From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: fam@euphon.net, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, den@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] block: avoid recursive block_status call if possible
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 12:32:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190522103250.GC6087@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408162617.258535-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Am 08.04.2019 um 18:26 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> drv_co_block_status digs bs->file for additional, more accurate search
> for hole inside region, reported as DATA by bs since 5daa74a6ebc.
>
> This accuracy is not free: assume we have qcow2 disk. Actually, qcow2
> knows, where are holes and where is data. But every block_status
> request calls lseek additionally. Assume a big disk, full of
> data, in any iterative copying block job (or img convert) we'll call
> lseek(HOLE) on every iteration, and each of these lseeks will have to
> iterate through all metadata up to the end of file. It's obviously
> ineffective behavior. And for many scenarios we don't need this lseek
> at all.
>
> However, lseek is needed when we have metadata-preallocated image.
>
> So, let's detect metadata-preallocation case and don't dig qcow2's
> protocol file in other cases.
>
> The idea is to compare allocation size in POV of filesystem with
> allocations size in POV of Qcow2 (by refcounts). If allocation in fs is
> significantly lower, consider it as metadata-preallocation case.
>
> 102 iotest changed, as our detector can't detect shrinked file as
> metadata-preallocation, which don't seem to be wrong, as with metadata
> preallocation we always have valid file length.
>
> Other two iotests tiny changed QMP output sequence, which should be
> exactly because skipped lseek at mirror beginning.
No, these hunks don't show an improvement. An earlier {'return':{}}
means that the block job coroutine has yielded earlier, so it's doing a
blocking operation where it didn't do one before the patch.
What happens is that qcow2_detect_metadata_preallocation() causes
additional I/O by reading in the refcount block.
I'll modify the commit message accordingly while applying.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-22 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 16:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 16:26 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] tests/perf: Test lseek influence on qcow2 block-status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 16:26 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 16:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] block: avoid recursive block_status call if possible Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 16:26 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-05-22 10:32 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2019-05-27 15:13 ` Max Reitz
2019-05-28 6:39 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-05-28 15:47 ` Max Reitz
2019-04-22 9:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for 4.1 0/2] avoid lseek on block_status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-22 9:58 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-05-06 15:14 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-05-21 7:50 ` [Qemu-devel] ping " Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-05-22 10:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2019-05-22 11:30 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190522103250.GC6087@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).