointed by XSDT >> >and fallback to legacy RSDT table otherwise. >> > >> >While at it drop unused acpi_get_xsdt_address(). >> >> Would it be proper to split this into another patch? > >it should be fine to remove code that's being replaced by new one >which substitutes the former within the same patch. >but if you insist I can split it into another patch. I am fine with this included. > >> > >> >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> >> >--- >> >PS: >> > it doesn't affect existing pc/q35 machines as they use RSDP.revision == 0 >> > but it will be used by followup patch to enable testing arm/virt >> > board which uses provides XSDT table. >> >--- >> > tests/acpi-utils.h | 3 +-- >> > tests/acpi-utils.c | 14 +------------- >> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- >> > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> > >> >diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h >> >index ef388bb..8c68201 100644 >> >--- a/tests/acpi-utils.h >> >+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h >> >@@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ typedef struct { >> > >> > uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len); >> > uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts); >> >-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table); >> >-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table); >> >+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table); >> >> Would you mind giving some hint of this change? >thanks for spotting it. IT certainly doesn't belong to this patch. >I'll need to recheck if supporting 64bit address fields is done properly >and find another place where to move this hunk. > >> >> > void acpi_fetch_table(QTestState *qts, uint8_t **aml, uint32_t *aml_len, >> > const uint8_t *addr_ptr, const char *sig, >> > bool verify_checksum); >> >diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c >> >index cc33b46..9a6d1d3 100644 >> >--- a/tests/acpi-utils.c >> >+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c >> >@@ -51,19 +51,7 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts) >> > return off; >> > } >> > >> >-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table) >> >-{ >> >- uint64_t xsdt_physical_address; >> >- uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */]; >> >- >> >- /* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */ >> >- g_assert(revision == 2); >> >- >> >- memcpy(&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */], 8); >> >- return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address); >> >-} >> >- >> >-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table) >> >+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table) >> > { >> > uint8_t revision; >> > >> >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c >> >index a506dcb..24bd102 100644 >> >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c >> >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c >> >@@ -107,17 +107,25 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data) >> > } >> > } >> > >> >-static void test_acpi_rsdt_table(test_data *data) >> >+static void test_acpi_rxsdt_table(test_data *data) >> > { >> >+ const char *sig = "RSDT"; >> > AcpiSdtTable rsdt = {}; >> >+ int entry_size = 4; >> >+ int addr_off = 16 /* RsdtAddress */; >> > uint8_t *ent; >> > >> >- /* read RSDT table */ >> >+ if (data->rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */] != 0) { >> >+ addr_off = 24 /* XsdtAddress */; >> >+ entry_size = 8; >> >+ sig = "XSDT"; >> >+ } >> >+ /* read [RX]SDT table */ >> > acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &rsdt.aml, &rsdt.aml_len, >> >- &data->rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress */], "RSDT", true); >> >+ &data->rsdp_table[addr_off], sig, true); >> > >> > /* Load all tables and add to test list directly RSDT referenced tables */ >> >- ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, 4 /* Entry size */) { >> >+ ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, entry_size) { >> > AcpiSdtTable ssdt_table = {}; >> > >> > acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &ssdt_table.aml, &ssdt_table.aml_len, ent, >> >@@ -521,7 +529,7 @@ static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data) >> > data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable)); >> > test_acpi_rsdp_address(data); >> > test_acpi_rsdp_table(data); >> >- test_acpi_rsdt_table(data); >> >+ test_acpi_rxsdt_table(data); >> > test_acpi_fadt_table(data); >> > >> > if (iasl) { >> >-- >> >2.7.4 >> -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>, "Ben Warren" <ben@skyportsystems.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>, "Shannon Zhao" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>, Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>, "Wei Yang" <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>, "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:23:31 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20190425082331.GH24829@richard> (raw) Message-ID: <20190425082331.KtrRP6138MLX263xzFfHou6e8D_sj14VntwK0MOiD8I@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190425100751.11ac20bf@redhat.com> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:07:51AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: >On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:22:56 +0800 >Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:37AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: >> >If RSDP revision is more than 0 fetch table pointed by XSDT >> >and fallback to legacy RSDT table otherwise. >> > >> >While at it drop unused acpi_get_xsdt_address(). >> >> Would it be proper to split this into another patch? > >it should be fine to remove code that's being replaced by new one >which substitutes the former within the same patch. >but if you insist I can split it into another patch. I am fine with this included. > >> > >> >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> >> >--- >> >PS: >> > it doesn't affect existing pc/q35 machines as they use RSDP.revision == 0 >> > but it will be used by followup patch to enable testing arm/virt >> > board which uses provides XSDT table. >> >--- >> > tests/acpi-utils.h | 3 +-- >> > tests/acpi-utils.c | 14 +------------- >> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- >> > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> > >> >diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h >> >index ef388bb..8c68201 100644 >> >--- a/tests/acpi-utils.h >> >+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h >> >@@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ typedef struct { >> > >> > uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len); >> > uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts); >> >-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table); >> >-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table); >> >+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table); >> >> Would you mind giving some hint of this change? >thanks for spotting it. IT certainly doesn't belong to this patch. >I'll need to recheck if supporting 64bit address fields is done properly >and find another place where to move this hunk. > >> >> > void acpi_fetch_table(QTestState *qts, uint8_t **aml, uint32_t *aml_len, >> > const uint8_t *addr_ptr, const char *sig, >> > bool verify_checksum); >> >diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c >> >index cc33b46..9a6d1d3 100644 >> >--- a/tests/acpi-utils.c >> >+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c >> >@@ -51,19 +51,7 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts) >> > return off; >> > } >> > >> >-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table) >> >-{ >> >- uint64_t xsdt_physical_address; >> >- uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */]; >> >- >> >- /* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */ >> >- g_assert(revision == 2); >> >- >> >- memcpy(&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */], 8); >> >- return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address); >> >-} >> >- >> >-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table) >> >+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table) >> > { >> > uint8_t revision; >> > >> >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c >> >index a506dcb..24bd102 100644 >> >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c >> >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c >> >@@ -107,17 +107,25 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data) >> > } >> > } >> > >> >-static void test_acpi_rsdt_table(test_data *data) >> >+static void test_acpi_rxsdt_table(test_data *data) >> > { >> >+ const char *sig = "RSDT"; >> > AcpiSdtTable rsdt = {}; >> >+ int entry_size = 4; >> >+ int addr_off = 16 /* RsdtAddress */; >> > uint8_t *ent; >> > >> >- /* read RSDT table */ >> >+ if (data->rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */] != 0) { >> >+ addr_off = 24 /* XsdtAddress */; >> >+ entry_size = 8; >> >+ sig = "XSDT"; >> >+ } >> >+ /* read [RX]SDT table */ >> > acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &rsdt.aml, &rsdt.aml_len, >> >- &data->rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress */], "RSDT", true); >> >+ &data->rsdp_table[addr_off], sig, true); >> > >> > /* Load all tables and add to test list directly RSDT referenced tables */ >> >- ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, 4 /* Entry size */) { >> >+ ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, entry_size) { >> > AcpiSdtTable ssdt_table = {}; >> > >> > acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &ssdt_table.aml, &ssdt_table.aml_len, ent, >> >@@ -521,7 +529,7 @@ static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data) >> > data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable)); >> > test_acpi_rsdp_address(data); >> > test_acpi_rsdp_table(data); >> >- test_acpi_rsdt_table(data); >> >+ test_acpi_rxsdt_table(data); >> > test_acpi_fadt_table(data); >> > >> > if (iasl) { >> >-- >> >2.7.4 >> -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-25 8:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-25 5:34 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] tests: acpi: add UEFI (ARM) testing support Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 7:22 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 7:22 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 8:07 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 8:07 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 8:23 ` Wei Yang [this message] 2019-04-25 8:23 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/13] tests: acpi: rename acpi_parse_rsdp_table() into acpi_fetch_rsdp_table() Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 7:24 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 7:24 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] tests: acpi: make pointer to RSDP 64bit Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 7:31 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 7:31 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 10:38 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 10:38 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/13] tests: acpi: fetch X_DSDT if pointer to DSDT is 0 Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 7:44 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 7:44 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/13] tests: acpi: skip FACS table if board uses hw reduced ACPI profile Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 7:48 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 7:48 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/13] tests: acpi: move boot_sector_init() into x86 tests branch Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/13] tests: acpi: add acpi_find_rsdp_address_uefi() helper Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 8:00 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 8:00 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 10:56 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 10:56 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/13] tests: acpi: add a way to start tests with UEFI firmware Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 8:08 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 8:08 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 11:19 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 11:19 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/13] tests: acpi: ignore SMBIOS tests when UEFI firmware is used Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 12:37 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2019-04-25 12:37 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2019-04-25 13:28 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 13:28 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/13] tests: add expected ACPI tables for arm/virt board Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 12:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2019-04-25 12:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/13] tests: acpi: add simple arm/virt testcase Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 12:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2019-04-25 12:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2019-04-25 13:31 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 13:31 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 16:51 ` x00249684 2019-04-25 16:51 ` x00249684 2019-04-26 11:54 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-26 11:54 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-26 16:28 ` Wei Xu 2019-04-26 16:28 ` Wei Xu 2019-05-02 14:24 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-05-02 14:24 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-05-02 14:30 ` Wei Xu 2019-05-02 14:30 ` Wei Xu 2019-04-26 17:11 ` Laszlo Ersek 2019-04-26 17:11 ` Laszlo Ersek 2019-05-02 14:27 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-05-02 14:27 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-05-02 14:42 ` Laszlo Ersek 2019-05-02 14:42 ` Laszlo Ersek 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/13] tests: acpi: refactor rebuild-expected-aml.sh to dump ACPI tables for a specified list of targets Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 8:20 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 8:20 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 11:32 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 11:32 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 11:46 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 11:46 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/13] tests: acpi: print error unable to dump ACPI table during rebuild Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 5:34 ` Igor Mammedov 2019-04-25 8:22 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 8:22 ` Wei Yang 2019-04-25 11:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 2019-04-25 11:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20190425082331.GH24829@richard \ --to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \ --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \ --cc=ben@skyportsystems.com \ --cc=drjones@redhat.com \ --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \ --cc=lersek@redhat.com \ --cc=mst@redhat.com \ --cc=philmd@redhat.com \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \ --cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).