From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] memory: do not do out of bound notification
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 06:57:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620105752.GD9303@joy-OptiPlex-7040> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6829b139-3eab-449e-04d6-07f1e381316d@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 04:35:29PM +0800, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 20/06/19 06:02, Peter Xu wrote:
> > Seems workable, to be explicit - we can even cut it into chunks with
> > different size to be efficient.
>
> Yes, this is not hard (completely untested):
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index 44b1231157..541538bc6c 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -3388,39 +3388,34 @@ static void vtd_address_space_unmap(VTDAddressSpace *as, IOMMUNotifier *n)
> }
>
> assert(start <= end);
> - size = end - start;
> + while (end > start) {
> + size = end - start;
> + /* Only keep the lowest bit of either size or start. */
> + size = MIN(size & -size, start & -start);
> + /* Should not happen, but limit to address width too just in case */
> + size = MIN(size, 1ULL << s->aw_bits);
>
> - if (ctpop64(size) != 1) {
> - /*
> - * This size cannot format a correct mask. Let's enlarge it to
> - * suite the minimum available mask.
> - */
> - int n = 64 - clz64(size);
> - if (n > s->aw_bits) {
> - /* should not happen, but in case it happens, limit it */
> - n = s->aw_bits;
> - }
> - size = 1ULL << n;
> - }
> + assert((start & (size - 1)) == 0);
>
> - entry.target_as = &address_space_memory;
> - /* Adjust iova for the size */
> - entry.iova = n->start & ~(size - 1);
> - /* This field is meaningless for unmap */
> - entry.translated_addr = 0;
> - entry.perm = IOMMU_NONE;
> - entry.addr_mask = size - 1;
> + entry.target_as = &address_space_memory;
> + entry.iova = start;
> + /* This field is meaningless for unmap */
> + entry.translated_addr = 0;
> + entry.perm = IOMMU_NONE;
> + entry.addr_mask = size - 1;
>
> - trace_vtd_as_unmap_whole(pci_bus_num(as->bus),
> - VTD_PCI_SLOT(as->devfn),
> - VTD_PCI_FUNC(as->devfn),
> - entry.iova, size);
> + trace_vtd_as_unmap_whole(pci_bus_num(as->bus),
> + VTD_PCI_SLOT(as->devfn),
> + VTD_PCI_FUNC(as->devfn),
> + entry.iova, size);
>
> - map.iova = entry.iova;
> - map.size = entry.addr_mask;
> - iova_tree_remove(as->iova_tree, &map);
> + map.iova = entry.iova;
> + map.size = entry.addr_mask;
> + iova_tree_remove(as->iova_tree, &map);
>
> - memory_region_notify_one(n, &entry);
> + memory_region_notify_one(n, &entry);
> + start += size;
> + }
> }
>
> static void vtd_address_space_unmap_all(IntelIOMMUState *s)
>
>
> Yan,
>
> if something like this works for you, let me know and I will submit it
> as a proper patch.
>
> Paolo
hi Paolo
Thanks and I'll try it tomorrow and let you know the result.
But may I know why it cannot simply be like below?
Thanks
Yan
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index b0d8a1c..2956db6 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -3374,7 +3374,6 @@ static void vtd_address_space_unmap(VTDAddressSpace *as, IOMMUNotifier *n)
IntelIOMMUState *s = as->iommu_state;
DMAMap map;
/*
* Note: all the codes in this function has a assumption that IOVA
* bits are no more than VTD_MGAW bits (which is restricted by
@@ -3392,23 +3391,8 @@ static void vtd_address_space_unmap(VTDAddressSpace *as, IOMMUNotifier *n)
assert(start <= end);
size = end - start;
- if (ctpop64(size) != 1) {
- /*
- * This size cannot format a correct mask. Let's enlarge it to
- * suite the minimum available mask.
- */
- int n = 64 - clz64(size);
- if (n > s->aw_bits) {
- /* should not happen, but in case it happens, limit it */
- n = s->aw_bits;
- }
- size = 1ULL << n;
- }
-
-
entry.target_as = &address_space_memory;
- /* Adjust iova for the size */
- entry.iova = n->start & ~(size - 1);
+ entry.iova = n->start;
/* This field is meaningless for unmap */
entry.translated_addr = 0;
entry.perm = IOMMU_NONE;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-20 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-19 8:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] memory: do not do out of bound notification Yan Zhao
2019-06-19 13:17 ` Auger Eric
2019-06-20 1:46 ` Yan Zhao
2019-06-20 4:02 ` Peter Xu
2019-06-20 4:14 ` Yan Zhao
2019-06-20 8:14 ` Peter Xu
2019-06-20 8:13 ` Yan Zhao
2019-06-20 8:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-06-20 10:57 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2019-06-20 12:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-06-20 12:59 ` Peter Xu
2019-06-20 13:04 ` Peter Xu
2019-06-24 5:22 ` Yan Zhao
2019-06-24 6:14 ` Peter Xu
2019-06-20 13:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-06-21 2:36 ` Peter Xu
2019-06-21 7:57 ` Yan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190620105752.GD9303@joy-OptiPlex-7040 \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).