qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Deprecation policy and build dependencies
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:50:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190605155006.GI8956@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871s0asvli.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 02:26:49PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On 5/31/19 3:24 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >> Long story short: I would really like to drop support for Python
> >> 2 in QEMU 4.1.
> 
> The sooner, the better, as far as I'm concerned.
> 
> >> What exactly prevents us from doing this?  Does our deprecation
> >> policy really apply to build dependencies?
> >> 
> >
> > Normally I'd say it's only nice to also follow the depreciation policy
> > for tooling as well to give people a chance to switch away, but with
> > regards to Python2, I feel like we're in the clear to drop it for the
> > first release that will happen after the Python2 doomsday clock.
> >
> > (So, probably 4.2.)
> 
> In addition to our feature deprecation policity, we have a "Supported
> build platforms" policy (commit 45b47130f4b).  The most common holdback
> is this one:
> 
>     For distributions with long-lifetime releases, the project will aim
>     to support the most recent major version at all times. Support for
>     the previous major version will be dropped 2 years after the new
>     major version is released. For the purposes of identifying supported
>     software versions, the project will look at RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu
>     LTS, and SLES distros. Other long-lifetime distros will be assumed
>     to ship similar software versions.
> 
> RHEL-7 has Python 3 only in EPEL.  RHEL-8 came out last month.  Unless
> we interpret our policy to include EPEL, this means supporting Python 2
> for some 16 months after upstream Python retires it.  My personal
> opinion: nuts.

We've not said whether this refers to only base repos, or whether addon
repos are accepted. IMHO, we are reasonably justified in saying RHEL-7
as a build platform covers any repo provided by Red Hat, which would
give us Python3 via software collections. I think it would be reasonable
to also state it covers EPEL, since EPEL is such a commonly used repo
with RHEL.

IOW, I don't think RHEL-7 support as a build platform blocks us from
dropping py2. We merely need to tweak our build platforms doc to clarify
our intent wrt add-on yum repos.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-05 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-31 19:24 [Qemu-devel] Deprecation policy and build dependencies Eduardo Habkost
2019-05-31 22:06 ` John Snow
2019-06-03 12:26   ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-03 18:02     ` John Snow
2019-06-03 18:16       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 19:44         ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-04  7:14         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-06-03 18:17       ` Peter Maydell
2019-06-03 18:21         ` John Snow
2019-06-03 18:27           ` Peter Maydell
2019-06-03 18:38             ` John Snow
2019-06-04  5:31             ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-04 15:51               ` John Snow
2019-06-04  5:26       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2019-06-05 15:50     ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2019-06-05 20:13       ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-05 20:42         ` Eric Blake
2019-06-05 20:49           ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-05 22:02             ` Eric Blake
2019-06-06  5:22           ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-06  9:19           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-06-05 15:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-06-05 18:13   ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-06  9:23     ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190605155006.GI8956@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).