From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17925C04AB4 for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E37DC2084A for ; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:56:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E37DC2084A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51926 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQbfM-0001Zp-8Y for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 13:56:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQbeY-0000vK-7d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 13:55:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQbeX-00038o-Db for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 13:55:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQbeT-00030h-3w; Tue, 14 May 2019 13:55:45 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724E9309B170; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from linux.fritz.box (ovpn-116-242.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.242]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39C001001943; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 19:55:40 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: Alberto Garcia Message-ID: <20190514175540.GD18881@linux.fritz.box> References: <20190514135735.14497-1-berto@igalia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190514135735.14497-1-berto@igalia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.49]); Tue, 14 May 2019 17:55:44 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Use BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES instead of BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Am 14.05.2019 um 15:57 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben: > There are a few places in which we turn a number of bytes into sectors > in order to compare the result against BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS > instead of using BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES directly. > > Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin