qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-stable@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] block/file-posix: Unaligned O_DIRECT block-status
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 06:15:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190515041541.12367-2-mreitz@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190515041541.12367-1-mreitz@redhat.com>

Currently, qemu crashes whenever someone queries the block status of an
unaligned image tail of an O_DIRECT image:
$ echo > foo
$ qemu-img map --image-opts driver=file,filename=foo,cache.direct=on
Offset          Length          Mapped to       File
qemu-img: block/io.c:2093: bdrv_co_block_status: Assertion `*pnum &&
QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(*pnum, align) && align > offset - aligned_offset'
failed.

This is because bdrv_co_block_status() checks that the result returned
by the driver's implementation is aligned to the request_alignment, but
file-posix can fail to do so, which is actually mentioned in a comment
there: "[...] possibly including a partial sector at EOF".

Fix this by rounding up those partial sectors.

There are two possible alternative fixes:
(1) We could refuse to open unaligned image files with O_DIRECT
    altogether.  That sounds reasonable until you realize that qcow2
    does necessarily not fill up its metadata clusters, and that nobody
    runs qemu-img create with O_DIRECT.  Therefore, unpreallocated qcow2
    files usually have an unaligned image tail.

(2) bdrv_co_block_status() could ignore unaligned tails.  It actually
    throws away everything past the EOF already, so that sounds
    reasonable.
    Unfortunately, the block layer knows file lengths only with a
    granularity of BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, so bdrv_co_block_status() usually
    would have to guess whether its file length information is inexact
    or whether the driver is broken.

Fixing what raw_co_block_status() returns is the safest thing to do.

There seems to be no other block driver that sets request_alignment and
does not make sure that it always returns aligned values.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
---
 block/file-posix.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
index e09e15bbf8..d018429672 100644
--- a/block/file-posix.c
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -2488,6 +2488,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
     off_t data = 0, hole = 0;
     int ret;
 
+    assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset | bytes, bs->bl.request_alignment));
+
     ret = fd_open(bs);
     if (ret < 0) {
         return ret;
@@ -2513,6 +2515,20 @@ static int coroutine_fn raw_co_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
         /* On a data extent, compute bytes to the end of the extent,
          * possibly including a partial sector at EOF. */
         *pnum = MIN(bytes, hole - offset);
+
+        /*
+         * We are not allowed to return partial sectors, though, so
+         * round up if necessary.
+         */
+        if (!QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(*pnum, bs->bl.request_alignment)) {
+            int64_t file_length = raw_getlength(bs);
+            if (file_length > 0) {
+                /* Ignore errors, this is just a safeguard */
+                assert(hole == file_length);
+            }
+            *pnum = ROUND_UP(*pnum, bs->bl.request_alignment);
+        }
+
         ret = BDRV_BLOCK_DATA;
     } else {
         /* On a hole, compute bytes to the beginning of the next extent.  */
-- 
2.21.0



  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-15  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-15  4:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] block/file-posix: Fix unaligned O_DIRECT block status Max Reitz
2019-05-15  4:15 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-05-15  4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: Test unaligned raw images with O_DIRECT Max Reitz
2019-05-20 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] block/file-posix: Fix unaligned O_DIRECT block status Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190515041541.12367-2-mreitz@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).