From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B59C072B5 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 06:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DABFC20868 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 06:39:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DABFC20868 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49713 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hU3rC-0004Gg-3E for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 24 May 2019 02:39:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40719) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hU3pH-00038H-Px for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2019 02:37:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hU3pG-00035R-SH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2019 02:37:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hU3pG-00034o-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2019 02:37:10 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 015FDC05D266; Fri, 24 May 2019 06:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1w.redhat.com (ovpn-204-235.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.235]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6A335B689; Fri, 24 May 2019 06:36:59 +0000 (UTC) From: =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 08:35:41 +0200 Message-Id: <20190524063553.5339-9-philmd@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190524063553.5339-1-philmd@redhat.com> References: <20190524063553.5339-1-philmd@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Fri, 24 May 2019 06:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/20] hw/i386/pc: Use address_space_memory in place X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Yang Zhong , Eduardo Habkost , Rob Bradford , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Marcelo Tosatti , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Samuel Ortiz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" The address_space_memory variable is used once. Use it in place and remove the argument. Suggested-by: Samuel Ortiz Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 --- hw/i386/pc.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c index fc22779ac1..a3936bb29d 100644 --- a/hw/i386/pc.c +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ static void pc_build_smbios(PCMachineState *pcms) } } =20 -static FWCfgState *bochs_bios_init(AddressSpace *as, PCMachineState *pcm= s) +static FWCfgState *bochs_bios_init(PCMachineState *pcms) { FWCfgState *fw_cfg; uint64_t *numa_fw_cfg; @@ -936,7 +936,8 @@ static FWCfgState *bochs_bios_init(AddressSpace *as, = PCMachineState *pcms) const CPUArchIdList *cpus; MachineClass *mc =3D MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms); =20 - fw_cfg =3D fw_cfg_init_io_dma(FW_CFG_IO_BASE, FW_CFG_IO_BASE + 4, as= ); + fw_cfg =3D fw_cfg_init_io_dma(FW_CFG_IO_BASE, FW_CFG_IO_BASE + 4, + &address_space_memory); fw_cfg_add_i16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_NB_CPUS, pcms->boot_cpus); =20 /* FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS is a bit confusing/problematic on x86: @@ -1761,7 +1762,7 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms, option_rom_mr, 1); =20 - fw_cfg =3D bochs_bios_init(&address_space_memory, pcms); + fw_cfg =3D bochs_bios_init(pcms); =20 rom_set_fw(fw_cfg); =20 --=20 2.20.1