From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B7AC282DD for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 11:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F6320881 for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 11:58:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B7F6320881 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34408 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTmN1-0005Ij-Qi for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:58:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTmKy-00045u-1u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:56:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTmKw-0001sN-84 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:56:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hTmKw-0001hg-3c; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:56:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74224C0578C4; Thu, 23 May 2019 11:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (dhcp-192-213.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.213]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06945D9D2; Thu, 23 May 2019 11:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 13:56:02 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Aleksandar Markovic Message-ID: <20190523135602.4c80c959.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20190521152810.21353-1-cohuck@redhat.com> <20190521152810.21353-3-cohuck@redhat.com> <6e216877-60be-ddcd-3f15-604e870ca8ba@redhat.com> <20190522140729.25970e17.cohuck@redhat.com> <6b101b85-4985-4736-acad-59389b00de55@vivier.eu> <20190522142421.746f7495.cohuck@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Thu, 23 May 2019 11:56:24 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v3 47/55] linux headers: update against Linux 5.2-rc1 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Alex =?UTF-8?B?QmVubsOpZQ==?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Aleksandar Markovic , Philippe =?UTF-8?B?TWF0aGlldS1EYXVk?= =?UTF-8?B?w6k=?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, 22 May 2019 15:22:23 +0200 Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > The alternative way of invoking via IPCV6 (else part of =E2=80=9Cifdef > __NR_MSGSND=E2=80=9D) should work for MIPS in the present stage of header= s and > kernel. I tried to do that so that we have at least a workaround for now; but this fails building on my x86 laptop (the safe_syscall6 for ipc complains about missing __NR_ipc). Maybe I'm holding it wrong (should that be conditional on the host?), but I think that really needs to be done by the mips maintainers...