From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Peter Crosthwaite" <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Brice Goglin" <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] i386/cpu: Consolidate die-id validity in smp context
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 18:12:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521171229.GD2824@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190520165056.175475-3-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
* Like Xu (like.xu@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> Following the legacy smp check rules, the die_id validity is added to
> the same contexts as leagcy smp variables such as hmp_hotpluggable_cpus(),
> machine_set_cpu_numa_node(), cpu_slot_to_string() and pc_cpu_pre_plug().
>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> hmp.c | 3 +++
> hw/core/machine.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> hw/i386/pc.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hmp.c b/hmp.c
> index 56a3ed7375..7deb7b7226 100644
> --- a/hmp.c
> +++ b/hmp.c
> @@ -3112,6 +3112,9 @@ void hmp_hotpluggable_cpus(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
> if (c->has_socket_id) {
> monitor_printf(mon, " socket-id: \"%" PRIu64 "\"\n", c->socket_id);
> }
> + if (c->has_die_id) {
> + monitor_printf(mon, " die-id: \"%" PRIu64 "\"\n", c->die_id);
> + }
> if (c->has_core_id) {
> monitor_printf(mon, " core-id: \"%" PRIu64 "\"\n", c->core_id);
> }
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index 5d046a43e3..5116429732 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -659,6 +659,11 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine,
> return;
> }
>
> + if (props->has_die_id && !slot->props.has_die_id) {
> + error_setg(errp, "die-id is not supported");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> /* skip slots with explicit mismatch */
> if (props->has_thread_id && props->thread_id != slot->props.thread_id) {
> continue;
> @@ -668,6 +673,10 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine,
> continue;
> }
>
> + if (props->has_die_id && props->die_id != slot->props.die_id) {
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> if (props->has_socket_id && props->socket_id != slot->props.socket_id) {
> continue;
> }
> @@ -925,6 +934,9 @@ static char *cpu_slot_to_string(const CPUArchId *cpu)
> if (cpu->props.has_socket_id) {
> g_string_append_printf(s, "socket-id: %"PRId64, cpu->props.socket_id);
> }
> + if (cpu->props.has_die_id) {
> + g_string_append_printf(s, "die-id: %"PRId64, cpu->props.die_id);
> + }
> if (cpu->props.has_core_id) {
> if (s->len) {
> g_string_append_printf(s, ", ");
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index 83ab53c814..00be2463af 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -2321,6 +2321,10 @@ static void pc_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU socket-id: %u must be in range 0:%u",
> cpu->socket_id, max_socket);
> return;
> + } else if (cpu->die_id > max_socket) {
> + error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU die-id: %u must be in range 0:%u",
> + cpu->die_id, max_socket);
> + return;
Can you explain why the die_id is related to max_socket?
I'd assumed you could have a 2 socket system where each socket has 4
dies.
However, for the HMP side of it:
Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> }
> if (cpu->core_id < 0) {
> error_setg(errp, "CPU core-id is not set");
> @@ -2378,6 +2382,13 @@ static void pc_cpu_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> }
> cpu->socket_id = topo.pkg_id;
>
> + if (cpu->die_id != -1 && cpu->die_id != topo.die_id) {
> + error_setg(errp, "property die-id: %u doesn't match set apic-id:"
> + " 0x%x (die-id: %u)", cpu->die_id, cpu->apic_id, topo.die_id);
> + return;
> + }
> + cpu->die_id = topo.die_id;
> +
> if (cpu->core_id != -1 && cpu->core_id != topo.core_id) {
> error_setg(errp, "property core-id: %u doesn't match set apic-id:"
> " 0x%x (core-id: %u)", cpu->core_id, cpu->apic_id, topo.core_id);
> --
> 2.21.0
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-20 16:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce cpu die topology and enable CPUID.1F for i386 Like Xu
2019-05-20 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] target/i386: Add cpu die-level topology support for X86CPU Like Xu
2019-06-06 3:24 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-06 3:32 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-10 13:42 ` Like Xu
2019-05-20 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] i386/cpu: Consolidate die-id validity in smp context Like Xu
2019-05-21 17:12 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2019-05-28 2:27 ` Like Xu
2019-05-20 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] vl.c: Add -smp, dies=* command line support and update -smp doc Like Xu
2019-06-06 3:15 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-05-20 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] i386/cpu: Update apicid parsing rules and topo-bit tests for dies Like Xu
2019-05-20 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] target/i386: Add CPUID.1F generation support for multi-die PCMachine Like Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190521171229.GD2824@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).