From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0.1] q35: Revert to kernel irqchip
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 10:05:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190516020501.GJ16681@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190514142203.430c106e@x1.home>
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 02:22:03PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2019 13:03:31 -0600
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Commit b2fc91db8447 ("q35: set split kernel irqchip as default") changed
> > the default for the pc-q35-4.0 machine type to use split irqchip, which
> > turned out to have disasterous effects on vfio-pci INTx support. KVM
> > resampling irqfds are registered for handling these interrupts, but
> > these are non-functional in split irqchip mode. We can't simply test
> > for split irqchip in QEMU as userspace handling of this interrupt is a
> > significant performance regression versus KVM handling (GeForce GPUs
> > assigned to Windows VMs are non-functional without forcing MSI mode or
> > re-enabling kernel irqchip).
> >
> > The resolution is to revert the change in default irqchip mode with a
> > new pc-q35-4.0.1 machine type for qemu-stable while the development
> > branch makes the same change in the pc-q35-4.1 machine type. The
> > qemu-q35-4.0 machine type should not be used in vfio-pci configurations
> > for devices requiring legacy INTx support without explicitly modifying
> > the VM configuration to use KVM irqchip. This new 4.0.1 machine type
> > makes this change automatically.
> >
> > Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1826422
> > Link: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg03305.html
>
> This link is superseded by a v2 of the mainline patch:
>
> Link: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg03338.html
>
> I believe this patch is still the proper stable backport though. Also
> to clarify, this patch should be gated on mainline acceptance of the
> link above, but clearly there's no clean cherry-pick between mainline
> and stable for this, so I'm proposing them in parallel. Thanks,
Agreed. As long as the 4.1 patch can be accepted, this should be the
correct patch for 4.0-stable AFAICT:
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-16 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-14 19:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0.1] q35: Revert to kernel irqchip Alex Williamson
2019-05-14 19:22 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-05-14 19:36 ` Alex Williamson
2019-05-14 20:22 ` Alex Williamson
2019-05-16 2:05 ` Peter Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190516020501.GJ16681@xz-x1 \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).