* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom`
2019-05-10 8:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom` Kashyap Chamarthy
@ 2019-05-10 8:28 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-05-10 9:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kashyap Chamarthy @ 2019-05-10 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: rjones, berrange, armbru, stefanha, amit
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:15:25AM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
[...]
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
I didn't intentionally retain Dan and Rich's "Reviewed-by" tags. Maybe
I should have, because I only updated the commit message.
> ---
> v2:
> - Update commit message to mention justification for preferring
> `/dev/urandom` over `/dev/random` [stefanha]
> ---
> backends/rng-random.c | 2 +-
> qemu-options.hx | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[...]
--
/kashyap
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom`
2019-05-10 8:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom` Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-05-10 8:28 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
@ 2019-05-10 9:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-10 9:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-05-10 12:03 ` Markus Armbruster
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel P. Berrangé @ 2019-05-10 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kashyap Chamarthy; +Cc: armbru, rjones, qemu-devel, stefanha, amit
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:15:25AM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> When QEMU exposes a VirtIO-RNG device to the guest, that device needs a
> source of entropy, and that source needs to be "non-blocking", like
> `/dev/urandom`. However, currently QEMU defaults to the problematic
> `/dev/random`, which is "blocking" (as in, it waits until sufficient
> entropy is available).
>
> Why prefer `/dev/urandom` over `/dev/random`?
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> The man pages of urandom(4) and random(4) state:
>
> "The /dev/random device is a legacy interface which dates back to a
> time where the cryptographic primitives used in the implementation
> of /dev/urandom were not widely trusted. It will return random
> bytes only within the estimated number of bits of fresh noise in the
> entropy pool, blocking if necessary. /dev/random is suitable for
> applications that need high quality randomness, and can afford
> indeterminate delays."
>
> Further, the "Usage" section of the said man pages state:
>
> "The /dev/random interface is considered a legacy interface, and
> /dev/urandom is preferred and sufficient in all use cases, with the
> exception of applications which require randomness during early boot
> time; for these applications, getrandom(2) must be used instead,
> because it will block until the entropy pool is initialized.
>
> "If a seed file is saved across reboots as recommended below (all
> major Linux distributions have done this since 2000 at least), the
> output is cryptographically secure against attackers without local
> root access as soon as it is reloaded in the boot sequence, and
> perfectly adequate for network encryption session keys. Since reads
> from /dev/random may block, users will usually want to open it in
> nonblocking mode (or perform a read with timeout), and provide some
> sort of user notification if the desired entropy is not immediately
> available."
>
> And refer to random(7) for a comparison of `/dev/random` and
> `/dev/urandom`.
>
> - - -
>
> Given the above, change the entropy source for VirtIO-RNG device to
> `/dev/urandom`.
>
> Related discussion in these[1][2] past threads.
>
> [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg08335.html
> -- "RNG: Any reason QEMU doesn't default to `/dev/urandom`?"
> [2] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg02724.html
> -- "[RFC] Virtio RNG: Consider changing the default entropy source to
> /dev/urandom"
>
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Update commit message to mention justification for preferring
> `/dev/urandom` over `/dev/random` [stefanha]
> ---
> backends/rng-random.c | 2 +-
> qemu-options.hx | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom`
2019-05-10 8:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom` Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-05-10 8:28 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2019-05-10 9:00 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
@ 2019-05-10 9:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-05-10 12:03 ` Markus Armbruster
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2019-05-10 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kashyap Chamarthy; +Cc: armbru, rjones, berrange, qemu-devel, amit
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3018 bytes --]
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:15:25AM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> When QEMU exposes a VirtIO-RNG device to the guest, that device needs a
> source of entropy, and that source needs to be "non-blocking", like
> `/dev/urandom`. However, currently QEMU defaults to the problematic
> `/dev/random`, which is "blocking" (as in, it waits until sufficient
> entropy is available).
>
> Why prefer `/dev/urandom` over `/dev/random`?
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> The man pages of urandom(4) and random(4) state:
>
> "The /dev/random device is a legacy interface which dates back to a
> time where the cryptographic primitives used in the implementation
> of /dev/urandom were not widely trusted. It will return random
> bytes only within the estimated number of bits of fresh noise in the
> entropy pool, blocking if necessary. /dev/random is suitable for
> applications that need high quality randomness, and can afford
> indeterminate delays."
>
> Further, the "Usage" section of the said man pages state:
>
> "The /dev/random interface is considered a legacy interface, and
> /dev/urandom is preferred and sufficient in all use cases, with the
> exception of applications which require randomness during early boot
> time; for these applications, getrandom(2) must be used instead,
> because it will block until the entropy pool is initialized.
>
> "If a seed file is saved across reboots as recommended below (all
> major Linux distributions have done this since 2000 at least), the
> output is cryptographically secure against attackers without local
> root access as soon as it is reloaded in the boot sequence, and
> perfectly adequate for network encryption session keys. Since reads
> from /dev/random may block, users will usually want to open it in
> nonblocking mode (or perform a read with timeout), and provide some
> sort of user notification if the desired entropy is not immediately
> available."
>
> And refer to random(7) for a comparison of `/dev/random` and
> `/dev/urandom`.
>
> - - -
>
> Given the above, change the entropy source for VirtIO-RNG device to
> `/dev/urandom`.
>
> Related discussion in these[1][2] past threads.
>
> [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg08335.html
> -- "RNG: Any reason QEMU doesn't default to `/dev/urandom`?"
> [2] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg02724.html
> -- "[RFC] Virtio RNG: Consider changing the default entropy source to
> /dev/urandom"
>
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Update commit message to mention justification for preferring
> `/dev/urandom` over `/dev/random` [stefanha]
> ---
> backends/rng-random.c | 2 +-
> qemu-options.hx | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom`
2019-05-10 8:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom` Kashyap Chamarthy
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-05-10 9:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2019-05-10 12:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-10 12:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2019-05-10 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kashyap Chamarthy; +Cc: rjones, qemu-devel, stefanha, amit
Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> writes:
> When QEMU exposes a VirtIO-RNG device to the guest, that device needs a
> source of entropy, and that source needs to be "non-blocking", like
> `/dev/urandom`. However, currently QEMU defaults to the problematic
> `/dev/random`, which is "blocking" (as in, it waits until sufficient
> entropy is available).
>
> Why prefer `/dev/urandom` over `/dev/random`?
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> The man pages of urandom(4) and random(4) state:
> "The /dev/random device is a legacy interface which dates back to a
> time where the cryptographic primitives used in the implementation
> of /dev/urandom were not widely trusted. It will return random
> bytes only within the estimated number of bits of fresh noise in the
> entropy pool, blocking if necessary. /dev/random is suitable for
> applications that need high quality randomness, and can afford
> indeterminate delays."
>
> Further, the "Usage" section of the said man pages state:
>
> "The /dev/random interface is considered a legacy interface, and
> /dev/urandom is preferred and sufficient in all use cases, with the
> exception of applications which require randomness during early boot
> time; for these applications, getrandom(2) must be used instead,
> because it will block until the entropy pool is initialized.
>
> "If a seed file is saved across reboots as recommended below (all
> major Linux distributions have done this since 2000 at least), the
> output is cryptographically secure against attackers without local
> root access as soon as it is reloaded in the boot sequence, and
> perfectly adequate for network encryption session keys. Since reads
> from /dev/random may block, users will usually want to open it in
> nonblocking mode (or perform a read with timeout), and provide some
> sort of user notification if the desired entropy is not immediately
> available."
>
> And refer to random(7) for a comparison of `/dev/random` and
> `/dev/urandom`.
This is Linux. What about other supported POSIX[*] hosts? If any such
host has /dev/random that works here, but not /dev/urandom, we regress.
*If* there's an actual regression risk: a simple & stupid way to reduce
it risk could be falling back to /dev/random when opening /dev/urandom
fails. Perhaps only when it fails with ENOENT.
Possible implementation: instead of setting a default filename in
rng_random_init(), change rng_random_opened() to try /dev/urandom, then
/dev/random when filename is still null.
Aside: "opened" sounds like a predicate. Goes back to commit
a9b7b2ad7b0.
> Given the above, change the entropy source for VirtIO-RNG device to
> `/dev/urandom`.
>
> Related discussion in these[1][2] past threads.
>
> [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg08335.html
> -- "RNG: Any reason QEMU doesn't default to `/dev/urandom`?"
> [2] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-09/msg02724.html
> -- "[RFC] Virtio RNG: Consider changing the default entropy source to
> /dev/urandom"
>
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
[*] POSIX because
common-obj-$(CONFIG_POSIX) += rng-random.o
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] VirtIO-RNG: Update default entropy source to `/dev/urandom`
2019-05-10 12:03 ` Markus Armbruster
@ 2019-05-10 12:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel P. Berrangé @ 2019-05-10 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Armbruster; +Cc: qemu-devel, amit, rjones, stefanha, Kashyap Chamarthy
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:03:33PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > When QEMU exposes a VirtIO-RNG device to the guest, that device needs a
> > source of entropy, and that source needs to be "non-blocking", like
> > `/dev/urandom`. However, currently QEMU defaults to the problematic
> > `/dev/random`, which is "blocking" (as in, it waits until sufficient
> > entropy is available).
> >
> > Why prefer `/dev/urandom` over `/dev/random`?
> > ---------------------------------------------
> >
> > The man pages of urandom(4) and random(4) state:
> > "The /dev/random device is a legacy interface which dates back to a
> > time where the cryptographic primitives used in the implementation
> > of /dev/urandom were not widely trusted. It will return random
> > bytes only within the estimated number of bits of fresh noise in the
> > entropy pool, blocking if necessary. /dev/random is suitable for
> > applications that need high quality randomness, and can afford
> > indeterminate delays."
> >
> > Further, the "Usage" section of the said man pages state:
> >
> > "The /dev/random interface is considered a legacy interface, and
> > /dev/urandom is preferred and sufficient in all use cases, with the
> > exception of applications which require randomness during early boot
> > time; for these applications, getrandom(2) must be used instead,
> > because it will block until the entropy pool is initialized.
> >
> > "If a seed file is saved across reboots as recommended below (all
> > major Linux distributions have done this since 2000 at least), the
> > output is cryptographically secure against attackers without local
> > root access as soon as it is reloaded in the boot sequence, and
> > perfectly adequate for network encryption session keys. Since reads
> > from /dev/random may block, users will usually want to open it in
> > nonblocking mode (or perform a read with timeout), and provide some
> > sort of user notification if the desired entropy is not immediately
> > available."
> >
> > And refer to random(7) for a comparison of `/dev/random` and
> > `/dev/urandom`.
>
> This is Linux. What about other supported POSIX[*] hosts? If any such
> host has /dev/random that works here, but not /dev/urandom, we regress.
It exists on OS-X, FreeBSD, DragonFlyBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD, which covers
all the non-Linux platforms we explicitly support, aside from Windows.
On Windows /dev/random doesn't work either so we don't regress. This is
actually another argument in favour of using the newly proposed rng-builtin
by default, as that will work on Windows.
> *If* there's an actual regression risk: a simple & stupid way to reduce
> it risk could be falling back to /dev/random when opening /dev/urandom
> fails. Perhaps only when it fails with ENOENT.
Unless I missed something, I think we'll be ok without the fallback
though I wouldn't object to having a fallback as you describe.
> Possible implementation: instead of setting a default filename in
> rng_random_init(), change rng_random_opened() to try /dev/urandom, then
> /dev/random when filename is still null.
>
> Aside: "opened" sounds like a predicate. Goes back to commit
> a9b7b2ad7b0.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread