From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNPvI-0004io-F6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:47:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNPvH-0002U6-Ja for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:47:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNPvH-0002T0-DM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:47:55 -0400 From: =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 00:47:36 +0200 Message-Id: <20190505224737.1028-1-philmd@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] MAINTAINERS: Step in as maintainer for the parallel NOR flash devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Petazzoni , Michael Walle , Jordan Justen , Peter Maydell , "Edgar E . Iglesias" , Paul Burton , Roy Franz , Stephen Checkoway , Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Engraf , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Stefan Weil Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Laszlo Ersek , Thomas Huth , =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= , Markus Armbruster , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= The parallel NOR flash models don't have a specific maintainer and default to the 'Block layer core' section. Step in to maintain them. The section still get covered by the Block layer team, but the idea is to offload them. The two devices are very similar (same technology), the difference is mostly the protocol to access them. Amusingly, between the two devices, the 'CFI01' which is used in enterprise grade products on ARM/X86 archs is the one that received the less care, while the 'CFI02' used by hobbyist boards is the more reliable. To some extent I plan to re-unify the models, and improve testing. I'm looking for co-maintainers or designated reviewers. (I asked Stephen Checkoway for help but unfortunately he can't). Any volunteer? Regards, Phil. PD: I Cc'ed all the people who made sinificant modification in the devices the last few years. Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 (1): MAINTAINERS: Add an entry for the Parallel NOR Flash devices MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) --=20 2.20.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF013C004C9 for ; Sun, 5 May 2019 22:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB873206DF for ; Sun, 5 May 2019 22:48:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BB873206DF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47290 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNPw2-000523-Qc for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:48:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNPvI-0004io-F6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:47:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNPvH-0002U6-Ja for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:47:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNPvH-0002T0-DM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2019 18:47:55 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C49030820E4; Sun, 5 May 2019 22:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1w.redhat.com (ovpn-204-58.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.58]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D09C71F2; Sun, 5 May 2019 22:47:40 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= To: Thomas Petazzoni , Michael Walle , Jordan Justen , Peter Maydell , "Edgar E . Iglesias" , Paul Burton , Roy Franz , Stephen Checkoway , Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Engraf , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Stefan Weil Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 00:47:36 +0200 Message-Id: <20190505224737.1028-1-philmd@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.47]); Sun, 05 May 2019 22:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] MAINTAINERS: Step in as maintainer for the parallel NOR flash devices X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Laszlo Ersek , Markus Armbruster , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Message-ID: <20190505224736.8YN8gAKAUNKoYpWL8kXfiQIcO-CjhWiL-o4_0ywVqGU@z> The parallel NOR flash models don't have a specific maintainer and default to the 'Block layer core' section. Step in to maintain them. The section still get covered by the Block layer team, but the idea is to offload them. The two devices are very similar (same technology), the difference is mostly the protocol to access them. Amusingly, between the two devices, the 'CFI01' which is used in enterprise grade products on ARM/X86 archs is the one that received the less care, while the 'CFI02' used by hobbyist boards is the more reliable. To some extent I plan to re-unify the models, and improve testing. I'm looking for co-maintainers or designated reviewers. (I asked Stephen Checkoway for help but unfortunately he can't). Any volunteer? Regards, Phil. PD: I Cc'ed all the people who made sinificant modification in the devices the last few years. Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 (1): MAINTAINERS: Add an entry for the Parallel NOR Flash devices MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) --=20 2.20.1