qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Ben Warren" <ben@skyportsystems.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	"Shannon Zhao" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
	Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:07:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425100751.11ac20bf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425072256.GA24344@richard>

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:22:56 +0800
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:37AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >If RSDP revision is more than 0 fetch table pointed by XSDT
> >and fallback to legacy RSDT table otherwise.
> >
> >While at it drop unused acpi_get_xsdt_address().  
> 
> Would it be proper to split this into another patch?

it should be fine to remove code that's being replaced by new one
which substitutes the former within the same patch.
but if you insist I can split it into another patch.

> >
> >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> >---
> >PS:
> > it doesn't affect existing pc/q35 machines as they use RSDP.revision == 0
> > but it will be used by followup patch to enable testing arm/virt
> > board which uses provides XSDT table.
> >---
> > tests/acpi-utils.h       |  3 +--
> > tests/acpi-utils.c       | 14 +-------------
> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h
> >index ef388bb..8c68201 100644
> >--- a/tests/acpi-utils.h
> >+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h
> >@@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ typedef struct {
> > 
> > uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len);
> > uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts);
> >-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> >-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> >+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table);  
> 
> Would you mind giving some hint of this change?
thanks for spotting it. IT certainly doesn't belong to this patch.
I'll need to recheck if supporting 64bit address fields is done properly
and find another place where to move this hunk.

> 
> > void acpi_fetch_table(QTestState *qts, uint8_t **aml, uint32_t *aml_len,
> >                       const uint8_t *addr_ptr, const char *sig,
> >                       bool verify_checksum);
> >diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c
> >index cc33b46..9a6d1d3 100644
> >--- a/tests/acpi-utils.c
> >+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c
> >@@ -51,19 +51,7 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts)
> >     return off;
> > }
> > 
> >-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> >-{
> >-    uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;
> >-    uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> >-
> >-    /* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */
> >-    g_assert(revision == 2);
> >-
> >-    memcpy(&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */], 8);
> >-    return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address);
> >-}
> >-
> >-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> >+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> > {
> >     uint8_t revision;
> > 
> >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >index a506dcb..24bd102 100644
> >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >@@ -107,17 +107,25 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
> >     }
> > }
> > 
> >-static void test_acpi_rsdt_table(test_data *data)
> >+static void test_acpi_rxsdt_table(test_data *data)
> > {
> >+    const char *sig = "RSDT";
> >     AcpiSdtTable rsdt = {};
> >+    int entry_size = 4;
> >+    int addr_off = 16 /* RsdtAddress */;
> >     uint8_t *ent;
> > 
> >-    /* read RSDT table */
> >+    if (data->rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */] != 0) {
> >+        addr_off = 24 /* XsdtAddress */;
> >+        entry_size = 8;
> >+        sig = "XSDT";
> >+    }
> >+    /* read [RX]SDT table */
> >     acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &rsdt.aml, &rsdt.aml_len,
> >-                     &data->rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress */], "RSDT", true);
> >+                     &data->rsdp_table[addr_off], sig, true);
> > 
> >     /* Load all tables and add to test list directly RSDT referenced tables */
> >-    ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, 4 /* Entry size */) {
> >+    ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, entry_size) {
> >         AcpiSdtTable ssdt_table = {};
> > 
> >         acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &ssdt_table.aml, &ssdt_table.aml_len, ent,
> >@@ -521,7 +529,7 @@ static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data)
> >     data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable));
> >     test_acpi_rsdp_address(data);
> >     test_acpi_rsdp_table(data);
> >-    test_acpi_rsdt_table(data);
> >+    test_acpi_rxsdt_table(data);
> >     test_acpi_fadt_table(data);
> > 
> >     if (iasl) {
> >-- 
> >2.7.4  
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Ben Warren" <ben@skyportsystems.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	"Shannon Zhao" <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
	Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:07:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425100751.11ac20bf@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190425080751.7hvDtT38cn6UE_y4cZ0HF5_3h1vzZ8I93fWLEuiG5gA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425072256.GA24344@richard>

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:22:56 +0800
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:37AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >If RSDP revision is more than 0 fetch table pointed by XSDT
> >and fallback to legacy RSDT table otherwise.
> >
> >While at it drop unused acpi_get_xsdt_address().  
> 
> Would it be proper to split this into another patch?

it should be fine to remove code that's being replaced by new one
which substitutes the former within the same patch.
but if you insist I can split it into another patch.

> >
> >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> >---
> >PS:
> > it doesn't affect existing pc/q35 machines as they use RSDP.revision == 0
> > but it will be used by followup patch to enable testing arm/virt
> > board which uses provides XSDT table.
> >---
> > tests/acpi-utils.h       |  3 +--
> > tests/acpi-utils.c       | 14 +-------------
> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.h b/tests/acpi-utils.h
> >index ef388bb..8c68201 100644
> >--- a/tests/acpi-utils.h
> >+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.h
> >@@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ typedef struct {
> > 
> > uint8_t acpi_calc_checksum(const uint8_t *data, int len);
> > uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts);
> >-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> >-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table);
> >+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table);  
> 
> Would you mind giving some hint of this change?
thanks for spotting it. IT certainly doesn't belong to this patch.
I'll need to recheck if supporting 64bit address fields is done properly
and find another place where to move this hunk.

> 
> > void acpi_fetch_table(QTestState *qts, uint8_t **aml, uint32_t *aml_len,
> >                       const uint8_t *addr_ptr, const char *sig,
> >                       bool verify_checksum);
> >diff --git a/tests/acpi-utils.c b/tests/acpi-utils.c
> >index cc33b46..9a6d1d3 100644
> >--- a/tests/acpi-utils.c
> >+++ b/tests/acpi-utils.c
> >@@ -51,19 +51,7 @@ uint32_t acpi_find_rsdp_address(QTestState *qts)
> >     return off;
> > }
> > 
> >-uint64_t acpi_get_xsdt_address(uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> >-{
> >-    uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;
> >-    uint8_t revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> >-
> >-    /* We must have revision 2 if we're looking for an XSDT pointer */
> >-    g_assert(revision == 2);
> >-
> >-    memcpy(&xsdt_physical_address, &rsdp_table[24 /* XsdtAddress offset */], 8);
> >-    return le64_to_cpu(xsdt_physical_address);
> >-}
> >-
> >-void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint32_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> >+void acpi_parse_rsdp_table(QTestState *qts, uint64_t addr, uint8_t *rsdp_table)
> > {
> >     uint8_t revision;
> > 
> >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >index a506dcb..24bd102 100644
> >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >@@ -107,17 +107,25 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
> >     }
> > }
> > 
> >-static void test_acpi_rsdt_table(test_data *data)
> >+static void test_acpi_rxsdt_table(test_data *data)
> > {
> >+    const char *sig = "RSDT";
> >     AcpiSdtTable rsdt = {};
> >+    int entry_size = 4;
> >+    int addr_off = 16 /* RsdtAddress */;
> >     uint8_t *ent;
> > 
> >-    /* read RSDT table */
> >+    if (data->rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */] != 0) {
> >+        addr_off = 24 /* XsdtAddress */;
> >+        entry_size = 8;
> >+        sig = "XSDT";
> >+    }
> >+    /* read [RX]SDT table */
> >     acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &rsdt.aml, &rsdt.aml_len,
> >-                     &data->rsdp_table[16 /* RsdtAddress */], "RSDT", true);
> >+                     &data->rsdp_table[addr_off], sig, true);
> > 
> >     /* Load all tables and add to test list directly RSDT referenced tables */
> >-    ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, 4 /* Entry size */) {
> >+    ACPI_FOREACH_RSDT_ENTRY(rsdt.aml, rsdt.aml_len, ent, entry_size) {
> >         AcpiSdtTable ssdt_table = {};
> > 
> >         acpi_fetch_table(data->qts, &ssdt_table.aml, &ssdt_table.aml_len, ent,
> >@@ -521,7 +529,7 @@ static void test_acpi_one(const char *params, test_data *data)
> >     data->tables = g_array_new(false, true, sizeof(AcpiSdtTable));
> >     test_acpi_rsdp_address(data);
> >     test_acpi_rsdp_table(data);
> >-    test_acpi_rsdt_table(data);
> >+    test_acpi_rxsdt_table(data);
> >     test_acpi_fadt_table(data);
> > 
> >     if (iasl) {
> >-- 
> >2.7.4  
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-25  8:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-25  5:34 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] tests: acpi: add UEFI (ARM) testing support Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:22   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:22     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:07     ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2019-04-25  8:07       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:23       ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:23         ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/13] tests: acpi: rename acpi_parse_rsdp_table() into acpi_fetch_rsdp_table() Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:24   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:24     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] tests: acpi: make pointer to RSDP 64bit Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:31   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:31     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 10:38     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 10:38       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/13] tests: acpi: fetch X_DSDT if pointer to DSDT is 0 Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:44   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:44     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/13] tests: acpi: skip FACS table if board uses hw reduced ACPI profile Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:48   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:48     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/13] tests: acpi: move boot_sector_init() into x86 tests branch Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/13] tests: acpi: add acpi_find_rsdp_address_uefi() helper Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:00   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:00     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 10:56     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 10:56       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/13] tests: acpi: add a way to start tests with UEFI firmware Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:08   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:08     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:19     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:19       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/13] tests: acpi: ignore SMBIOS tests when UEFI firmware is used Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:37   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:37     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 13:28     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 13:28       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/13] tests: add expected ACPI tables for arm/virt board Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:40   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:40     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/13] tests: acpi: add simple arm/virt testcase Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:41   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:41     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 13:31     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 13:31       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 16:51   ` x00249684
2019-04-25 16:51     ` x00249684
2019-04-26 11:54     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-26 11:54       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-26 16:28       ` Wei Xu
2019-04-26 16:28         ` Wei Xu
2019-05-02 14:24         ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:24           ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:30           ` Wei Xu
2019-05-02 14:30             ` Wei Xu
2019-04-26 17:11   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-26 17:11     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-02 14:27     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:27       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:42       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-02 14:42         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/13] tests: acpi: refactor rebuild-expected-aml.sh to dump ACPI tables for a specified list of targets Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:20   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:20     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:32     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:32       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:46       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:46         ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/13] tests: acpi: print error unable to dump ACPI table during rebuild Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:22   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:22     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:26   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 11:26     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190425100751.11ac20bf@redhat.com \
    --to=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=ben@skyportsystems.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).