qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Cc: x00249684 <xuwei5@huawei.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/13] tests: acpi: add simple arm/virt testcase
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 16:24:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502162420.6c8280c8@Igors-MacBook-Pro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b87a2b31-0389-2df0-42a6-a1593d437fcd@hisilicon.com>

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:28:10 +0100
Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> wrote:

> Hi Igor,
> 
> On 4/26/2019 12:54 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:51:56 +0800
> > x00249684 <xuwei5@huawei.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Igor,
> >>
> >> +static void test_acpi_virt_tcg(void)
> >> +{
> >> +    test_data data = {
> >> +        .machine = "virt",
> >> +        .uefi_fl1 = "pc-bios/edk2-aarch64-code.fd",
> >> +        .uefi_fl2 = "pc-bios/edk2-arm-vars.fd",
> >> +        .cd = "tests/data/uefi-boot-images/bios-tables-test.aarch64.iso.qcow2",
> >> +        .ram_start = 0x40000000ULL,
> >> +        .scan_len = 128ULL * 1024 * 1024,
> >> +    };
> >> +
> >> +    test_acpi_one("-cpu cortex-a57 ", &data);
> >>
> >> Replaced the cortex-a57 with host and succesfully tested on the hisilicon arm64 
> >> D05 board. Otherwise it failed with "kvm_init_vcpu failed: Invalid argument".
> >> Is it possilbe to set the cpu type like numa-test.c?
> > 
> > I think it works with numa-test because it uses TCG only but in case of bios-tables-test
> > it uses accel="kvm:tcg" to leverage KVM capabilities whenever possible to speed up test.
> > 
> > Now back to our ARM test case, uefi requirement is to use 64bit CPU (hence it was cortex-a57)
> > however unlike x86 it obviously breaks since KVM accelerator on ARM host is used
> > and it doesn't work with anything other than 'host' cpu model.
> > 
> > I think we still want to use KVM whenever possible, but problem lies in that
> > user (testcase) doesn't have an idea if KVM accelerator is available and host is 64 CPU.
> > 
> > to sum up we need to support 2 modes:
> >   1. host is 64 ARM, use kvm with -cpu host
> >   2. all other cases use tcg with -cpu cortex-a57
> > 
> > I can hack to probe if /dev/kvm is accessible and host is 64 bit and use #1
> > otherwise fallback to #2
> > or as quick fix do only #2 initially and think about a better solution to #1 
> 
> Thanks!
> Fine to me.
> 
> > 
> > Is there any other suggestions/opinions how to approach issue/proceed.
> 
> To check the host cpu architecture is ARM or not, maybe we can check the value
> of "CPU implementer" is 0x41 or not from the /proc/cpuinfo.

it turned out it's more complicated.
we also should pick a correct GIC depending on host's CPU and that
changes ACPI tables, so it will worn on some hosts and fail on other.

I'll add a patch to enable test case to pick accelerator and force TCG
for ARM tests for now.

> 
> Best Regards,
> Wei
> 
> > 
> > PS:
> > we probably would like to reuse this not only for acpi tests but also for other
> > arm/virt test cases that involve running guest code. 
> > 
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Wei
> > 
> > 
> > .
> > 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	mst@redhat.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	x00249684 <xuwei5@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/13] tests: acpi: add simple arm/virt testcase
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 16:24:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502162420.6c8280c8@Igors-MacBook-Pro> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190502142420.pXFK3gQ_6qkAWpuNWnOQ1XPm7KUAYYZRWdy5PJCi05A@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b87a2b31-0389-2df0-42a6-a1593d437fcd@hisilicon.com>

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:28:10 +0100
Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com> wrote:

> Hi Igor,
> 
> On 4/26/2019 12:54 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:51:56 +0800
> > x00249684 <xuwei5@huawei.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Igor,
> >>
> >> +static void test_acpi_virt_tcg(void)
> >> +{
> >> +    test_data data = {
> >> +        .machine = "virt",
> >> +        .uefi_fl1 = "pc-bios/edk2-aarch64-code.fd",
> >> +        .uefi_fl2 = "pc-bios/edk2-arm-vars.fd",
> >> +        .cd = "tests/data/uefi-boot-images/bios-tables-test.aarch64.iso.qcow2",
> >> +        .ram_start = 0x40000000ULL,
> >> +        .scan_len = 128ULL * 1024 * 1024,
> >> +    };
> >> +
> >> +    test_acpi_one("-cpu cortex-a57 ", &data);
> >>
> >> Replaced the cortex-a57 with host and succesfully tested on the hisilicon arm64 
> >> D05 board. Otherwise it failed with "kvm_init_vcpu failed: Invalid argument".
> >> Is it possilbe to set the cpu type like numa-test.c?
> > 
> > I think it works with numa-test because it uses TCG only but in case of bios-tables-test
> > it uses accel="kvm:tcg" to leverage KVM capabilities whenever possible to speed up test.
> > 
> > Now back to our ARM test case, uefi requirement is to use 64bit CPU (hence it was cortex-a57)
> > however unlike x86 it obviously breaks since KVM accelerator on ARM host is used
> > and it doesn't work with anything other than 'host' cpu model.
> > 
> > I think we still want to use KVM whenever possible, but problem lies in that
> > user (testcase) doesn't have an idea if KVM accelerator is available and host is 64 CPU.
> > 
> > to sum up we need to support 2 modes:
> >   1. host is 64 ARM, use kvm with -cpu host
> >   2. all other cases use tcg with -cpu cortex-a57
> > 
> > I can hack to probe if /dev/kvm is accessible and host is 64 bit and use #1
> > otherwise fallback to #2
> > or as quick fix do only #2 initially and think about a better solution to #1 
> 
> Thanks!
> Fine to me.
> 
> > 
> > Is there any other suggestions/opinions how to approach issue/proceed.
> 
> To check the host cpu architecture is ARM or not, maybe we can check the value
> of "CPU implementer" is 0x41 or not from the /proc/cpuinfo.

it turned out it's more complicated.
we also should pick a correct GIC depending on host's CPU and that
changes ACPI tables, so it will worn on some hosts and fail on other.

I'll add a patch to enable test case to pick accelerator and force TCG
for ARM tests for now.

> 
> Best Regards,
> Wei
> 
> > 
> > PS:
> > we probably would like to reuse this not only for acpi tests but also for other
> > arm/virt test cases that involve running guest code. 
> > 
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Wei
> > 
> > 
> > .
> > 
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-02 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-25  5:34 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] tests: acpi: add UEFI (ARM) testing support Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/13] tests: acpi: make RSDT test routine handle XSDT Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:22   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:22     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:07     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:07       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:23       ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:23         ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/13] tests: acpi: rename acpi_parse_rsdp_table() into acpi_fetch_rsdp_table() Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:24   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:24     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] tests: acpi: make pointer to RSDP 64bit Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:31   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:31     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 10:38     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 10:38       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/13] tests: acpi: fetch X_DSDT if pointer to DSDT is 0 Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:44   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:44     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/13] tests: acpi: skip FACS table if board uses hw reduced ACPI profile Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  7:48   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  7:48     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/13] tests: acpi: move boot_sector_init() into x86 tests branch Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/13] tests: acpi: add acpi_find_rsdp_address_uefi() helper Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:00   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:00     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 10:56     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 10:56       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/13] tests: acpi: add a way to start tests with UEFI firmware Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:08   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:08     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:19     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:19       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/13] tests: acpi: ignore SMBIOS tests when UEFI firmware is used Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:37   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:37     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 13:28     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 13:28       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/13] tests: add expected ACPI tables for arm/virt board Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:40   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:40     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/13] tests: acpi: add simple arm/virt testcase Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 12:41   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 12:41     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 13:31     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 13:31       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 16:51   ` x00249684
2019-04-25 16:51     ` x00249684
2019-04-26 11:54     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-26 11:54       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-26 16:28       ` Wei Xu
2019-04-26 16:28         ` Wei Xu
2019-05-02 14:24         ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2019-05-02 14:24           ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:30           ` Wei Xu
2019-05-02 14:30             ` Wei Xu
2019-04-26 17:11   ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-26 17:11     ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-02 14:27     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:27       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-05-02 14:42       ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-02 14:42         ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/13] tests: acpi: refactor rebuild-expected-aml.sh to dump ACPI tables for a specified list of targets Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:20   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:20     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:32     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:32       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:46       ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25 11:46         ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/13] tests: acpi: print error unable to dump ACPI table during rebuild Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  5:34   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-04-25  8:22   ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25  8:22     ` Wei Yang
2019-04-25 11:26   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-25 11:26     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190502162420.6c8280c8@Igors-MacBook-Pro \
    --to=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).