From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Deprecation policy and build dependencies
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 17:49:20 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190605204920.GG22416@habkost.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6a830b7-2892-6f05-faa1-3c8124e7e78a@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:42:39PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 6/5/19 3:13 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> >> IOW, I don't think RHEL-7 support as a build platform blocks us from
> >> dropping py2. We merely need to tweak our build platforms doc to clarify
> >> our intent wrt add-on yum repos.
> >
> > If we clarify the docs in QEMU 4.1, is there anything that
> > prevents us from removing Python 2 support in QEMU 4.1 too?
>
> My take (but not definitive): if we have any CI setups that are testing
> RHEL 7 without software collections and/or EPEL, then save Python 2
> removal for 4.2 to give us time to update CI setups. But if all of our
> CI setups are already fine, and we clarify the docs, then I'm all for
> getting rid of Python 2 support in 4.1.
If we do this soon, CI system owners will have at least 9 weeks
to fix them before 4.1.0 is released.
>
> Similarly, if we are going to outlaw in-tree builds, let's get that done
> in 4.1 instead of waiting yet another release.
I'm missing the context on this. Is this from a separate discussion?
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-05 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-31 19:24 [Qemu-devel] Deprecation policy and build dependencies Eduardo Habkost
2019-05-31 22:06 ` John Snow
2019-06-03 12:26 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-03 18:02 ` John Snow
2019-06-03 18:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-06-03 19:44 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-04 7:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-06-03 18:17 ` Peter Maydell
2019-06-03 18:21 ` John Snow
2019-06-03 18:27 ` Peter Maydell
2019-06-03 18:38 ` John Snow
2019-06-04 5:31 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-04 15:51 ` John Snow
2019-06-04 5:26 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2019-06-05 15:50 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-06-05 20:13 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-05 20:42 ` Eric Blake
2019-06-05 20:49 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2019-06-05 22:02 ` Eric Blake
2019-06-06 5:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-06 9:19 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-06-05 15:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-06-05 18:13 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-06 9:23 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190605204920.GG22416@habkost.net \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).