From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/7] block: Fix order in bdrv_replace_child()
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 20:25:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190508182546.2239-6-mreitz@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190508182546.2239-1-mreitz@redhat.com>
We have to start by applying the permission restrictions to new_bs
before we can loosen them on old_bs. See the comment for the
explanation.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
block.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index be11504940..da7da8cc6c 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -2205,6 +2205,19 @@ static void bdrv_replace_child(BdrvChild *child, BlockDriverState *new_bs)
bdrv_replace_child_noperm(child, new_bs);
+ /*
+ * Start with the new node's permissions. If @new_bs is a (direct
+ * or indirect) child of @old_bs, we must complete the permission
+ * update on @new_bs before we loosen the restrictions on @old_bs.
+ * Otherwise, bdrv_check_perm() on @old_bs would re-initiate
+ * updating the permissions of @new_bs, and thus not purely loosen
+ * restrictions.
+ */
+ if (new_bs) {
+ bdrv_get_cumulative_perm(new_bs, &perm, &shared_perm);
+ bdrv_set_perm(new_bs, perm, shared_perm);
+ }
+
if (old_bs) {
/* Update permissions for old node. This is guaranteed to succeed
* because we're just taking a parent away, so we're loosening
@@ -2213,11 +2226,6 @@ static void bdrv_replace_child(BdrvChild *child, BlockDriverState *new_bs)
bdrv_check_perm(old_bs, NULL, perm, shared_perm, NULL, &error_abort);
bdrv_set_perm(old_bs, perm, shared_perm);
}
-
- if (new_bs) {
- bdrv_get_cumulative_perm(new_bs, &perm, &shared_perm);
- bdrv_set_perm(new_bs, perm, shared_perm);
- }
}
BdrvChild *bdrv_root_attach_child(BlockDriverState *child_bs,
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-08 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-08 18:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] block: Ignore loosening perm restrictions failures Max Reitz
2019-05-08 18:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/7] file-posix: Update open_flags in raw_set_perm() Max Reitz
2019-05-08 18:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/7] block: Add bdrv_child_refresh_perms() Max Reitz
2019-05-08 18:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/7] block/mirror: Fix child permissions Max Reitz
2019-05-08 18:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] block/commit: Drop bdrv_child_try_set_perm() Max Reitz
2019-05-08 18:25 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-05-08 18:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/7] block: Add *tighten_restrictions to *check*_perm() Max Reitz
2019-05-08 18:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/7] block: Ignore loosening perm restrictions failures Max Reitz
2019-05-08 21:50 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190508182546.2239-6-mreitz@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).