From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, "Ján Tomko" <jtomko@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QMP; unsigned 64-bit ints; JSON standards compliance
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 15:10:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190513141007.GK15029@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ef525uls.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 03:53:19PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:44:07PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> [...]
> >> Double-checking: do you propose to encode *all* numbers as strings, or
> >> just certain "problematic" numbers?
> >>
> >> If the latter, I guess your idea of "problematic" is "not representable
> >> exactly as double precision floating-point".
> >
> > We have a few options
> >
> > 1. Use string format for values > 2^53-1, int format below that
> > 2. Use string format for all fields which are 64-bit ints whether
> > signed or unsigned
> > 3. Use string format for all fields which are integers, even 32-bit
> > ones
> >
> > I would probably suggest option 2. It would make the QEMU impl quite
> > easy IIUC, we we'd just change the QAPI visitor's impl for the int64
> > and uint64 fields to use string format (when the right capability is
> > negotiated by QMP).
> >
> > I include 3 only for completeness - I don't think there's a hugely
> > compelling reason to mess with 32-bit ints.
>
> Agree.
>
> > Option 1 is the bare minimum needed to ensure precision, but to me
> > it feels a bit dirty to say a given field will have different encoding
> > depending on the value. If apps need to deal with string encoding, they
> > might as well just use it for all values in a given field.
>
> I guess that depends on what this interoperability capability does for
> QMP *input*.
>
> For *output*, QEMU has to encode a number either as JSON number or as
> JSON string
>
> For *input*, QEMU could accept either. Or it could accept only the
> encoding it produces on output.
>
> Got a preference?
IMHO if a mgmt app enables the (hypothetically named) "int64-as-string"
capability, then we should be strict and require string format on both
input & output. If QEMU accepted either, it would silently hide bugs
where the app has mistakenly not used string formatting.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-13 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 13:19 [Qemu-devel] QMP; unsigned 64-bit ints; JSON standards compliance Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-30 13:19 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-30 14:45 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-30 14:45 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-04-30 15:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-04-30 15:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-07 8:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-07 9:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-07 16:32 ` Eric Blake
2019-05-08 12:37 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-08 12:44 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-05-08 12:44 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-13 12:08 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-13 12:29 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-05-13 12:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-13 14:10 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-13 13:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-13 14:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2019-05-13 15:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Eric Blake
2019-05-14 6:02 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-14 9:26 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-14 9:37 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-05-14 9:43 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-14 9:47 ` Peter Krempa
2019-06-04 6:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2019-06-05 13:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190513141007.GK15029@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=jtomko@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).