From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
dgilbert@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] migratioin/ram: leave RAMBlock->bmap blank on allocating
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:17:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604061727.6857-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
During migration, we would sync bitmap from ram_list.dirty_memory to
RAMBlock.bmap in cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap().
Since we set RAMBlock.bmap and ram_list.dirty_memory both to all 1, this
means at the first round this sync is meaningless and is a duplicated
work.
Leaving RAMBlock->bmap blank on allocating would have a side effect on
migration_dirty_pages, since it is calculated from the result of
cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(). To keep it right, we need to
set migration_dirty_pages to 0 in ram_state_init().
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
---
v3: adjust comment based on Peter's comments
v2: add a comment explaining why leaving RAMBlock.bmap clear
---
migration/ram.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
index 4c60869226..c3ece382ae 100644
--- a/migration/ram.c
+++ b/migration/ram.c
@@ -3182,11 +3182,11 @@ static int ram_state_init(RAMState **rsp)
QSIMPLEQ_INIT(&(*rsp)->src_page_requests);
/*
- * Count the total number of pages used by ram blocks not including any
- * gaps due to alignment or unplugs.
+ * This must match with the initial values of dirty bitmap.
+ * Currently we initialize the dirty bitmap to all zeros so
+ * here the total dirty page count is zero.
*/
- (*rsp)->migration_dirty_pages = ram_bytes_total() >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
-
+ (*rsp)->migration_dirty_pages = 0;
ram_state_reset(*rsp);
return 0;
@@ -3201,8 +3201,16 @@ static void ram_list_init_bitmaps(void)
if (ram_bytes_total()) {
RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_NOT_IGNORED(block) {
pages = block->max_length >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
+ /*
+ * The initial dirty bitmap for migration must be set with all
+ * ones to make sure we'll migrate every guest RAM page to
+ * destination.
+ * Here we didn't set RAMBlock.bmap simply because it is already
+ * set in ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION] in
+ * ram_block_add, and that's where we'll sync the dirty bitmaps.
+ * Here setting RAMBlock.bmap would be fine too but not necessary.
+ */
block->bmap = bitmap_new(pages);
- bitmap_set(block->bmap, 0, pages);
if (migrate_postcopy_ram()) {
block->unsentmap = bitmap_new(pages);
bitmap_set(block->unsentmap, 0, pages);
--
2.19.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-06-04 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-04 6:17 Wei Yang [this message]
2019-06-04 7:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] migratioin/ram: leave RAMBlock->bmap blank on allocating Peter Xu
2019-06-04 8:32 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190604061727.6857-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).