From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
quintela@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migratioin/ram: leave RAMBlock->bmap blank on allocating
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 11:34:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190601033441.GB4958@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190531164337.GK3169@work-vm>
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:43:37PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Wei Yang (richardw.yang@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> > During migration, we would sync bitmap from ram_list.dirty_memory to
> > RAMBlock.bmap in cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap().
> >
> > Since we set RAMBlock.bmap and ram_list.dirty_memory both to all 1, this
> > means at the first round this sync is meaningless and is a duplicated
> > work.
> >
> > Leaving RAMBlock->bmap blank on allocating would have a side effect on
> > migration_dirty_pages, since it is calculated from the result of
> > cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(). To keep it right, we need to
> > set migration_dirty_pages to 0 in ram_state_init().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
>
> I've looked at this for a while, and I think it's OK, so
>
> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
>
> Peter, Juan: Can you just see if there's arny reason this would be bad,
> but I think it's actually more sensible than what we have.
I really suspect it will work in all cases... Wei, have you done any
test (or better, thorough tests) with this change? My reasoning of
why we should need the bitmap all set is here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg07361.html
Regards,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-01 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-07 3:17 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migratioin/ram: leave RAMBlock->bmap blank on allocating Wei Yang
2019-05-31 16:43 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-06-01 3:34 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2019-06-03 1:33 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-03 2:35 ` Peter Xu
2019-06-03 3:36 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-03 5:40 ` Peter Xu
2019-06-03 6:05 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-03 6:10 ` Wei Yang
2019-06-03 6:35 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190601033441.GB4958@xz-x1 \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).