qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-stable@nongnu.org,
	peterx@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0.1] q35: Revert to kernel irqchip
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 13:36:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190514133611.3e2e166d@x1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190514192232.GB9512@redhat.com>

On Tue, 14 May 2019 20:22:32 +0100
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 01:03:31PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Commit b2fc91db8447 ("q35: set split kernel irqchip as default") changed
> > the default for the pc-q35-4.0 machine type to use split irqchip, which
> > turned out to have disasterous effects on vfio-pci INTx support.  KVM
> > resampling irqfds are registered for handling these interrupts, but
> > these are non-functional in split irqchip mode.  We can't simply test
> > for split irqchip in QEMU as userspace handling of this interrupt is a
> > significant performance regression versus KVM handling (GeForce GPUs
> > assigned to Windows VMs are non-functional without forcing MSI mode or
> > re-enabling kernel irqchip).
> > 
> > The resolution is to revert the change in default irqchip mode with a
> > new pc-q35-4.0.1 machine type for qemu-stable while the development
> > branch makes the same change in the pc-q35-4.1 machine type.  The
> > qemu-q35-4.0 machine type should not be used in vfio-pci configurations
> > for devices requiring legacy INTx support without explicitly modifying
> > the VM configuration to use KVM irqchip.  This new 4.0.1 machine type
> > makes this change automatically.  
> 
> If we introduce a pc-q35-4.0.1 machine type in -stable, then VMs
> created in stable won't be migratable to future 4.1 unless we also
> create this same machine type in master.

Yes, I overlooked 4.0.1 on 4.1, I'm working on that now.  Reposting a
v2 of the 4.1 version shortly.

> If we really want to create a new 4.0.1 machine type, then this
> patch needs to go to git master before stable IMHO to guarantee
> no regression to master.

Yes, I'm doing both in parallel, I expect the 4.0.1 support to be
contingent on be the master branch change, thus the second link below.
Thanks,

Alex

> > Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1826422
> > Link: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg03305.html
> > Fixes: b2fc91db8447 ("q35: set split kernel irqchip as default")
> > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Do we want new stable versions for other archs too or only as needed?  
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel



  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-14 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-14 19:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0.1] q35: Revert to kernel irqchip Alex Williamson
2019-05-14 19:22 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-14 19:36   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2019-05-14 20:22 ` Alex Williamson
2019-05-16  2:05   ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190514133611.3e2e166d@x1.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).