From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005F0C31E5B for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCF7E20B1F for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:05:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CCF7E20B1F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:32956 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdJPu-0003DI-DM for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:05:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdJO3-0002Wv-PZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:03:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdJNy-0005c7-6v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:03:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdJNx-0005ZG-3o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 15:03:14 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11047C18B2DE; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:03:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-116-30.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.30]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173EB98B5; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:03:03 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: Juan Quintela Message-ID: <20190618190303.GF4296@localhost.localdomain> References: <87d0jb9cex.fsf@trasno.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d0jb9cex.fsf@trasno.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:03:07 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for 2019-06-18 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Am 18.06.2019 um 16:49 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben: > * Kevin is experimenthing with an external qemu-storage daemon > * qemu-storage daemon vs process for each image > * compromise: less isolation but easier to do > * i.e. just doing the full subsystem instead of each device This is something that users can do then, but it's not a must. The storage daemon is just a building block, and it's completely up to the user whether they start a single daemon with many --blockdev options and exports, or whether they start many daemons that serve only a single image each. Kevin