qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, "Ján Tomko" <jtomko@redhat.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QMP; unsigned 64-bit ints; JSON standards compliance
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 15:10:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190513141007.GK15029@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ef525uls.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 03:53:19PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:44:07PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> [...]
> >> Double-checking: do you propose to encode *all* numbers as strings, or
> >> just certain "problematic" numbers?
> >> 
> >> If the latter, I guess your idea of "problematic" is "not representable
> >> exactly as double precision floating-point".
> >
> > We have a few options
> >
> >  1. Use string format for values > 2^53-1, int format below that
> >  2. Use string format for all fields which are 64-bit ints whether
> >     signed or unsigned
> >  3. Use string format for all fields which are integers, even 32-bit
> >     ones
> >
> > I would probably suggest option 2. It would make the QEMU impl quite
> > easy IIUC, we we'd just change the QAPI visitor's impl for the int64
> > and uint64 fields to use string format (when the right capability is
> > negotiated by QMP).
> >
> > I include 3 only for completeness - I don't think there's a hugely
> > compelling reason to mess with 32-bit ints.
> 
> Agree.
> 
> > Option 1 is the bare minimum needed to ensure precision, but to me
> > it feels a bit dirty to say a given field will have different encoding
> > depending on the value. If apps need to deal with string encoding, they
> > might as well just use it for all values in a given field.
> 
> I guess that depends on what this interoperability capability does for
> QMP *input*.
> 
> For *output*, QEMU has to encode a number either as JSON number or as
> JSON string
> 
> For *input*, QEMU could accept either.  Or it could accept only the
> encoding it produces on output.
> 
> Got a preference?

IMHO if a mgmt app enables the (hypothetically named) "int64-as-string"
capability, then we should be strict and require string format on both
input & output. If QEMU accepted either, it would silently hide bugs
where the app has mistakenly not used string formatting.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-13 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-30 13:19 [Qemu-devel] QMP; unsigned 64-bit ints; JSON standards compliance Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-30 13:19 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-30 14:45 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-30 14:45   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-30 15:05   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-30 15:05     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-07  8:47     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-07  9:39       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-07 16:32         ` Eric Blake
2019-05-08 12:37           ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-08 12:44             ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-05-08 12:44         ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-13 12:08           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-13 12:29             ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-05-13 12:35               ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-13 14:10                 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-13 13:53             ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-13 14:10               ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2019-05-13 15:15               ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Eric Blake
2019-05-14  6:02                 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-14  9:26                   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-14  9:37                     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-05-14  9:43                       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-14  9:47                         ` Peter Krempa
2019-06-04  6:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2019-06-05 13:06   ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190513141007.GK15029@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=jtomko@redhat.com \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).