From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE322C31E44 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 851CA21773 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:58:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 851CA21773 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:49738 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbiyY-00065C-Ku for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:58:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbijg-0001q8-Vf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:43:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbije-0007MH-UM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:43:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbijb-0007DS-3L; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 05:42:59 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896643082B25; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com (dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com [10.33.200.226]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C00AC2CE56; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:42:52 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: Stefan Weil Message-ID: <20190614094252.GD6042@dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com> References: <20190605213654.9785-1-ptoscano@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.45]); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6] ssh: switch from libssh2 to libssh X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" , qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , rjones@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, Pino Toscano , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Am 13.06.2019 um 21:41 hat Stefan Weil geschrieben: > On 12.06.19 15:27, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=E9 wrote: > > Cc'ing Alex (Docker, Travis) and Stefan (MinGW) > [...] > > Note, libssh is not available on MinGW. >=20 > Nor is it available for Mingw64: >=20 > https://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=3Dmingw64-x86_64-libs= sh&arch=3Dx86_64 >=20 > That makes building for Windows more difficult because there is an > additional dependency which must be built from source. How many people do actually use the ssh block driver on Windows, though? Isn't just building QEMU without it a quite reasonable option, too? I wouldn't consider this a strong argument why we should keep using an obsolete library. Kevin