From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] numa: deprecate '-numa node, mem' and default memory distribution
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:16:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190606091606.GC14300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190605180608.GW22416@habkost.net>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:06:08PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 06:33:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> [...]
> > I wonder if there's a way to close the testing gap somehow ? Random idea
> > would be a non-versioned "pc-no-deprecated" machine type, which blocks
> > all use of deprecated features and does not promise any migration compat.
> > Essentially it would exist just for testing purposem as a way todo
> > functional tests for libvirt & mgmt apps to prove they don't use any
> > deprecated features (any deprecated features, not merely this NUMA one).
>
> This isn't the first time I wish we had a machine type with
> experimental features enabled. What about calling it "pc-next"?
No objection from me.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-06 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-30 8:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] numa: deprecate '-numa node, mem' and default memory distribution Igor Mammedov
2019-05-30 8:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] machine: show if CLI option '-numa node, mem' is supported in QAPI schema Igor Mammedov
2019-06-07 17:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-07 18:02 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-11 8:29 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-10 12:31 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-06-10 13:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 " Igor Mammedov
2019-06-11 8:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-05-30 8:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] numa: deprecate 'mem' parameter of '-numa node' option Igor Mammedov
2019-05-30 8:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/3] numa: deprecate implict memory distribution between nodes Igor Mammedov
2019-06-05 17:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] numa: deprecate '-numa node, mem' and default memory distribution Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-06-05 18:06 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-06-06 9:16 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2019-06-07 17:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-06-10 12:19 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-06-17 13:11 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190606091606.GC14300@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).