qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] block/file-posix: Fix unaligned O_DIRECT block status
@ 2019-05-15  4:15 Max Reitz
  2019-05-15  4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] block/file-posix: Unaligned O_DIRECT block-status Max Reitz
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Max Reitz @ 2019-05-15  4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-block; +Cc: Kevin Wolf, qemu-stable, qemu-devel, Max Reitz

The user-visible problem:
$ echo > foo
$ qemu-img map --image-opts driver=file,filename=foo,cache.direct=on
Offset          Length          Mapped to       File
qemu-img: block/io.c:2093: bdrv_co_block_status: Assertion `*pnum &&
QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(*pnum, align) && align > offset - aligned_offset'
failed.

The internal problem: file-posix truncates status requests to the EOF.
If the EOF is not aligned at the request_alignment,
bdrv_co_block_status() won't like that.

See patch 1 for a deeper discussion (including two possible alternatives
how we could address the problem).
(As I note there, I’ve looked through all block drivers, and I didn’t
find any other which could have the same problem.  gluster uses the same
block-status code, but it doesn’t set a request_alignment.  NBD
force-aligns the server response in nbd_parse_blockstatus_payload().
qcow2... Should be fine as long as no crypto driver has a block limit
exceeding the qcow2 cluster size.  And so on.)

Patch 2 adds a test.  After writing that test, I noticed that we already
had one: 109 fails with -c none before patch 1.  Er, well, at least the
new test is more succinct and has the correct default cache mode, so it
will actually do the test if you run ./check without enforcing any cache
on a filesystem that supports O_DIRECT.


v2:
- Shortened the assert() in patch 1 [Eric]


git backport-diff against v1:

Key:
[----] : patches are identical
[####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch
[down] : patch is downstream-only
The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively

001/2:[0003] [FC] 'block/file-posix: Unaligned O_DIRECT block-status'
002/2:[----] [--] 'iotests: Test unaligned raw images with O_DIRECT'


Max Reitz (2):
  block/file-posix: Unaligned O_DIRECT block-status
  iotests: Test unaligned raw images with O_DIRECT

 block/file-posix.c         | 16 ++++++++
 tests/qemu-iotests/221     |  4 ++
 tests/qemu-iotests/253     | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/qemu-iotests/253.out | 14 +++++++
 tests/qemu-iotests/group   |  1 +
 5 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/253
 create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/253.out

-- 
2.21.0



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-20 13:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-15  4:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] block/file-posix: Fix unaligned O_DIRECT block status Max Reitz
2019-05-15  4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] block/file-posix: Unaligned O_DIRECT block-status Max Reitz
2019-05-15  4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: Test unaligned raw images with O_DIRECT Max Reitz
2019-05-20 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] block/file-posix: Fix unaligned O_DIRECT block status Kevin Wolf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).